The Effect of Answering Pre-questions and Evaluating Confidence in Preparation on Learning in Classroom Instruction

Q4 Social Sciences Educational Practice & Theory Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.7459/ept/44.1.04
Keita Shinogaya
{"title":"The Effect of Answering Pre-questions and Evaluating Confidence in Preparation on Learning in Classroom Instruction","authors":"Keita Shinogaya","doi":"10.7459/ept/44.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined effective means of preparatory learning for upcoming classroom instructions. In a summer seminar on history, 76 junior high school students were assigned to three experimental groups: the answering pre-questions group, the rating confidence group, and the answering\n and rating confidence group. The results showed that answering pre-questions enabled students to integrate information in classroom lessons, while the rating confidence directed students’ attention to information in classroom lessons related to pre-questions. This study also revealed\n that, especially for students with low meaningful learning belief, rating confidence is effective. Suggestions for educational practices and future studies are discussed.","PeriodicalId":35223,"journal":{"name":"Educational Practice & Theory","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Practice & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7459/ept/44.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined effective means of preparatory learning for upcoming classroom instructions. In a summer seminar on history, 76 junior high school students were assigned to three experimental groups: the answering pre-questions group, the rating confidence group, and the answering and rating confidence group. The results showed that answering pre-questions enabled students to integrate information in classroom lessons, while the rating confidence directed students’ attention to information in classroom lessons related to pre-questions. This study also revealed that, especially for students with low meaningful learning belief, rating confidence is effective. Suggestions for educational practices and future studies are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
课堂教学中回答预先问题和评估准备信心对学习的影响
这项研究考察了为即将到来的课堂教学进行准备学习的有效方法。在一次夏季历史研讨会上,76名初中生被分配到三个实验组:回答预题组、评分信心组和回答和评分信心组。结果表明,回答预先提问使学生能够在课堂上整合信息,而评分置信度则引导学生关注课堂上与预先提问相关的信息。这项研究还表明,尤其是对于有意义学习信念较低的学生,评分信心是有效的。讨论了对教育实践和未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Practice & Theory
Educational Practice & Theory Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Educational Practice and Theory in its 40th year of publication continues as an important independent forum for original ideas in education research relevant to aspects of education including K-12 schools, education reforms, teaching methods and educational leadership. Educational Practice and Theory is: -a refereed journal with a distinguished panel of consulting editors; -comparative in focus; -innovative, path-finding and provocative; -diverse with reports on a wide range of countries and themes, and -applied and theoretical.
期刊最新文献
Teachers’ Beliefs About Grading, Grades, and Student Classroom Conduct Decision-Making Instruction: Rural Teachers’ Challenges and Perceptions of Robert Stahl’s Decision-Making Materials in the Social Studies Classroom Humor in Education: Exploring Its Complexities and Its Possibilities Notes and Comments Teachers as a Source of Support: Perceptions of Parents of Children With ADHD During COVID-19 Distance Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1