Do Rising Tides Lift All Boats? Exploring Heterogenous Effects of Florida’s Developmental Education Reform by High School Academic Preparation

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH American Journal of Education Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI:10.1086/714244
Toby J. Park-Gaghan, Christine G. Mokher, Hayley Spencer, Shouping Hu
{"title":"Do Rising Tides Lift All Boats? Exploring Heterogenous Effects of Florida’s Developmental Education Reform by High School Academic Preparation","authors":"Toby J. Park-Gaghan, Christine G. Mokher, Hayley Spencer, Shouping Hu","doi":"10.1086/714244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Underprepared students at community colleges are often assigned to a sequence of developmental education (DE) courses that can substantially delay, or even halt, their progress to degree completion. In 2014, Florida took a drastic step forward when it implemented a comprehensive DE reform. Our findings show large, positive base effects of the reform for all students as well as heterogeneous effects by high school academic preparation. More specifically, students in the two lowest tracks of high school academic preparation—students for whom much of the reform was explicitly designed—experienced greater gains than did students in the upper two tracks. However, students in the upper tracks also experienced gains and students in the lowest track experienced the greatest gains of all. These findings suggest that when statewide DE reform was implemented in Florida, all students benefited, with the least prepared students experiencing the greatest gains.","PeriodicalId":47629,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Education","volume":"127 1","pages":"471 - 495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/714244","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/714244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Underprepared students at community colleges are often assigned to a sequence of developmental education (DE) courses that can substantially delay, or even halt, their progress to degree completion. In 2014, Florida took a drastic step forward when it implemented a comprehensive DE reform. Our findings show large, positive base effects of the reform for all students as well as heterogeneous effects by high school academic preparation. More specifically, students in the two lowest tracks of high school academic preparation—students for whom much of the reform was explicitly designed—experienced greater gains than did students in the upper two tracks. However, students in the upper tracks also experienced gains and students in the lowest track experienced the greatest gains of all. These findings suggest that when statewide DE reform was implemented in Florida, all students benefited, with the least prepared students experiencing the greatest gains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水涨船高吗?探究佛罗里达州高中学业准备发展性教育改革的异质效应
社区大学准备不足的学生经常被分配到一系列发展教育(DE)课程,这些课程可能会大大推迟甚至阻止他们完成学位的进程。2014年,佛罗里达州实施了全面的DE改革,迈出了一大步。我们的研究结果显示,改革对所有学生都产生了巨大的积极基础效应,高中学业准备也产生了异质效应。更具体地说,处于高中学业准备最低两个轨道的学生——大部分改革都是为他们明确设计的——比处于较高两个轨道上的学生获得了更大的收获。然而,排名靠前的学生也有收获,排名靠后的学生收获最大。这些发现表明,当佛罗里达州实施全州DE改革时,所有学生都从中受益,而准备最差的学生获得的收益最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Education
American Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Founded as School Review in 1893, the American Journal of Education acquired its present name in November 1979. The Journal seeks to bridge and integrate the intellectual, methodological, and substantive diversity of educational scholarship, and to encourage a vigorous dialogue between educational scholars and practitioners. To achieve that goal, papers are published that present research, theoretical statements, philosophical arguments, critical syntheses of a field of educational inquiry, and integrations of educational scholarship, policy, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Cultivating Critical Hope While Leading during Crisis: A Qualitative Cross-Comparative Analysis The Persistence of and Challenges to Whiteness in Parent Engagement The Power of the Inner Voice: Examining Self-Talk’s Relationship with Academic Outcomes “Figuring Out My Part in All of This”: Understanding Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Shaping Teacher Learning within Reform Breaking the Mold: The One Social Class Model and Saving Face among Undocumented and Mixed-Status Chinese Immigrant Families
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1