Assessing German farmers’ trade-offs between disease resistance and yield in winter wheat varieties

IF 3.5 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Outlook on Agriculture Pub Date : 2022-11-25 DOI:10.1177/00307270221140572
K. Zander, Pascal Blaise, K. Holm-Müller
{"title":"Assessing German farmers’ trade-offs between disease resistance and yield in winter wheat varieties","authors":"K. Zander, Pascal Blaise, K. Holm-Müller","doi":"10.1177/00307270221140572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disease resistant crop varieties are important for both disease control and for reducing chemical pesticide use. However, there is often a trade-off between disease resistance and yield. While the European Union has banned the use of some pesticides in agriculture, large amounts are still applied to various crops, including wheat. Market-based instruments could motivate farmers to adopt more environmentally friendly production methods. In this study we aimed to explore farmers’ adoption of resistant varieties in different wheat price scenarios and their willingness to forgo yield when cultivating more resistant varieties. We conducted face-to-face interviews with 192 farmers using a choice experiment. Results showed that farmers preferred traits of yield stability (fungal disease resistance, lodging resistance and drought tolerance) over yield. Preferences for traits varied with the production system; livestock production was negatively associated with the importance of yield; cultivated land area was positively associated with protein content. The market price scenario did not change preferences. We calculate that farmers are willing to forgo more yield by cultivating highly disease resistant varieties than they are likely to recuperate from reducing costs of pesticides. Overall, we conclude that farmers’ choices are based more on a combination of the production system, drought experience, climate change belief and the potential impact of further regulations to reduce the use of chemical pesticides than on the expected wheat price.","PeriodicalId":54661,"journal":{"name":"Outlook on Agriculture","volume":"52 1","pages":"67 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Outlook on Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270221140572","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Disease resistant crop varieties are important for both disease control and for reducing chemical pesticide use. However, there is often a trade-off between disease resistance and yield. While the European Union has banned the use of some pesticides in agriculture, large amounts are still applied to various crops, including wheat. Market-based instruments could motivate farmers to adopt more environmentally friendly production methods. In this study we aimed to explore farmers’ adoption of resistant varieties in different wheat price scenarios and their willingness to forgo yield when cultivating more resistant varieties. We conducted face-to-face interviews with 192 farmers using a choice experiment. Results showed that farmers preferred traits of yield stability (fungal disease resistance, lodging resistance and drought tolerance) over yield. Preferences for traits varied with the production system; livestock production was negatively associated with the importance of yield; cultivated land area was positively associated with protein content. The market price scenario did not change preferences. We calculate that farmers are willing to forgo more yield by cultivating highly disease resistant varieties than they are likely to recuperate from reducing costs of pesticides. Overall, we conclude that farmers’ choices are based more on a combination of the production system, drought experience, climate change belief and the potential impact of further regulations to reduce the use of chemical pesticides than on the expected wheat price.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估德国农民在冬小麦品种的抗病性和产量之间的权衡
抗病作物品种对疾病控制和减少化学农药的使用都很重要。然而,在抗病性和产量之间往往存在权衡。虽然欧盟已经禁止在农业中使用某些农药,但仍有大量农药被用于包括小麦在内的各种作物。基于市场的工具可以激励农民采用更环保的生产方法。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨农民在不同小麦价格情景下对抗性品种的采用情况,以及他们在种植抗性更强的品种时放弃产量的意愿。我们通过选择实验对192名农民进行了面对面的访谈。结果表明,相对于产量,农民更看重产量稳定性(抗真菌病、抗倒伏和耐旱性)。对性状的偏好随生产系统的不同而不同;畜牧生产与产量的重要性呈负相关;耕地面积与蛋白质含量呈正相关。市场价格情景并没有改变偏好。我们计算出,农民愿意放弃更高的产量,种植高度抗病的品种,而不是从减少农药成本中恢复过来。总体而言,我们得出结论,农民的选择更多地是基于生产系统、干旱经验、气候变化信念以及进一步减少化学农药使用的法规的潜在影响的综合因素,而不是预期小麦价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Outlook on Agriculture
Outlook on Agriculture 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Outlook on Agriculture is a peer reviewed journal, published quarterly, which welcomes original research papers, research notes, invited reviews and commentary for an international and interdisciplinary readership. Special attention is paid to agricultural policy, international trade in the agricultural sector, strategic developments in food production, the links between agricultural systems and food security, the role of agriculture in social and economic development, agriculture in developing countries and environmental issues, including natural resources for agriculture and climate impacts.
期刊最新文献
Intellectual property rights and plants made by new genomic techniques: Access to technology and gene-edited traits in plant breeding Motivation and opportunity may drive Tunisian farmers to reduce chemical pesticides in horticulture Deciphering the crux of women's empowerment in agricultural value chains – A scoping review Gendered impacts of COVID-19 in agri-food system and recovery pathways in India: A systematic review Opinion leaders’ influence on knowledge transmission about crop diseases management: Exploring the attributes that matter to followers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1