The effectiveness of the Conceptual Metaphor Approach to English idiom acquisition by young Chinese learners

Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI:10.1075/MSW.17024.PAN
M. Pan
{"title":"The effectiveness of the Conceptual Metaphor Approach to English idiom acquisition by young Chinese\n learners","authors":"M. Pan","doi":"10.1075/MSW.17024.PAN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Although the Conceptual Metaphor Approach (CMA) has been claimed to be effective with respect to English idiom\n acquisition for EFL/ESL learners at elementary level, the claim awaits further investigation with empirical evidence (Beréndi, Csábi, & Kövecses, 2008; Boers,\n 2004). How CMA benefits these learners’ idiom acquisition and in what way it can best be implemented in their\n classrooms remain unknown. This study addresses these issues and sheds light on the effectiveness of CMA through a\n quasi-experiment, in which metaphor is exploited as an intervention that explicitly introduces the connection between idioms and\n the underlying Conceptual Metaphor theme. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from 43 participants through\n questionnaires, tests and a semi-structured interview with the instructor. Results from an immediate post-test showed that\n participants under CMA scored higher than their counterparts who were undergoing a Memorizing Translation Approach, though the\n difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.08). A one-week delayed post-test found that CMA facilitated\n idiom acquisition at a statistically significant level (p < .05). Findings from participants’ drawings and the\n semi-structured interview showed that CMA had contributed to an engaging and active learning experience. Pedagogical implications\n of this study are discussed further.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/MSW.17024.PAN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Although the Conceptual Metaphor Approach (CMA) has been claimed to be effective with respect to English idiom acquisition for EFL/ESL learners at elementary level, the claim awaits further investigation with empirical evidence (Beréndi, Csábi, & Kövecses, 2008; Boers, 2004). How CMA benefits these learners’ idiom acquisition and in what way it can best be implemented in their classrooms remain unknown. This study addresses these issues and sheds light on the effectiveness of CMA through a quasi-experiment, in which metaphor is exploited as an intervention that explicitly introduces the connection between idioms and the underlying Conceptual Metaphor theme. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from 43 participants through questionnaires, tests and a semi-structured interview with the instructor. Results from an immediate post-test showed that participants under CMA scored higher than their counterparts who were undergoing a Memorizing Translation Approach, though the difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.08). A one-week delayed post-test found that CMA facilitated idiom acquisition at a statistically significant level (p < .05). Findings from participants’ drawings and the semi-structured interview showed that CMA had contributed to an engaging and active learning experience. Pedagogical implications of this study are discussed further.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
概念隐喻法对中国青年英语习语习得的影响
虽然概念隐喻法(CMA)被认为对初级阶段的EFL/ESL学习者的英语习语习得是有效的,但这一说法有待于进一步的实证研究(bersamendi, Csábi, & Kövecses, 2008;波尔人,2004年)。CMA如何有益于这些学习者的习语习得,以及在课堂上以何种方式实施成语习得最好,这些都是未知的。本研究通过一个准实验来解决这些问题,并揭示了CMA的有效性,在这个实验中,隐喻作为一种干预手段,明确地引入了习语与潜在的概念隐喻主题之间的联系。通过问卷调查、测试和与讲师的半结构化访谈,从43名参与者那里收集了定量和定性数据。即时后测结果显示,使用记忆翻译法的参与者得分高于使用记忆翻译法的参与者,尽管差异在统计学上不显著(p = 0.08)。延迟一周后测发现,CMA对习语习得有显著促进作用(p < .05)。参与者的图纸和半结构化访谈的结果表明,CMA为参与和积极的学习经验做出了贡献。本文进一步讨论了本研究的教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1