Observing Two Reading Intervention Programs for Students with Dyslexia

IF 0.6 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Exceptionality Pub Date : 2021-06-27 DOI:10.1080/09362835.2021.1938067
Colby Hall, Katlynn Dahl‐Leonard, Grace Cannon
{"title":"Observing Two Reading Intervention Programs for Students with Dyslexia","authors":"Colby Hall, Katlynn Dahl‐Leonard, Grace Cannon","doi":"10.1080/09362835.2021.1938067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This exploratory study examined the nature of instruction provided in two reading intervention programs designed for elementary-grade students with dyslexia (The Multisensory Teaching Approach and Reading RULES!). In addition to documenting the proportion of time dedicated to particular content components (i.e., letter-name knowledge, phonological awareness, phonics/decoding, encoding, sight word recognition, passage reading/fluency, comprehension, vocabulary), the research team also documented the degree to which instruction (a) included teacher explanation/modeling, guided practice, group practice, and individual practice, (b) addressed particular types of decoding/encoding procedures, including multi-sensory (defined as tactile/kinesthetic) procedures and use of orthographic rules, and (c) made use of given instructional materials. The team conducted 12, ~45-minute observations. There were many similarities between the two programs (e.g., both were explicit, systematic, and sequential; both included curriculum-based measures of student learning that informed instruction; both dedicated approximately equal amounts of time to decoding and encoding instruction). However, our observations indicated a statistically significant difference between the programs (p < .002) in proportion of time dedicated to letter-name knowledge, text reading, and comprehension instruction. The programs also differed in their emphasis on articulating/applying orthographic rules and on particular procedures for decoding and encoding words.","PeriodicalId":46668,"journal":{"name":"Exceptionality","volume":"30 1","pages":"109 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09362835.2021.1938067","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptionality","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2021.1938067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT This exploratory study examined the nature of instruction provided in two reading intervention programs designed for elementary-grade students with dyslexia (The Multisensory Teaching Approach and Reading RULES!). In addition to documenting the proportion of time dedicated to particular content components (i.e., letter-name knowledge, phonological awareness, phonics/decoding, encoding, sight word recognition, passage reading/fluency, comprehension, vocabulary), the research team also documented the degree to which instruction (a) included teacher explanation/modeling, guided practice, group practice, and individual practice, (b) addressed particular types of decoding/encoding procedures, including multi-sensory (defined as tactile/kinesthetic) procedures and use of orthographic rules, and (c) made use of given instructional materials. The team conducted 12, ~45-minute observations. There were many similarities between the two programs (e.g., both were explicit, systematic, and sequential; both included curriculum-based measures of student learning that informed instruction; both dedicated approximately equal amounts of time to decoding and encoding instruction). However, our observations indicated a statistically significant difference between the programs (p < .002) in proportion of time dedicated to letter-name knowledge, text reading, and comprehension instruction. The programs also differed in their emphasis on articulating/applying orthographic rules and on particular procedures for decoding and encoding words.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
观察阅读障碍学生的两种阅读干预方案
摘要这项探索性研究考察了两个为有阅读障碍的小学学生设计的阅读干预项目(多传感器教学法和阅读规则!)中提供的教学性质。除了记录专用于特定内容组成部分(即字母名称知识、语音意识、语音/解码、编码、视觉单词识别、段落阅读/流利性、理解、词汇)的时间比例外,研究团队还记录了教学(a)包括教师解释/建模、指导实践、集体实践,和个人实践,(b)处理特定类型的解码/编码程序,包括多感官(定义为触觉/动觉)程序和正交规则的使用,以及(c)使用给定的教学材料。研究小组进行了12到45分钟的观察。这两个项目有很多相似之处(例如,两者都是明确的、系统的和顺序的;两者都包括基于课程的学生学习措施,为教学提供信息;两者都为解码和编码教学投入了大致相等的时间)。然而,我们的观察结果表明,在字母名称知识、文本阅读和理解教学的时间比例方面,两个项目之间存在统计学上的显著差异(p<.002)。这些程序在强调发音/应用拼写规则以及解码和编码单词的特定程序方面也有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Exceptionality
Exceptionality EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Experiences of Teachers of Students with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic The Effectiveness of Teaching High-Risk Cooking Skills with Video Models to Individuals with Intellectual Disability Legal Analysis of the Interpretation of Adapted Physical Education in US Law Examining Similarities and Differences in Parent Advocacy During Early Intervention and School Services What Does a Useful Practitioner Journal Article Look Like? Perceptions of Preservice Teacher Candidates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1