Melodrama of Possessive Agency

Q3 Arts and Humanities Nordic Journal of Aesthetics Pub Date : 2022-10-10 DOI:10.7146/nja.v31i64.134222
Ragnhild Lome
{"title":"Melodrama of Possessive Agency","authors":"Ragnhild Lome","doi":"10.7146/nja.v31i64.134222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last decades, streams within posthumanism and new materialism, have turned their attention to the phenomenon of agency. And they have done so in ways which open the phenomenon for social and cultural historical investigations, relevant for cultural studies and literary studies alike. This article uses a concrete case—the melodramatic novel Koloss by Norwegian author Finn Alnæs—in order to speculate on how a literary form can be seen to co-evolve—or in this case, clash—with fluctuations in the cultural history of agency. In the 1960s—the heydays of cybernetics—a discrepancy can be observed, between the nourishment of individualism in politics and advertisement, and the distribution of individual agency in the new emerging technologies of cybernetics, which pushed agency as a question in the forefront of a series of novels, Koloss included. However, the novel’s discussion of agency was ignored by the critics, as well as in the scholarly literature to follow. In an effort to get closer to the co-development of ideas of agency and aesthetic form, the article asks why this has been the case. Did the melodramatic form of the novel stand in the way of its aesthetic reflection on agency? And could the novel and its reception therefore be seen as an example of the existence of complex feedback-loops, between ideas of agency in a given culture and aesthetic form?","PeriodicalId":38858,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Aesthetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Aesthetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/nja.v31i64.134222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last decades, streams within posthumanism and new materialism, have turned their attention to the phenomenon of agency. And they have done so in ways which open the phenomenon for social and cultural historical investigations, relevant for cultural studies and literary studies alike. This article uses a concrete case—the melodramatic novel Koloss by Norwegian author Finn Alnæs—in order to speculate on how a literary form can be seen to co-evolve—or in this case, clash—with fluctuations in the cultural history of agency. In the 1960s—the heydays of cybernetics—a discrepancy can be observed, between the nourishment of individualism in politics and advertisement, and the distribution of individual agency in the new emerging technologies of cybernetics, which pushed agency as a question in the forefront of a series of novels, Koloss included. However, the novel’s discussion of agency was ignored by the critics, as well as in the scholarly literature to follow. In an effort to get closer to the co-development of ideas of agency and aesthetic form, the article asks why this has been the case. Did the melodramatic form of the novel stand in the way of its aesthetic reflection on agency? And could the novel and its reception therefore be seen as an example of the existence of complex feedback-loops, between ideas of agency in a given culture and aesthetic form?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
占有欲的情节剧
在过去的几十年里,后人类主义和新唯物主义的主流已经把注意力转向了代理现象。他们这样做的方式为社会和文化历史调查打开了这一现象,与文化研究和文学研究都相关。本文以挪威作家Finn aln æs的情节剧小说《Koloss》为例,来推测一种文学形式是如何与代理文化历史的波动共同演变的,或者在这种情况下,是如何发生冲突的。在控制论的全盛时期——20世纪60年代,可以观察到一个差异,在政治和广告中个人主义的滋养与控制论新兴技术中个人代理的分布之间,这将代理作为一个问题推到了一系列小说的前沿,科洛斯包括在内。然而,小说中对代理的讨论却被评论界所忽视,在后来的学术文献中也是如此。为了更接近能动性和审美形式思想的共同发展,本文提出了为什么会出现这种情况的问题。小说的情节剧形式是否阻碍了它对代理的美学反思?因此,这部小说和它的接受是否可以被视为复杂反馈回路存在的一个例子,在特定文化和审美形式的代理思想之间?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Aesthetics
Nordic Journal of Aesthetics Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Your Tongue Here (Or Not): On Imagining Whether To Take a Bite (Or Not) Stay with Me: Uncertain Indices and Attentional Presence in Chat Interfaces Kant's "Aesthetic Idea": Towards an Aesthetics of Non-Attention Nothing to See? Paying Attention in the Dark Environment Attention, Affect, and Aesthetic Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1