Critical discussion of the current environmental risk assessment (ERA) of veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) in the European Union, considering changes in animal husbandry

IF 6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 Environmental Science Environmental Sciences Europe Pub Date : 2021-11-16 DOI:10.1186/s12302-021-00554-3
Ruth Haupt, Céline Heinemann, Jason Jeremia Hayer, Simone Magdalene Schmid, Miriam Guse, Ramona Bleeser, Julia Steinhoff-Wagner
{"title":"Critical discussion of the current environmental risk assessment (ERA) of veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) in the European Union, considering changes in animal husbandry","authors":"Ruth Haupt,&nbsp;Céline Heinemann,&nbsp;Jason Jeremia Hayer,&nbsp;Simone Magdalene Schmid,&nbsp;Miriam Guse,&nbsp;Ramona Bleeser,&nbsp;Julia Steinhoff-Wagner","doi":"10.1186/s12302-021-00554-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) administered to livestock might affect the environment. Therefore, an environmental risk assessment (ERA) is conducted during the approval process of VMPs. In the European Union (EU), the ERA, which was established approximately 10 years ago, consists of two phases. In the present review, we examined the first phase. In this phase, VMPs are subjected to a decision-making process comprising 19 questions and several tables with default values published in the “Guideline on environmental impact assessment for veterinary medicinal products in support of the VICH guidelines GL6 and GL38 (European Medicines Agency 2016).”</p><p>Since a proportion of livestock husbandry systems is currently shifting toward ecological husbandry and free-range production systems, there is a lower risk of VMP consumption in general, but livestock excretions possibly containing VMPs might be directly released into the environment instead of being stored and applied as manure. In the present study, the first phase of the current ERA of VMPs in the EU was critically discussed with respect to the changes in animal husbandry. The large number of default values used in the ERA were checked for topicality. In a three-step approach, firstly trends and changes in animal husbandry in Europe that might be relevant for the ERA were collected, secondly, the interactions between Phase I and animal husbandry were evaluated and thirdly, the default values used in Phase I were verified in order to identify research gaps.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Several default values used in the current ERA were identified as outdated. Together with the lack of valid data (e.g., on animal husbandry systems or VMP treatments), this may have an impact on the predicted environmental concentration (PEC) as the central decision threshold of the ERA.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of the present study indicate that an update of the ERA of VMPs in the EU is required to consider the changes in animal husbandry. Several aspects related to this issue are critically discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54293,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-021-00554-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-021-00554-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) administered to livestock might affect the environment. Therefore, an environmental risk assessment (ERA) is conducted during the approval process of VMPs. In the European Union (EU), the ERA, which was established approximately 10 years ago, consists of two phases. In the present review, we examined the first phase. In this phase, VMPs are subjected to a decision-making process comprising 19 questions and several tables with default values published in the “Guideline on environmental impact assessment for veterinary medicinal products in support of the VICH guidelines GL6 and GL38 (European Medicines Agency 2016).”

Since a proportion of livestock husbandry systems is currently shifting toward ecological husbandry and free-range production systems, there is a lower risk of VMP consumption in general, but livestock excretions possibly containing VMPs might be directly released into the environment instead of being stored and applied as manure. In the present study, the first phase of the current ERA of VMPs in the EU was critically discussed with respect to the changes in animal husbandry. The large number of default values used in the ERA were checked for topicality. In a three-step approach, firstly trends and changes in animal husbandry in Europe that might be relevant for the ERA were collected, secondly, the interactions between Phase I and animal husbandry were evaluated and thirdly, the default values used in Phase I were verified in order to identify research gaps.

Results

Several default values used in the current ERA were identified as outdated. Together with the lack of valid data (e.g., on animal husbandry systems or VMP treatments), this may have an impact on the predicted environmental concentration (PEC) as the central decision threshold of the ERA.

Conclusions

The results of the present study indicate that an update of the ERA of VMPs in the EU is required to consider the changes in animal husbandry. Several aspects related to this issue are critically discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑到畜牧业的变化,对欧盟兽药产品(VMPs)当前环境风险评估(ERA)进行了批判性讨论
背景用于牲畜的兽药产品(VMP)可能会对环境造成影响。因此,在 VMP 的审批过程中要进行环境风险评估 (ERA)。在欧盟(EU),ERA 约在 10 年前建立,包括两个阶段。在本次审查中,我们对第一阶段进行了审查。在这一阶段,VMP 需要经过一个决策过程,其中包括 19 个问题和几个表格,这些表格的默认值发布在 "支持 VICH 指南 GL6 和 GL38 的兽药产品环境影响评估指南(欧洲药品管理局,2016 年)"中。"由于目前有一部分畜牧系统正在向生态畜牧和散养生产系统转变,因此一般来说,VMP 的消费风险较低,但可能含有 VMP 的牲畜排泄物可能会直接排放到环境中,而不是作为粪肥储存和施用。在本研究中,针对畜牧业的变化,对欧盟当前 VMP ERA 的第一阶段进行了批判性讨论。对 ERA 中使用的大量默认值进行了专题检查。采用三步法,首先收集可能与 ERA 相关的欧洲畜牧业趋势和变化,其次评估第一阶段与畜牧业之间的相互作用,第三验证第一阶段使用的默认值,以确定研究差距。本研究的结果表明,需要对欧盟的 VMP ERA 进行更新,以考虑到畜牧业的变化。本研究对与此问题相关的几个方面进行了批判性讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental Sciences Europe Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation. ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation. ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation. Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues. Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.
期刊最新文献
Towards the global plastic treaty: a clue to the complexity of plastics in practice Chronic toxicity testing including transcriptomics-based molecular profiling in Cloeon dipterum Environmental impact of quarrying on air quality in Ebonyi state, Nigeria How does high-speed railway affect green technology innovation? A perspective of high-quality human capital Management of links of interest in European Union expertise authorities dealing with plant protection products: comparative analysis and recommendations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1