{"title":"A performance evaluation and comparison model for Urban Public Healthcare Service Quality (UrbPubHCServQual) by Fuzzy TOPSIS Method","authors":"Rupal Khambhati, Hiren Patel, Satendra Kumar","doi":"10.1080/10495142.2020.1865232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We propose a conceptual performance evaluation and a comparison model to assess public-health-care-service quality in a fuzzy environment using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). First, it aims to explore and validate service-quality measurement constructs for public-health-care services using a Likert scale. Second, the study evaluates and compares service quality for three urban public-health-care facilities from Gujarat, India, using fuzzy linguistic analysis with consideration of feedback from health-care experts. We carried out a two-stage data collection process involving, first, development of a questionnaire and gathering of responses from patients and, second, an advance supplementary questionnaire and collection of feedback from health-care experts for in-patient services. Responses from patients were split into two random samples for Urban Public Healthcare Service Quality (UrbPubHCServQual) scale construction and validation. We derived a six-construct measurement model and used this to development the advanced supplementary questionnaire. The advance supplementary questionnaire was evaluated by 15 health-care experts to enable us to compare the performance of three urban public health-care facilities. The result indicated a six-construct measurement model for evaluating public-health-care-service quality. The measurement model was validated with respect to three aspects: first, the factor loadings of the two samples showed a similar pattern; second, the coefficient alpha analysis brought the same result for two samples; and third, the percentage of variance explained by various constructs was similar in two samples. Applying TOPSIS, the service quality of urban public-health-care facilities was compared and ranked on the basis of proximity to the ideal solution.","PeriodicalId":46735,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","volume":"34 1","pages":"291 - 310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10495142.2020.1865232","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2020.1865232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
ABSTRACT We propose a conceptual performance evaluation and a comparison model to assess public-health-care-service quality in a fuzzy environment using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). First, it aims to explore and validate service-quality measurement constructs for public-health-care services using a Likert scale. Second, the study evaluates and compares service quality for three urban public-health-care facilities from Gujarat, India, using fuzzy linguistic analysis with consideration of feedback from health-care experts. We carried out a two-stage data collection process involving, first, development of a questionnaire and gathering of responses from patients and, second, an advance supplementary questionnaire and collection of feedback from health-care experts for in-patient services. Responses from patients were split into two random samples for Urban Public Healthcare Service Quality (UrbPubHCServQual) scale construction and validation. We derived a six-construct measurement model and used this to development the advanced supplementary questionnaire. The advance supplementary questionnaire was evaluated by 15 health-care experts to enable us to compare the performance of three urban public health-care facilities. The result indicated a six-construct measurement model for evaluating public-health-care-service quality. The measurement model was validated with respect to three aspects: first, the factor loadings of the two samples showed a similar pattern; second, the coefficient alpha analysis brought the same result for two samples; and third, the percentage of variance explained by various constructs was similar in two samples. Applying TOPSIS, the service quality of urban public-health-care facilities was compared and ranked on the basis of proximity to the ideal solution.