Did the Church replace Israel? The foundation of the Church and Israel

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION Nova Prisutnost Pub Date : 2022-11-16 DOI:10.31192/np.20.3.1
Paweł Rabczyński
{"title":"Did the Church replace Israel? The foundation of the Church and Israel","authors":"Paweł Rabczyński","doi":"10.31192/np.20.3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the relationship between the establishment of the Church and Israel. The author tries to answer a question that is important for contemporary theology: Did the Church replace Israel? The paper also poses another question that correlates with the first: Were the chosen people of the Old Testament “disinherited” upon the foundation of the Ecclesia? Of fundamental importance for understanding the Church–Israel relations is the teaching of the Second Vatican Council, mainly its Declaration on the relations of the Church with non-Christian religions Nostra aetate (No. 4). It treats these relations from the history of salvation perspective, indicating a continuum between God’s old and new people. The document does not specify the mutual reference or deals with the soteriological status of the people of Old Covenant. In order to reveal the Church’s attitude to Israel, the author examined Jesus’ reference to the Torah and the key events in the work of the Church foundation: constituting of the Twelve and establishing of the Eucharist. They provide grounds for the claim that the Church is the Israel of the ultimate times. Regarding the Church-Israel relations from the perspective of the history of salvation provides the conclusion that God did not reject Israel, nor did He cancel its mission of the tradent of the revelation. The people of the Old Testament remained the carrier of what was fulfilled in Jesus Christ in the economy of salvation. Israel’s “disinheritance” did not occur upon the Ecclesia foundation.","PeriodicalId":52045,"journal":{"name":"Nova Prisutnost","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nova Prisutnost","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31192/np.20.3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the relationship between the establishment of the Church and Israel. The author tries to answer a question that is important for contemporary theology: Did the Church replace Israel? The paper also poses another question that correlates with the first: Were the chosen people of the Old Testament “disinherited” upon the foundation of the Ecclesia? Of fundamental importance for understanding the Church–Israel relations is the teaching of the Second Vatican Council, mainly its Declaration on the relations of the Church with non-Christian religions Nostra aetate (No. 4). It treats these relations from the history of salvation perspective, indicating a continuum between God’s old and new people. The document does not specify the mutual reference or deals with the soteriological status of the people of Old Covenant. In order to reveal the Church’s attitude to Israel, the author examined Jesus’ reference to the Torah and the key events in the work of the Church foundation: constituting of the Twelve and establishing of the Eucharist. They provide grounds for the claim that the Church is the Israel of the ultimate times. Regarding the Church-Israel relations from the perspective of the history of salvation provides the conclusion that God did not reject Israel, nor did He cancel its mission of the tradent of the revelation. The people of the Old Testament remained the carrier of what was fulfilled in Jesus Christ in the economy of salvation. Israel’s “disinheritance” did not occur upon the Ecclesia foundation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教会取代了以色列吗?教会和以色列的根基
本文介绍了教会的建立与以色列之间的关系。作者试图回答一个对当代神学很重要的问题:教会取代了以色列吗?这篇论文还提出了另一个与第一个问题相关的问题:《旧约》中被选中的人是否在教会的基础上被“剥夺了继承权”?理解教会与以色列关系的根本重要性在于梵蒂冈第二次理事会的教学,主要是其关于教会与非基督教宗教Nostra aetate关系的宣言(第4号)。它从救赎的历史角度来看待这些关系,表明上帝的新老人民之间是一个连续体。该文件没有具体说明相互参照,也没有涉及《旧盟约》人民的特殊地位。为了揭示教会对以色列的态度,作者考察了耶稣对《托拉》的提及以及教会基金会工作中的关键事件:十二人的组成和圣餐的确立。他们为声称教会是终极时代的以色列提供了理由。从救赎历史的角度看待教会与以色列的关系,可以得出这样的结论:上帝没有拒绝以色列,也没有取消其启示贸易的使命。旧约中的人民仍然是耶稣基督在拯救经济中所实现的东西的载体。以色列的“剥夺继承权”并没有发生在教会基金会上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nova Prisutnost
Nova Prisutnost RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Education in Ancient India as a Possible Inspiration for the Future Percepcija uloge i osobina razrednika u hrvatskom obrazovnom sustavu Priče i pripovijedanje u ranom učenju engleskoga jezika – komparativna analiza Pripremljenost budućih učitelja razredne nastave i učitelja stranih jezika za ophođenje s različitosti u primarnom obrazovanju Važnost i aktualnost tragične misli u kontekstu starih i novih ideologija progresa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1