From Reconciliation to ‘Idle No More’: ‘Articulation’ and Indigenous Struggle in Canada

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Aboriginal Policy Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.5663/aps.v10i2.29412
M. Robertson
{"title":"From Reconciliation to ‘Idle No More’: ‘Articulation’ and Indigenous Struggle in Canada","authors":"M. Robertson","doi":"10.5663/aps.v10i2.29412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do different discourses lead to changes in understandings of the world, identity, meaning and practice in Indigenous politics in Canada? This article introduces the poststructuralist theory of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe to Canadian Indigenous studies and demonstrates that it is a unique and effective theory for understanding this question. It finds that in the last few decades, two principal discourses regarding Indigenous peoples and colonialism have circulated in the Canadian body politic—namely, (1) “reconciliation” and (2) “Idle No More.” These discourses shape the identities of both Indigenous peoples and settlers, construct understandings of the world, and determine the meaning of related political struggle, leading to real world practice and politics. The reconciliation discourse has at times been effective at becoming a dominant discourse and has often been able to constitute the meaning of important terms such as ‘decolonization.’ It serves to pacify Indigenous resistance to colonialism. Counter-hegemonic discourses on reconciliation such as ‘Idle No More’ have been able to challenge that discourse. Academic literature, newspaper articles, YouTube videos, podcasts developed by Indigenous scholars, public letters and speeches delivered by Canadian politicians are analyzed to examine the utterances and enunciations of the two discourses.","PeriodicalId":42043,"journal":{"name":"Aboriginal Policy Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aboriginal Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5663/aps.v10i2.29412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do different discourses lead to changes in understandings of the world, identity, meaning and practice in Indigenous politics in Canada? This article introduces the poststructuralist theory of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe to Canadian Indigenous studies and demonstrates that it is a unique and effective theory for understanding this question. It finds that in the last few decades, two principal discourses regarding Indigenous peoples and colonialism have circulated in the Canadian body politic—namely, (1) “reconciliation” and (2) “Idle No More.” These discourses shape the identities of both Indigenous peoples and settlers, construct understandings of the world, and determine the meaning of related political struggle, leading to real world practice and politics. The reconciliation discourse has at times been effective at becoming a dominant discourse and has often been able to constitute the meaning of important terms such as ‘decolonization.’ It serves to pacify Indigenous resistance to colonialism. Counter-hegemonic discourses on reconciliation such as ‘Idle No More’ have been able to challenge that discourse. Academic literature, newspaper articles, YouTube videos, podcasts developed by Indigenous scholars, public letters and speeches delivered by Canadian politicians are analyzed to examine the utterances and enunciations of the two discourses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从和解到“不再无所事事”:“表达”与加拿大的土著斗争
不同的话语如何导致加拿大原住民政治对世界、身份、意义和实践的理解发生变化?本文将Ernesto Laclau和Chantal Mouffe的后结构主义理论引入到加拿大土著研究中,证明它是理解这一问题的独特而有效的理论。研究发现,在过去的几十年里,关于土著民族和殖民主义的两种主要话语在加拿大政治体系中流传,即:(1)“和解”和(2)“不再无所事事”。这些话语塑造了土著人民和定居者的身份,构建了对世界的理解,并决定了相关政治斗争的意义,导致了现实世界的实践和政治。和解话语有时有效地成为主导话语,并经常能够构成诸如“非殖民化”等重要术语的含义。这是为了安抚原住民对殖民主义的反抗。关于和解的反霸权话语,如“不再无所事事”,已经能够挑战这种话语。本文分析了学术文献、报纸文章、YouTube视频、原住民学者制作的播客、加拿大政治家的公开信和演讲,以考察这两种话语的表达方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aboriginal Policy Studies
Aboriginal Policy Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Indigenous Identity Fraud: An Interview with Caroline Tait Analysis of Crime, Incarceration, Victimization and Employment of Indigenous Persons in Canada from 2015 to 2021 NAISA Council Statement on Indigenous Identity Fraud From Reconciliation to ‘Idle No More’: ‘Articulation’ and Indigenous Struggle in Canada Remaining Unreconciled: Philanthropy and Indigenous Governance in Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1