Reconsidering the Definition of the Term

Siergiej V. Grinev-Griniewicz, E. Sorokina, Maria M. Molchanova
{"title":"Reconsidering the Definition of the Term","authors":"Siergiej V. Grinev-Griniewicz, E. Sorokina, Maria M. Molchanova","doi":"10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-3-710-729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing definitions of the term as presented in current terminological writings are analyzed in the paper. The linguistic material is the descriptions of the notion of “term” that could be seen in the works of leading terminologists; these descriptions exemplify the importance of the notion in question and at the same time highlight the diversity in interpreting its essence. Achieving the goal of the analysis - which is to reveal the reasons why the term is still being treated in such an ambiguous way and define the substantial features of this notion - promotes explicitness in the interpretation of the term and its usage in a universally recognized way. The result of the undertaken study achieved on the basis of comparative, diachronic, and contrastive approaches is working out the comprehensive definition of the troublesome notion “term” that could be treated as its main one. The theoretical significance of the research is finding out the most common features of the term as the basic notion of terminology studies. The results of the study further expand the ideas regarding the notion of the term that exist in current terminological theory and are believed to put an end to the unproductive multiplying of its definitions. The practical value of the study is viewed as using its materials and results in practical activities of scientists who work in the sphere of theoretical and applied terminology as well as educationists who teach general and special linguistics, terminology studies, lexicology, and anthropological linguistics.","PeriodicalId":52389,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-3-710-729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Existing definitions of the term as presented in current terminological writings are analyzed in the paper. The linguistic material is the descriptions of the notion of “term” that could be seen in the works of leading terminologists; these descriptions exemplify the importance of the notion in question and at the same time highlight the diversity in interpreting its essence. Achieving the goal of the analysis - which is to reveal the reasons why the term is still being treated in such an ambiguous way and define the substantial features of this notion - promotes explicitness in the interpretation of the term and its usage in a universally recognized way. The result of the undertaken study achieved on the basis of comparative, diachronic, and contrastive approaches is working out the comprehensive definition of the troublesome notion “term” that could be treated as its main one. The theoretical significance of the research is finding out the most common features of the term as the basic notion of terminology studies. The results of the study further expand the ideas regarding the notion of the term that exist in current terminological theory and are believed to put an end to the unproductive multiplying of its definitions. The practical value of the study is viewed as using its materials and results in practical activities of scientists who work in the sphere of theoretical and applied terminology as well as educationists who teach general and special linguistics, terminology studies, lexicology, and anthropological linguistics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对术语定义的再思考
本文分析了当前术语著作中对该术语的现有定义。语言材料是对“术语”概念的描述,可以在主要术语学家的作品中看到;这些描述说明了所讨论的概念的重要性,同时也突出了解释其本质的多样性。为了达到分析的目的,即揭示为什么这个术语仍然被如此模糊地对待,并界定这个概念的实质特征,就会以一种普遍认可的方式促进对这个术语的解释及其用法的明确性。在比较、历时和对比方法的基础上所进行的研究的结果是对“术语”这个棘手的概念进行了全面的定义,并可作为其主要概念。作为术语研究的基本概念,本研究的理论意义在于找出术语最普遍的特征。研究结果进一步拓展了目前术语理论中存在的关于术语概念的观点,并被认为将结束其定义的无效倍增。这项研究的实用价值被视为在理论和应用术语领域工作的科学家以及教授一般和特殊语言学、术语研究、词汇学和人类学语言学的教育家的实际活动中使用其材料和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics
RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Re-thinking Semiotics: a New Categorization of a Sign? Factors of the Dynamics of Language Situations in the Regions of Russia on the example of the Arkhangelsk Region, the Perm Region and the Udmurt Republic Emotions in the Mental and Linguistic Space of Lyric Poems Specifics of Lexical and Grammatical Rules in the Chinese Language Textual Microfields WINTER and MAN in Short Stories by Soviet Writer Yuri Shamshurin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1