Economic analysis of conspicuous waste: historical overview and modern approaches

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS Voprosy Ekonomiki Pub Date : 2023-04-05 DOI:10.32609/0042-8736-2023-4-119-134
T. M. Shishkina
{"title":"Economic analysis of conspicuous waste: historical overview and modern approaches","authors":"T. M. Shishkina","doi":"10.32609/0042-8736-2023-4-119-134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both conspicuous waste practices and their analysis have undergone significant changes since Veblen first defined them in his “Theory of leisure class” over a century ago. The article provides a comparative interdisciplinary overview of the approaches to the analysis of the economic practices of conspicuous waste. The first part of the article focuses on original approach to conspicuous waste that was proposed by Veblen, who suggested that such waste allows economic agents to maximize a special kind of utility. As this approach assumes that conspicuous waste works as a quasi-language system where the information about social status and wealth of the person is being coded, transferred and decoded, the article suggests naming it “semiotic approach”. The next part of the article considers the development of this approach in the works by Galbraith, Baudrillard, and Douglas and Isherwood. Both advantages and limitations of this approach are being considered, and possible alternative approach, based on the application of behavioral economics, is being suggested. The final part of the article provides an application of the received findings to the analysis of the modern digitalized practices of conspicuous leisure. Thus, the article examines the influence of digitalization on the dynamics between conspicuous consumption and leisure, the ways economic practices of conspicuous waste have changed within the framework of social media, and the impact of this change on the modern labour/leisure balance.","PeriodicalId":45534,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-4-119-134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both conspicuous waste practices and their analysis have undergone significant changes since Veblen first defined them in his “Theory of leisure class” over a century ago. The article provides a comparative interdisciplinary overview of the approaches to the analysis of the economic practices of conspicuous waste. The first part of the article focuses on original approach to conspicuous waste that was proposed by Veblen, who suggested that such waste allows economic agents to maximize a special kind of utility. As this approach assumes that conspicuous waste works as a quasi-language system where the information about social status and wealth of the person is being coded, transferred and decoded, the article suggests naming it “semiotic approach”. The next part of the article considers the development of this approach in the works by Galbraith, Baudrillard, and Douglas and Isherwood. Both advantages and limitations of this approach are being considered, and possible alternative approach, based on the application of behavioral economics, is being suggested. The final part of the article provides an application of the received findings to the analysis of the modern digitalized practices of conspicuous leisure. Thus, the article examines the influence of digitalization on the dynamics between conspicuous consumption and leisure, the ways economic practices of conspicuous waste have changed within the framework of social media, and the impact of this change on the modern labour/leisure balance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
炫耀性浪费的经济分析:历史回顾与现代方法
自从一个多世纪前凡勃伦在他的“有闲阶级理论”中首次定义了炫耀性浪费行为及其分析以来,它们都发生了重大变化。本文对炫耀性浪费的经济实践分析方法进行了跨学科的比较综述。文章的第一部分重点介绍了Veblen提出的关于炫耀性浪费的原始方法,他认为这种浪费允许经济主体最大化一种特殊的效用。由于这种方法假设炫耀性浪费是一种准语言系统,在这种系统中,有关个人社会地位和财富的信息被编码、传递和解码,文章建议将其命名为“符号学方法”。本文的下一部分将考虑这种方法在加尔布雷斯、鲍德里亚、道格拉斯和伊舍伍德的作品中的发展。目前正在考虑这种方法的优点和局限性,并根据行为经济学的应用提出可能的替代方法。文章的最后一部分提供了将收到的发现应用于分析现代数字化的炫耀性休闲实践。因此,本文考察了数字化对炫耀性消费和休闲之间动态的影响,社交媒体框架下炫耀性浪费的经济实践方式的变化,以及这种变化对现代劳动/休闲平衡的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Ekonomiki
Voprosy Ekonomiki ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
86
期刊最新文献
Determinants of public spending composition in the Russian regions Soaring public debt: Return of financial repression and high inflation? Knowledge-based view of the firm and the phenomenon of knowledge encapsulation Economic education as a mirror of interdisciplinary discourse Microfoundations of dominance of fundamentalism in economic policy: Is there an antidote?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1