On the use of facio as support verb in late and Merovingian Latin

IF 0.2 0 CLASSICS Journal of Latin Linguistics Pub Date : 2018-11-30 DOI:10.1515/joll-2018-0011
G. Galdi
{"title":"On the use of facio as support verb in late and Merovingian Latin","authors":"G. Galdi","doi":"10.1515/joll-2018-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Support verb constructions are documented throughout the history of Latin as well as other (typologically also irrelated) languages. As shown in several studies, such constructions are characterized by the presence of a support verb exhibiting a more or less reduced semantic force, and a predicative (abstract or verbal) noun that often constitutes its direct object. The present contribution deals, specifically, with the use of facio as support verb (as in bellum facere, iter facere, insidias facere, etc.), focussing on the post-classical and late period. In particular, three questions shall be investigated: (i) whether, and if yes, how facio increases its popularity in later centuries both in non-Christian and Christian sources; (ii) how is the spread of use of facio-support verb constructions in the Mulomedicina Chironis and in the Itinerarium Egeriae to be accounted for; (iii) what type of semantic evolution does the verb undergo in later Latin and whether, in this respect, continuity or rupture should be assumed with regard to the archaic and classical periods. This last point will enable us to suggest a more convincing explanation for an often-quoted passage of Cicero (Phil. 3,22), in which the construction contumeliam facere occurs.","PeriodicalId":29862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Latin Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/joll-2018-0011","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Latin Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2018-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Support verb constructions are documented throughout the history of Latin as well as other (typologically also irrelated) languages. As shown in several studies, such constructions are characterized by the presence of a support verb exhibiting a more or less reduced semantic force, and a predicative (abstract or verbal) noun that often constitutes its direct object. The present contribution deals, specifically, with the use of facio as support verb (as in bellum facere, iter facere, insidias facere, etc.), focussing on the post-classical and late period. In particular, three questions shall be investigated: (i) whether, and if yes, how facio increases its popularity in later centuries both in non-Christian and Christian sources; (ii) how is the spread of use of facio-support verb constructions in the Mulomedicina Chironis and in the Itinerarium Egeriae to be accounted for; (iii) what type of semantic evolution does the verb undergo in later Latin and whether, in this respect, continuity or rupture should be assumed with regard to the archaic and classical periods. This last point will enable us to suggest a more convincing explanation for an often-quoted passage of Cicero (Phil. 3,22), in which the construction contumeliam facere occurs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论晚期和墨洛温拉丁语中facio作为支持动词的用法
摘要支持动词结构在拉丁语和其他(类型学上也不相关)语言的历史上都有记载。如几项研究所示,这类结构的特征是存在一个或多或少表现出语义减弱的支持动词,以及一个经常构成其直接宾语的表语(抽象或动词)名词。本贡献特别涉及facio作为支持动词的使用(如bellum facere、iter facere、insidias facere等),重点关注后古典主义和晚期。特别是,应调查三个问题:(i)facio在后来的几个世纪里是否以及如果是的话,如何在非基督教和基督教来源中增加其受欢迎程度;(ii)如何解释面部支持动词结构在Mulomedicina Chironis和Itinerarium Egeriae中的使用传播;(iii)在后来的拉丁语中,动词经历了什么类型的语义演变,在这方面,对于古代和古典时期,是否应该假设连续性或断裂性。最后一点将使我们能够为经常被引用的西塞罗(腓3,22)的一段话提出一个更令人信服的解释,在这段话中,结构contumeliam facere发生了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Future expressions in a sixth-century Latin translation of Josephus From deceit to pain: Late Latin dolus and the interplay between semantics and analogy Roman tablets as linguistic corpora: evidence for phonological variation in 2nd c. Latin Iterative or stative? New morphosemantic analyses of Latin lūgeō ‘mourn’ and doleō ‘feel pain’ Multiplication, addition, and subtraction in numerals: formal variation in Latin’s decads+ from an Indo-European perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1