The forced assimilation Gypsy policy in Socialist Hungary

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY Romani Studies Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.3828/rs.2020.3
Tamás Hajnáczky
{"title":"The forced assimilation Gypsy policy in Socialist Hungary","authors":"Tamás Hajnáczky","doi":"10.3828/rs.2020.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The aim of this study is to present the Hungarian Gypsy policies of the Socialist era based on sources from the archives, contemporary period studies written by clerks, and academic literature published after the regime change. In my article I mainly focus on summarizing the data, as in my view, it would take further research to evaluate the era’s Gypsy policies in a concise way. Already in the early years of the Socialist era the government forbade any and all individual initiatives or ideas going against the regime’s official narrative and ruling ideology. Centralization, and increasing governmental censorship popped up in various areas of life, such as in industrial and agricultural collectivization. From this none of the ethnic communities could be exempt, thus shortly – though it took a decade – the isolation of the Gypsy community caught the authorities’ eye; they were reined in under the same laws and regulations together with other people. The regime wanted to make Gypsies into socialist men and women with socialist ethics by forbidding their culture and language; to this end Lenin himself once gave several instructions to the authorities (e.g. unconditional acceptance of Marxism-Leninism, loyalty to the Party, partaking in class war, communist consciousness), of which the one outstanding honor was organized work for the community, while the biggest sin was individualism.","PeriodicalId":52533,"journal":{"name":"Romani Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romani Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/rs.2020.3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The aim of this study is to present the Hungarian Gypsy policies of the Socialist era based on sources from the archives, contemporary period studies written by clerks, and academic literature published after the regime change. In my article I mainly focus on summarizing the data, as in my view, it would take further research to evaluate the era’s Gypsy policies in a concise way. Already in the early years of the Socialist era the government forbade any and all individual initiatives or ideas going against the regime’s official narrative and ruling ideology. Centralization, and increasing governmental censorship popped up in various areas of life, such as in industrial and agricultural collectivization. From this none of the ethnic communities could be exempt, thus shortly – though it took a decade – the isolation of the Gypsy community caught the authorities’ eye; they were reined in under the same laws and regulations together with other people. The regime wanted to make Gypsies into socialist men and women with socialist ethics by forbidding their culture and language; to this end Lenin himself once gave several instructions to the authorities (e.g. unconditional acceptance of Marxism-Leninism, loyalty to the Party, partaking in class war, communist consciousness), of which the one outstanding honor was organized work for the community, while the biggest sin was individualism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
匈牙利社会主义时期吉普赛人的强制同化政策
摘要:本研究的目的是根据档案、职员撰写的当代研究以及政权更迭后发表的学术文献,介绍社会主义时代的匈牙利吉普赛人政策。在我的文章中,我主要集中于总结数据,因为在我看来,需要进一步的研究才能简明扼要地评估那个时代的吉普赛政策。早在社会主义时代的早期,政府就禁止任何和所有违背政权官方叙事和统治意识形态的个人倡议或想法。在生活的各个领域,如工业和农业集体化,出现了中央集权和日益加强的政府审查。没有一个民族社区可以免于这种情况,因此,尽管花了十年时间,吉普赛社区的孤立很快引起了当局的注意;他们和其他人一起受到同样的法律法规的约束。该政权希望通过禁止吉普赛人的文化和语言,使他们成为具有社会主义道德的社会主义男女;为此,列宁本人曾向当局发出过几项指示(如无条件接受马克思列宁主义、对党忠诚、参加阶级战争、共产主义意识),其中最突出的荣誉是为社会组织工作,最大的罪过是个人主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Romani Studies
Romani Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Founded in 1888, the Journal of the Gypsy Lore Society was published in four series up to 1982. In 2000, the journal became Romani Studies. On behalf of the Gypsy Lore Society, Romani Studies features articles on many different communities which, regardless of their origins and self-appellations in various languages, have been referred to in English as Gypsies. These communities include the descendants of migrants from the Indian subcontinent which have been considered as falling into three large subdivisions, Dom, Lom, and Rom. The field has also included communities of other origins which practice, or in the past have practiced, a specific type of service nomadism. The journal publishes articles in history, anthropology, ethnography, sociology, linguistics, art, literature, folklore and music, as well as reviews of books and audiovisual materials.
期刊最新文献
Invincible racism? The misuse of genetically informed arguments against Roma in Central and Eastern Europe Editorial: Epistemologies in Romani studies: Moving beyond othering otherness Fashion and pilgrimage: Discourses constructing Romani identity Discursive subjugation and the ways out: Narratives of othering among Czech Roma mothers Romani American history: Historical absences and their consequences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1