South africa’s comorbidity: A chronic affliction of intersecting education, economic and health inequalities

IF 0.8 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education As Change Pub Date : 2021-05-11 DOI:10.25159/1947-9417/8677
S. Maistry
{"title":"South africa’s comorbidity: A chronic affliction of intersecting education, economic and health inequalities","authors":"S. Maistry","doi":"10.25159/1947-9417/8677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analogy of South Africa as an ailing “organism” afflicted by chronic socioeconomic inequality is apt as it captures the nation’s manifest endemic abrasions and frailties, especially as it relates to the lived experience of its most vulnerable citizens (the precariat). COVID-19 has accentuated the plight of the poor, yet political rhetoric professes that the pandemic does not discriminate. In this article I offer an analysis of the intricate relationship between politics, economics, and education in the South African context. I argue that these are indeed complexly connected social “phenomena” that have particular variant manifestations and implications for South African citizens. While I recognise that health is also implicated in this matrix, it is beyond the scope of this article to examine this crucial social provision in any detail. I contend that in attempting to understand how COVID-19 impacts South African society, it is important to firstly analyse the prevailing (pre-COVID) status quo, especially as it relates to socio-economic inequality, as the effects of the pandemic impact the lived experience of people on the indigent-affluent continuum in starkly distinct ways. The pandemic has brought into sharp purview the accentuated nature of human adversity in the South African context and the social justice peculiarities plaguing South African society. Methodologically, I attempt a Foucauldian analysis of the contemporary political-economy-education matrix to reveal how fundamental neoliberal tenets have fashioned South African society and its education system into a dualism in which poverty and affluence co-exist. I attempt to move beyond constructions of deprivation, strife and adversity to reflect on resistance and the resilience (technologies of the self) that human beings summon in the face of crisis. Secondly, I examine the impact of the pandemic at localised school level to reveal its material effects on poor schools. © The Author(s) 2021.","PeriodicalId":44983,"journal":{"name":"Education As Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education As Change","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/8677","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The analogy of South Africa as an ailing “organism” afflicted by chronic socioeconomic inequality is apt as it captures the nation’s manifest endemic abrasions and frailties, especially as it relates to the lived experience of its most vulnerable citizens (the precariat). COVID-19 has accentuated the plight of the poor, yet political rhetoric professes that the pandemic does not discriminate. In this article I offer an analysis of the intricate relationship between politics, economics, and education in the South African context. I argue that these are indeed complexly connected social “phenomena” that have particular variant manifestations and implications for South African citizens. While I recognise that health is also implicated in this matrix, it is beyond the scope of this article to examine this crucial social provision in any detail. I contend that in attempting to understand how COVID-19 impacts South African society, it is important to firstly analyse the prevailing (pre-COVID) status quo, especially as it relates to socio-economic inequality, as the effects of the pandemic impact the lived experience of people on the indigent-affluent continuum in starkly distinct ways. The pandemic has brought into sharp purview the accentuated nature of human adversity in the South African context and the social justice peculiarities plaguing South African society. Methodologically, I attempt a Foucauldian analysis of the contemporary political-economy-education matrix to reveal how fundamental neoliberal tenets have fashioned South African society and its education system into a dualism in which poverty and affluence co-exist. I attempt to move beyond constructions of deprivation, strife and adversity to reflect on resistance and the resilience (technologies of the self) that human beings summon in the face of crisis. Secondly, I examine the impact of the pandemic at localised school level to reveal its material effects on poor schools. © The Author(s) 2021.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非的共病:教育、经济和卫生不平等交织的慢性折磨
将南非比喻为一个受长期社会经济不平等折磨的病态“有机体”是恰当的,因为它反映了该国明显的地方性磨损和弱点,尤其是与最弱势公民(老年人)的生活经历有关。新冠肺炎加剧了穷人的困境,但政治言论声称,疫情没有歧视。在这篇文章中,我分析了南非背景下政治、经济和教育之间错综复杂的关系。我认为,这些确实是复杂联系的社会“现象”,对南非公民有着特殊的变体表现和影响。虽然我认识到健康也与这一矩阵有关,但对这一关键社会条款的任何细节研究都超出了本文的范围。我认为,在试图了解新冠肺炎对南非社会的影响时,首先分析当前(新冠肺炎之前)的现状,尤其是与社会经济不平等有关的现状,这一点很重要,因为疫情的影响以截然不同的方式影响着贫穷富裕阶层的生活体验。这场大流行病使南非背景下人类逆境的突出性质以及困扰南非社会的社会正义特点成为人们关注的焦点。在方法论上,我试图对当代政治经济教育矩阵进行傅式分析,以揭示新自由主义的基本原则是如何将南非社会及其教育体系塑造成贫困和富裕共存的二元论的。我试图超越匮乏、冲突和逆境的构建,反思人类在危机面前所表现出的抵抗力和韧性(自我技术)。其次,我在地方学校层面研究了疫情的影响,以揭示其对贫困学校的物质影响。©作者2021。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education As Change
Education As Change EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Education as Change is an accredited, peer reviewed scholarly online journal that publishes original articles reflecting critically on issues of equality in education and on the ways in which educational practices contribute to transformation in non-formal, formal and informal contexts. Critique, mainly understood in the tradition of critical pedagogies, is a constructive process which contributes towards a better world. Contributions from and about marginalised communities and from different knowledge traditions are encouraged. The articles could draw on any rigorous research methodology, as well as transdisciplinary approaches. Research of a very specialised or technical nature should be framed within relevant discourses. While specialised kinds of research are encouraged, authors are expected to write for a broader audience of educational researchers and practitioners without losing conceptual and theoretical depth and rigour. All sectors of education are covered in the journal. These include primary, secondary and tertiary education, adult education, worker education, educational policy and teacher education.
期刊最新文献
Vocational Education and Graduate Struggles in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: A Freirean Approach Unveiling the Employability Landscape: Chinese International Doctoral Students in Malaysian Universities Bibliometric Coloniality in South Africa: Critical Review of the Indexes of Accredited Journals Educide as Genocide in Palestine “Our Identity is Our Dignity”: Digital Transformations: Palestinian Aspirations, Idealism, Reality and Pragmatism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1