Looking back on Online data Collection Through Mindful Reflection

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods Pub Date : 2022-11-08 DOI:10.34190/ejbrm.20.3.2930
Margaret Mangion
{"title":"Looking back on Online data Collection Through Mindful Reflection","authors":"Margaret Mangion","doi":"10.34190/ejbrm.20.3.2930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reflections emerging from what was learned from conducting online research by using an online survey administered to primary school pupils during the Covid-19 pandemic are presented in this paper. First, a brief review of relevant literature is outlined.  Secondly, the advantages and limitations of conducting online research are addressed.  An overview of the research process employed including the sample, measures used and procedures employed for ethics clearance are how online research was made possible during a pandemic was explored. The main challenges were: (a) parental engagement and the subsequent collection of consent forms; (b) the actual data acquisition itself.  These issues and others are explored through a reflection process using the cycle outlined by Gibbs (1988).  The paper also points out how the reflective process was applied throughout the project. The study is focused on how pupils aged between 9 – 11 years perceived their own creative self-concept and their wellbeing at school.  In this quantitative study, five hundred and thirty pupils were recruited through their schools following the dissemination of information letters and consent forms.  While various advantages emerged from conducting online research, this approach was not without problems.    Finally, this study presented an opportunity for learning and growth for the author through a process of reflection and evaluation. ","PeriodicalId":38532,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/ejbrm.20.3.2930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reflections emerging from what was learned from conducting online research by using an online survey administered to primary school pupils during the Covid-19 pandemic are presented in this paper. First, a brief review of relevant literature is outlined.  Secondly, the advantages and limitations of conducting online research are addressed.  An overview of the research process employed including the sample, measures used and procedures employed for ethics clearance are how online research was made possible during a pandemic was explored. The main challenges were: (a) parental engagement and the subsequent collection of consent forms; (b) the actual data acquisition itself.  These issues and others are explored through a reflection process using the cycle outlined by Gibbs (1988).  The paper also points out how the reflective process was applied throughout the project. The study is focused on how pupils aged between 9 – 11 years perceived their own creative self-concept and their wellbeing at school.  In this quantitative study, five hundred and thirty pupils were recruited through their schools following the dissemination of information letters and consent forms.  While various advantages emerged from conducting online research, this approach was not without problems.    Finally, this study presented an opportunity for learning and growth for the author through a process of reflection and evaluation. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过正念反思回顾在线数据收集
本文介绍了在新冠肺炎大流行期间,通过对小学生进行在线调查,从进行在线研究中学到的一些思考。首先,简要回顾了相关文献。其次,论述了开展在线研究的优势和局限性。对所采用的研究过程进行了概述,包括样本、所采用的措施和伦理审查程序,探讨了在疫情期间如何使在线研究成为可能。主要挑战是:(a)父母参与和随后收集同意书;(b) 实际数据采集本身。这些问题和其他问题是通过使用Gibbs(1988)概述的周期的反思过程来探索的。论文还指出了反思过程是如何在整个项目中应用的。这项研究的重点是9-11岁的学生如何看待他们自己的创造性自我概念和他们在学校的幸福感。在这项定量研究中,在传播信息函和同意书后,通过学校招募了530名学生。虽然进行在线研究产生了各种优势,但这种方法并非没有问题。最后,本研究通过反思和评价的过程,为作者提供了一个学习和成长的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods
Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods (EJBRM) provides perspectives on topics relevant to research methods applied in the field of business and management. Through its publication the journal contributes to the development of theory and practice. The journal accepts academically robust papers that contribute to the area of research methods applied in business and management research. Papers submitted to the journal are double-blind reviewed by members of the reviewer committee or other suitably qualified readers. The Editor reserves the right to reject papers that, in the view of the editorial board, are either of insufficient quality, or are not relevant enough to the subject area. The editor is happy to discuss contributions before submission. The journal publishes work in the categories described below. Research Papers: These may be qualitative or quantitative, empirical or theoretical in nature and can discuss completed research findings or work in progress. Case Studies: Case studies are welcomed illustrating business and management research methods in practise. View Points: View points are less academically rigorous articles usually in areas of controversy which will fuel some interesting debate. Conference Reports and Book Reviews: Anyone who attends a conference or reads a book that they feel contributes to the area of Business Research Methods is encouraged to submit a review for publication.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling Endogeneity: A Systematic Review of Methodologies in Digital Leadership and Remote Work Research Double Bias of Mistakes: Essence, Consequences, and Measurement Method Statistically Validating a Theory Represented by a Venn Diagram How Cognitive Biases Influence Problematic Research Methods Practices Using Mixed Methods to Understand Tax Compliance Behaviour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1