The actual discourse of boychukizm: illustration cycle by B. Blank and M. Fradkin 1935

O. Sydor
{"title":"The actual discourse of boychukizm: illustration cycle by B. Blank and M. Fradkin 1935","authors":"O. Sydor","doi":"10.31500/2309-8813.18.2022.269719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted of detailed of analysis of the illustrative cycle of the two Ukrainian artists, followers of the Boychuk school — Ber Blank (1897–1957) and Moses Fradkin (1904–1974) to the famous novel «The Legend of Thyl Ulenspiegel and Lamme Goedzak» (1867) by Belgian novelist Charles De Coster. Their graphic interpretation is both reflection of the totalitarian contradictions of their era and challenge to its conventions. Their actual discourse is not devoid of doom: they are contemporaries of Stalinist dictatorship, they are also its victims. But they are trying metaphorically show horror of their time, embodied, for example, in the torture of the Inquisition, the persecution of dissidents. Subsequent illustrators of that novel were not so pessimistic (especially, Evgeniy Kibrik, in the future — the brilliant illustrator of Nikolay Gogol and Romain Rolland), but they paid more attention to Thyl Ulenspiegel, informal Flanders rebel leader. However, illustrative cycle of Ber Blank and Moses Fradkin is rather a novel without a hero. They prefer to depicts crowds of people engulfed in suffering (as it was accepted at Boychuk’s school). There is little resistance to the invaders, which feels doomed in 1930s. But much attention is paid to the denunciation to the representatives of the clergy (they were especially persecuted by Soviet power). It is interesting that the artists also ignored comic element of Coster’s novel, which was discovered by artists of the post-war era based on the theory of laughed culture of Mikhail Bakhtin. However, illustrative cycle of Blank and Fradkin is not only monument of its time. Long before the Second World War and Holocaust, they already foresaw the world catastrophes on the material of the European history of XVIth century. At same time, they did not abandon of expressive and decorative style characteristic of their teachers, and even continued this style, slightly modifying.","PeriodicalId":34369,"journal":{"name":"Suchasne mistetstvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suchasne mistetstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31500/2309-8813.18.2022.269719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted of detailed of analysis of the illustrative cycle of the two Ukrainian artists, followers of the Boychuk school — Ber Blank (1897–1957) and Moses Fradkin (1904–1974) to the famous novel «The Legend of Thyl Ulenspiegel and Lamme Goedzak» (1867) by Belgian novelist Charles De Coster. Their graphic interpretation is both reflection of the totalitarian contradictions of their era and challenge to its conventions. Their actual discourse is not devoid of doom: they are contemporaries of Stalinist dictatorship, they are also its victims. But they are trying metaphorically show horror of their time, embodied, for example, in the torture of the Inquisition, the persecution of dissidents. Subsequent illustrators of that novel were not so pessimistic (especially, Evgeniy Kibrik, in the future — the brilliant illustrator of Nikolay Gogol and Romain Rolland), but they paid more attention to Thyl Ulenspiegel, informal Flanders rebel leader. However, illustrative cycle of Ber Blank and Moses Fradkin is rather a novel without a hero. They prefer to depicts crowds of people engulfed in suffering (as it was accepted at Boychuk’s school). There is little resistance to the invaders, which feels doomed in 1930s. But much attention is paid to the denunciation to the representatives of the clergy (they were especially persecuted by Soviet power). It is interesting that the artists also ignored comic element of Coster’s novel, which was discovered by artists of the post-war era based on the theory of laughed culture of Mikhail Bakhtin. However, illustrative cycle of Blank and Fradkin is not only monument of its time. Long before the Second World War and Holocaust, they already foresaw the world catastrophes on the material of the European history of XVIth century. At same time, they did not abandon of expressive and decorative style characteristic of their teachers, and even continued this style, slightly modifying.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
博伊丘基兹姆的实际话语:B.布兰克和M.弗拉德1935年的插图周期
这篇文章详细分析了两位乌克兰艺术家的插图周期,他们是博伊丘克学派的追随者——贝尔·布兰克(1897-1957)和摩西·弗拉德金(1904–1974),他们是比利时小说家查尔斯·德·科斯特的著名小说《Thyl Ulenspiegel和Lamme Goedzak的传奇》(1867)的追随者。他们的图形解释既是对他们时代极权主义矛盾的反映,也是对其传统的挑战。他们的实际话语并非没有厄运:他们是斯大林独裁统治的同时代人,也是独裁统治的受害者。但他们试图隐喻性地展示他们那个时代的恐怖,例如宗教裁判所的酷刑、对异见人士的迫害。这部小说的后续插图画家并没有那么悲观(尤其是未来的叶夫根尼·基布里克——尼古拉·果戈理和罗曼·罗兰的杰出插图画家),但他们更关注非正式的佛兰德斯叛军领袖Thyl Ulenspiegel。然而,贝尔·布兰克和摩西·弗拉德金的插图循环是一部没有英雄的小说。他们更喜欢描绘被苦难吞噬的人群(正如博伊丘克的学校所接受的那样)。对入侵者几乎没有抵抗力,这在20世纪30年代是注定要失败的。但人们非常关注对神职人员代表的谴责(他们尤其受到苏联政权的迫害)。有趣的是,艺术家们也忽略了科斯特小说中的喜剧元素,这是战后艺术家们基于米哈伊尔·巴赫金的笑文化理论而发现的。然而,Blank和Fradkin的例证循环并不是那个时代的唯一纪念碑。早在第二次世界大战和大屠杀之前,他们就已经在十六世纪欧洲历史的材料上预见到了世界灾难。同时,他们并没有放弃老师的表现和装饰风格,甚至延续了这种风格,略有修饰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mythopoetics of Borys Liatoshynsky’s 1910–1930s: the wagnerian context Discourse “academic — experimental”: theory and practice On the issue of organizing and holding music festivals Borys Liatoshynskyi and the artists of Lviv: epistolary notes to the biography of the artist Ukraine’s civilizational offer to the world. Ideas of the noosphere and cosmic worldview in Ukrainian art of the XX–XXI centuries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1