Technical methods of national security supervision: Grain storage security as an example

IF 3.7 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 安全科学与韧性(英文) Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.09.004
Yudie Jianyao , Qi Zhang , Liang Ge , Jianguo Chen
{"title":"Technical methods of national security supervision: Grain storage security as an example","authors":"Yudie Jianyao ,&nbsp;Qi Zhang ,&nbsp;Liang Ge ,&nbsp;Jianguo Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Grain security guarantees national security. China has many widely distributed grain depots to supervise grain storage security. However, this has led to a lack of regulatory capacity and manpower. Amid the development of reserve-level information technology, big data supervision of grain storage security should be improved. This study proposes big data research architecture and an analysis model for grain storage security; as an example, it illustrates the supervision of the grain loss problem in storage security. The statistical analysis model and the prediction and clustering-based model for grain loss supervision were used to mine abnormal data. A combination of feature extraction and feature selection reduction methods were chosen for dimensionality. A comparative analysis showed that the nonlinear prediction model performed better on the grain loss data set, with <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> of 87.21%, 87.83%, 91.97%, and 89.40% for Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR), Random Forest, Decision Tree, XGBoost regression on test sets, respectively. Nineteen abnormal data were filtered out by GBR combined with residuals as an example. The deep learning model had the best performance on the mean absolute error, with an <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> of 85.14% on the test set and only one abnormal data identified. This is contrary to the original intention of finding as many anomalies as possible for supervisory purposes. Five classes were generated using principal component analysis dimensionality reduction combined with Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) clustering, with 11 anomalous data points screened by adding the amount of normalized grain loss. Based on the existing grain information system, this paper provides a supervision model for grain storage that can help mine abnormal data. Unlike the current post-event supervision model, this study proposes a pre-event supervision model. This study provides a framework of ideas for subsequent scholarly research; the addition of big data technology will help improve efficient supervisory capacity in the field of grain supervision.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":62710,"journal":{"name":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449622000500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Grain security guarantees national security. China has many widely distributed grain depots to supervise grain storage security. However, this has led to a lack of regulatory capacity and manpower. Amid the development of reserve-level information technology, big data supervision of grain storage security should be improved. This study proposes big data research architecture and an analysis model for grain storage security; as an example, it illustrates the supervision of the grain loss problem in storage security. The statistical analysis model and the prediction and clustering-based model for grain loss supervision were used to mine abnormal data. A combination of feature extraction and feature selection reduction methods were chosen for dimensionality. A comparative analysis showed that the nonlinear prediction model performed better on the grain loss data set, with R2 of 87.21%, 87.83%, 91.97%, and 89.40% for Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR), Random Forest, Decision Tree, XGBoost regression on test sets, respectively. Nineteen abnormal data were filtered out by GBR combined with residuals as an example. The deep learning model had the best performance on the mean absolute error, with an R2 of 85.14% on the test set and only one abnormal data identified. This is contrary to the original intention of finding as many anomalies as possible for supervisory purposes. Five classes were generated using principal component analysis dimensionality reduction combined with Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) clustering, with 11 anomalous data points screened by adding the amount of normalized grain loss. Based on the existing grain information system, this paper provides a supervision model for grain storage that can help mine abnormal data. Unlike the current post-event supervision model, this study proposes a pre-event supervision model. This study provides a framework of ideas for subsequent scholarly research; the addition of big data technology will help improve efficient supervisory capacity in the field of grain supervision.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家安全监管的技术方法——以粮食仓储安全为例
粮食安全保障国家安全。中国有许多分布广泛的粮库,以监督粮食储存安全。然而,这导致了监管能力和人力的缺乏。在储备级信息技术发展的背景下,加强粮食储备安全大数据监管。提出粮食仓储安全大数据研究架构和分析模型;并以仓储安全中粮食损失问题的监管为例进行了说明。利用统计分析模型和基于预测聚类的粮食损失监测模型对异常数据进行挖掘。维数选择了特征提取和特征选择约简相结合的方法。对比分析表明,非线性预测模型在粮食损失数据集上表现较好,梯度增强回归(Gradient Boosting Regressor, GBR)、随机森林(Random Forest)、决策树(Decision Tree)和XGBoost回归在测试集上的R2分别为87.21%、87.83%、91.97%和89.40%。以GBR结合残差法对19条异常数据进行了滤波。深度学习模型在平均绝对误差上表现最好,在测试集上R2为85.14%,仅识别出1个异常数据。这与为了监督目的尽可能多地发现异常情况的初衷背道而驰。采用主成分分析降维结合基于密度的空间聚类(DBSCAN)聚类方法生成了5个类,并通过添加归一化颗粒损失量筛选了11个异常数据点。在现有粮食信息系统的基础上,提出了一种能够挖掘异常数据的粮食仓储监管模型。与现有的事后监督模型不同,本研究提出了事前监督模型。本研究为后续的学术研究提供了一个思路框架;大数据技术的加入将有助于提高粮食监管领域的高效监管能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
安全科学与韧性(英文)
安全科学与韧性(英文) Management Science and Operations Research, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Safety Research
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
期刊最新文献
Grasping emergency dynamics: A review of group evacuation techniques and strategies in major emergencies Multi-factor coupled forest fire model based on cellular automata Scenario construction and vulnerability assessment of natural hazards-triggered power grid accidents Risk assessment of fire casualty in underground commercial building based on FFTA-BN model Determination of individual disaster resilience levels of hospital staff: A case study of Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1