Investigating Alignment in a Quantitative Literacy Course for Social Sciences Students

Q3 Mathematics Numeracy Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.5038/1936-4660.14.2.1384
V. Frith, P. Lloyd
{"title":"Investigating Alignment in a Quantitative Literacy Course for Social Sciences Students","authors":"V. Frith, P. Lloyd","doi":"10.5038/1936-4660.14.2.1384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Numeracy Centre at the University of Cape Town has taught a one-semester quantitative literacy course for social sciences students since 1999. This study aims to provide an example for how the design of such a course can be assessed for alignment with quantitative reasoning goals. We propose a framework of learning outcomes for the course and use that framework to analyse the assessments and student performance on them. We find that just under half of the overall mark for the course was devoted to the interpretation and communication of quantitative information (our “main” outcomes), and about a quarter was devoted to the performing of calculations. The analysis revealed that statistics outcomes were under-represented in the make-up of the overall course mark, and assessment of these outcomes was restricted almost entirely to the two final examinations. The results of the analysis of the alignment between outcomes and assessment are useful to inform discussions about changes to the course curriculum. The analysis of student performance on the different outcomes provides insights which are useful for informing improvements to our teaching approach. The analysis demonstrates a relatively straightforward procedure that can be used or adapted by researchers in other institutions for ongoing monitoring of alignment between course outcomes, teaching, and assessment.","PeriodicalId":36166,"journal":{"name":"Numeracy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Numeracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.14.2.1384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Numeracy Centre at the University of Cape Town has taught a one-semester quantitative literacy course for social sciences students since 1999. This study aims to provide an example for how the design of such a course can be assessed for alignment with quantitative reasoning goals. We propose a framework of learning outcomes for the course and use that framework to analyse the assessments and student performance on them. We find that just under half of the overall mark for the course was devoted to the interpretation and communication of quantitative information (our “main” outcomes), and about a quarter was devoted to the performing of calculations. The analysis revealed that statistics outcomes were under-represented in the make-up of the overall course mark, and assessment of these outcomes was restricted almost entirely to the two final examinations. The results of the analysis of the alignment between outcomes and assessment are useful to inform discussions about changes to the course curriculum. The analysis of student performance on the different outcomes provides insights which are useful for informing improvements to our teaching approach. The analysis demonstrates a relatively straightforward procedure that can be used or adapted by researchers in other institutions for ongoing monitoring of alignment between course outcomes, teaching, and assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会科学专业学生数量素养课程中的一致性调查
开普敦大学的计算中心自1999年以来为社会科学学生开设了一学期的定量识字课程。这项研究的目的是提供一个例子,如何设计这样一个课程可以评估与定量推理目标的一致性。我们提出了课程学习成果的框架,并使用该框架来分析评估和学生的表现。我们发现,这门课程的总分数中,只有不到一半是用于定量信息的解释和交流(我们的“主要”成果),大约四分之一是用于计算的执行。分析显示,统计结果在整个课程分数的构成中代表性不足,对这些结果的评估几乎完全局限于两次期末考试。对结果和评估之间一致性的分析结果对于讨论课程设置的变化是有用的。对不同结果的学生表现的分析为改进我们的教学方法提供了有用的见解。分析展示了一个相对简单的程序,其他机构的研究人员可以使用或调整该程序,以持续监测课程成果、教学和评估之间的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Numeracy
Numeracy Mathematics-Mathematics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
DESKRIPSI KEMAMPUAN LITERASI MATEMATIKA MAHASISWA PGMI PEMBELAJARAN BERDEFERENSIASI BERBASIS PROBLEM POSING : SEBUAH KAJIAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS PEMBELAJARAN BERDEFERENSIASI BERBASIS PROBLEM POSING : SEBUAH KAJIAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS Infusing Quantitative Reasoning Skills into a Differential Equation Class in an Urban Public Community College Considering What Counts: Measuring Poverty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1