{"title":"Modal may in requests","authors":"Christine Elsweiler","doi":"10.1075/jhp.20013.els","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study applies House’s (1996, 2005) dimensions of cross-cultural differences as a diagnostic tool to investigate regional variation regarding two\n pragmalinguistic requestive patterns with may in Scottish and English non-private letters (1500 to 1700). The\n dimensional scheme proves a useful tool for explaining similarities and differences in the requestive behaviour in the two\n varieties. It is shown that, in the sixteenth century, grounders with may are part of a set of downgrading\n devices employed by letter-writers to counteract the directness and self-orientation particularly of performative requests in both\n the Scottish and the English correspondence. Moreover, the dimensional analysis explicates the cross-varietal differences\n regarding may in the seventeenth century correspondence by linking the rise of mitigating may in\n performative requests in the Scottish letters to the increased self-orientation towards the letter-writer, which is not\n counter-balanced by other downgraders.","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.20013.els","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study applies House’s (1996, 2005) dimensions of cross-cultural differences as a diagnostic tool to investigate regional variation regarding two
pragmalinguistic requestive patterns with may in Scottish and English non-private letters (1500 to 1700). The
dimensional scheme proves a useful tool for explaining similarities and differences in the requestive behaviour in the two
varieties. It is shown that, in the sixteenth century, grounders with may are part of a set of downgrading
devices employed by letter-writers to counteract the directness and self-orientation particularly of performative requests in both
the Scottish and the English correspondence. Moreover, the dimensional analysis explicates the cross-varietal differences
regarding may in the seventeenth century correspondence by linking the rise of mitigating may in
performative requests in the Scottish letters to the increased self-orientation towards the letter-writer, which is not
counter-balanced by other downgraders.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.