Incorporating student mobility in studying academic growth in math: comparing several alternative multilevel formulations

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH School Effectiveness and School Improvement Pub Date : 2022-04-17 DOI:10.1080/09243453.2022.2060265
R. Heck, Tingting Reid, G. Leckie
{"title":"Incorporating student mobility in studying academic growth in math: comparing several alternative multilevel formulations","authors":"R. Heck, Tingting Reid, G. Leckie","doi":"10.1080/09243453.2022.2060265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Increasing pupil mobility has led to widespread concern among parents, educators, and policymakers regarding its negative effects on academic performance. An important issue in examining mobility effects in longitudinal school achievement comparisons is providing accurate estimates. The presence of pupil mobility suggests that we should model pupils as belonging to the series of schools attended and not just their first or final school. We discuss several challenges in accounting for student mobility and, because of the presence of mobile pupils, how to represent the contribution of multiple schools attended on estimating academic growth properly. We then contrast several previous longitudinal multilevel models utilized with two cross-classified multiple membership (CCMM) models, which have been proposed to cumulate annual school effects on pupils’ academic growth better given the complexity of the multilevel data structure. We discuss our results in terms of their theoretical and practical implications for research on school academic improvement.","PeriodicalId":47698,"journal":{"name":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2022.2060265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Increasing pupil mobility has led to widespread concern among parents, educators, and policymakers regarding its negative effects on academic performance. An important issue in examining mobility effects in longitudinal school achievement comparisons is providing accurate estimates. The presence of pupil mobility suggests that we should model pupils as belonging to the series of schools attended and not just their first or final school. We discuss several challenges in accounting for student mobility and, because of the presence of mobile pupils, how to represent the contribution of multiple schools attended on estimating academic growth properly. We then contrast several previous longitudinal multilevel models utilized with two cross-classified multiple membership (CCMM) models, which have been proposed to cumulate annual school effects on pupils’ academic growth better given the complexity of the multilevel data structure. We discuss our results in terms of their theoretical and practical implications for research on school academic improvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合学生流动性研究数学的学术成长:比较几种不同的多层次公式
学生流动性的增加引起了家长、教育工作者和政策制定者对其对学习成绩的负面影响的广泛关注。在纵向学校成绩比较中检验流动性影响的一个重要问题是提供准确的估计。学生流动性的存在表明,我们应该把学生作为他们所就读的一系列学校的一部分,而不仅仅是他们的第一所或最后一所学校。我们讨论了考虑学生流动性的几个挑战,以及由于流动学生的存在,如何正确地表示多所学校在估计学术增长方面的贡献。然后,我们将之前使用的几个纵向多层模型与两个交叉分类多隶属度(CCMM)模型进行了对比,考虑到多层数据结构的复杂性,CCMM模型被提出来更好地累积学校对学生学业成长的年度影响。我们从理论和实践的角度来讨论我们的研究结果对学校学业进步的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
School Effectiveness and School Improvement EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: School Effectiveness and School Improvement presents information on educational effectiveness, practice and policy-making across primary, secondary and higher education. The Editors believe that the educational progress of all students, regardless of family background and economic status, is the key indicator of effectiveness and improvement in schools. The journal strives to explore this idea with manuscripts that cover a range of subjects within the area of educational effectiveness at the classroom, school or system level, including, but not limited to: •Effective pedagogy •Classroom climate •School ethos and leadership •School improvement and reform programmes •Systemwide policy and reform
期刊最新文献
Advancing the field of educational effectiveness and equity School leadership and students’ decisions about further education: exploring the roles of goal setting and school socioeconomic composition Against the odds: predictors of academic success and excellence in majority-minority schools Effects of the comprehensive school reform program Success for All on students’ reading skills in Dutch schools High-quality teachers in low-quality schools: understanding the variation in teaching quality in low-achieving Chilean schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1