{"title":"Charles Bernstein: Avant-Garde Is a Constant Renewal","authors":"Ian Probstein","doi":"10.1215/01903659-9382271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The essay explores the work of Charles Bernstein in light of constant renewal. John Ashbery, as one of the brightest representatives of the New York School, and Charles Bernstein, as a representative of the language (L = A = N = G = U = A = G = E), have similar attitudes toward language. They have much in common in terms of poetics: in the rejection of loud phrases, prophetic statements, emotions, confessionalism, and certain self-centeredness. Poetry is a private matter for both. Both have poetics built on the “oddness that stays odd,” as Bernstein himself put it, paraphrasing Pound's “news that stays news.” Both are aimed at renovating the language, and the verses of both are built on fragmentation, collage, moving from one statement to another without preparation. However, in Ashbery, whose poems are surreal, these transitions are smoother, based on an apparent connection, what Bernstein calls “hypotaxis” or “associative parataxis.” In contrast, Bernstein's poetry is built on parataxis; it is “bumpy,” in the poet's own words.","PeriodicalId":46332,"journal":{"name":"Boundary 2-An International Journal of Literature and Culture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boundary 2-An International Journal of Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-9382271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The essay explores the work of Charles Bernstein in light of constant renewal. John Ashbery, as one of the brightest representatives of the New York School, and Charles Bernstein, as a representative of the language (L = A = N = G = U = A = G = E), have similar attitudes toward language. They have much in common in terms of poetics: in the rejection of loud phrases, prophetic statements, emotions, confessionalism, and certain self-centeredness. Poetry is a private matter for both. Both have poetics built on the “oddness that stays odd,” as Bernstein himself put it, paraphrasing Pound's “news that stays news.” Both are aimed at renovating the language, and the verses of both are built on fragmentation, collage, moving from one statement to another without preparation. However, in Ashbery, whose poems are surreal, these transitions are smoother, based on an apparent connection, what Bernstein calls “hypotaxis” or “associative parataxis.” In contrast, Bernstein's poetry is built on parataxis; it is “bumpy,” in the poet's own words.
本文从不断更新的角度探讨了查尔斯·伯恩斯坦的作品。约翰·阿什伯里是纽约学派最聪明的代表人物之一,查尔斯·伯恩斯坦是语言的代表人物(L = A. = N = G = U = A. = G = E) ,对语言有着相似的态度。他们在诗学方面有很多共同点:拒绝大声的短语、预言性的陈述、情感、忏悔主义和某种以自我为中心的观点。诗歌是双方的私事。正如伯恩斯坦自己所说,两者的诗学都建立在“保持奇怪的奇怪”之上,转述了庞德的“保持新闻的新闻”。两者都旨在更新语言,两者的诗歌都建立在碎片、拼贴的基础上,在没有准备的情况下从一种陈述转移到另一种陈述。然而,在阿什伯里,他的诗歌是超现实的,这些过渡是更平稳的,基于一种明显的联系,伯恩斯坦称之为“形合”或“联想意合”。相比之下,伯恩斯坦的诗歌是建立在意合之上的;用诗人自己的话说,这是“颠簸的”。
期刊介绍:
Extending beyond the postmodern, boundary 2, an international journal of literature and culture, approaches problems in these areas from a number of politically, historically, and theoretically informed perspectives. boundary 2 remains committed to understanding the present and approaching the study of national and international culture and politics through literature and the human sciences.