Loopholes in developing English communicative competence: A comparative case study of Pakistan and China

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Comparative and International Education Pub Date : 2022-09-24 DOI:10.1177/17454999221128474
Muhammad Saleem, Abdul Razaque Larik, Syed Majid Ali Shah Bukhari
{"title":"Loopholes in developing English communicative competence: A comparative case study of Pakistan and China","authors":"Muhammad Saleem, Abdul Razaque Larik, Syed Majid Ali Shah Bukhari","doi":"10.1177/17454999221128474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the challenges faced by Pakistani and Chinese English language instructors in developing communicative competence among senior high school students, and highlights the fundamental loopholes. Employing a thematic analysis within a qualitative comparative case study, the findings reveal learners’ substandard prior knowledge as the biggest loophole in both Pakistan and China, which causes instructors to overuse local languages. There exists misalignment in curriculum, instruction, and assessment; consequently, the instructional practices are drastically examination-oriented producing rote-learners, and significantly hamper the development of communicative competence. Pakistani syllabi appear to be outdated. There is unavailability of modern linguistic resources in Pakistan while the Chinese instructors evade using them despite their availability. Chinese teacher-student interaction and Pakistani parental involvement are bleak. Findings suggest that respective governments should pay attention to their junior high school systems for developing students’ prerequisite knowledge and implement leaner-centered instruction. Pakistani senior high school syllabi should be modified.","PeriodicalId":45946,"journal":{"name":"Research in Comparative and International Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"373 - 394"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Comparative and International Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999221128474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study investigates the challenges faced by Pakistani and Chinese English language instructors in developing communicative competence among senior high school students, and highlights the fundamental loopholes. Employing a thematic analysis within a qualitative comparative case study, the findings reveal learners’ substandard prior knowledge as the biggest loophole in both Pakistan and China, which causes instructors to overuse local languages. There exists misalignment in curriculum, instruction, and assessment; consequently, the instructional practices are drastically examination-oriented producing rote-learners, and significantly hamper the development of communicative competence. Pakistani syllabi appear to be outdated. There is unavailability of modern linguistic resources in Pakistan while the Chinese instructors evade using them despite their availability. Chinese teacher-student interaction and Pakistani parental involvement are bleak. Findings suggest that respective governments should pay attention to their junior high school systems for developing students’ prerequisite knowledge and implement leaner-centered instruction. Pakistani senior high school syllabi should be modified.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语交际能力发展的漏洞:巴基斯坦和中国的比较案例研究
本研究调查了巴基斯坦和中国的英语教师在培养高中生交际能力方面所面临的挑战,并指出了其中的根本漏洞。在定性比较案例研究中采用专题分析,研究结果表明,巴基斯坦和中国学习者不合格的先验知识是最大的漏洞,这导致教师过度使用当地语言。在课程设置、教学和评价方面存在偏差;因此,教学实践以考试为导向,培养死记硬背的学习者,严重阻碍了交际能力的发展。巴基斯坦的教学大纲似乎过时了。巴基斯坦缺乏现代语言资源,而中国教师则回避使用这些资源。中国的师生互动和巴基斯坦的家长参与都很惨淡。研究结果表明,各国政府应重视初中教育系统对学生基础知识的培养,实施以学习者为中心的教学。巴基斯坦高中教学大纲应该修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Comparative and International Education
Research in Comparative and International Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Research in Comparative and International Education is a peer-reviewed international journal, edited by Hubert Ertl of the University of Oxford, assisted by an Editorial Board and an International Advisory Board of international scholars with a wide range of expertise in comparative and international studies.
期刊最新文献
The adoption of dual Vocational Education and Training in Spain: Analysis of descentralised decision-making in educational policy transfer International partnership of Japanese university: Reciprocity and stratification of study abroad Factors that play a role in international PhD candidates’ social experiences with inclusion and integration in an international learning environment: A narrative inquiry in a Dutch research university Lifelong education policies in Europe and Latin America Looking at Ukrainian technical and vocational education and training before the war: Consequences of a meritocratic orientation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1