A culture of “pleasing”?

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Historical Pragmatics Pub Date : 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1075/jhp.00065.hel
G. Held
{"title":"A culture of “pleasing”?","authors":"G. Held","doi":"10.1075/jhp.00065.hel","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper seeks to explain the development of European politeness as a result of courtly behaviour where\n “complaisance” played an important role. As traces left in the so-called “language of politeness” of numerous European\n linguacultures show, mutual “pleasing” determined social performance in hierarchically organised societies by merging aesthetic\n concepts of form and order with ethical values of benevolence and charity. An analysis of the lexical item\n placere (‘to please’) in Early Modern Italian and French documents highlights the existence of six different\n formulaic usages, characterised by a high consistency in frequency, evolution and diffusion all over Europe. Appearing mainly in\n connection with interactive moves where will is at stake, placere-formulae represent co-operative means, which\n ease social relationships by conditioning and “embellishing” directives with different elements of social\n decorum. As acts of submission originating in the Medieval ars dictandi, they became integrated\n over time into the French dogma of “polished” conversation as an elitist “art de plaire” (Faret 1665). From France they spread into the European courts establishing a conception of politeness that has been\n underestimated in pragmatics so far.","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00065.hel","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper seeks to explain the development of European politeness as a result of courtly behaviour where “complaisance” played an important role. As traces left in the so-called “language of politeness” of numerous European linguacultures show, mutual “pleasing” determined social performance in hierarchically organised societies by merging aesthetic concepts of form and order with ethical values of benevolence and charity. An analysis of the lexical item placere (‘to please’) in Early Modern Italian and French documents highlights the existence of six different formulaic usages, characterised by a high consistency in frequency, evolution and diffusion all over Europe. Appearing mainly in connection with interactive moves where will is at stake, placere-formulae represent co-operative means, which ease social relationships by conditioning and “embellishing” directives with different elements of social decorum. As acts of submission originating in the Medieval ars dictandi, they became integrated over time into the French dogma of “polished” conversation as an elitist “art de plaire” (Faret 1665). From France they spread into the European courts establishing a conception of politeness that has been underestimated in pragmatics so far.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种“取悦”的文化?
本文试图解释欧洲礼貌的发展作为宫廷行为的结果,其中“顺从”发挥了重要作用。正如许多欧洲语言文化中所谓的“礼貌语言”所留下的痕迹所显示的那样,在等级制组织的社会中,通过将形式和秩序的美学概念与仁慈和慈善的伦理价值观相结合,相互“取悦”决定了社会表现。对早期现代意大利语和法语文献中词汇项placere(“取悦”)的分析强调了六种不同的套语用法的存在,其特点是频率、演变和在整个欧洲传播的高度一致性。placere-formulae主要出现在意志攸关的互动行动中,它代表合作手段,通过用不同的社会礼仪元素来调节和“修饰”指令,从而缓和社会关系。作为源自中世纪独裁的服从行为,随着时间的推移,它们被整合到法国“精致”谈话的教条中,成为一种精英主义的“艺术”(Faret 1665)。它们从法国传播到欧洲法院,建立了一种礼貌的概念,迄今为止在语用学中被低估了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.
期刊最新文献
Women’s voices in the public sphere Democratisation Colloquialisation A corpus-pragmatic analysis of linguistic democratisation in the British Hansard Speaking for the downtrodden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1