Better Together: Combining Reading and Writing Instruction to Foster Informative Text Comprehension

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Literacy Research and Instruction Pub Date : 2020-04-27 DOI:10.1080/19388071.2020.1752861
C. Turcotte, Pier-Olivier Caron
{"title":"Better Together: Combining Reading and Writing Instruction to Foster Informative Text Comprehension","authors":"C. Turcotte, Pier-Olivier Caron","doi":"10.1080/19388071.2020.1752861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study conducted with French-speaking students living near Montréal, Canada, assess if teaching the shared knowledge between reading and writing of informative texts improves reading comprehension in fourth grade (9–10 years old) to a greater extent than teaching that separates reading and writing. Teachers participating in the experiment received teaching material and training during 1 year prior to data collection. The teaching approach involved three steps and included activities that were spread over 20 weeks and lasted approximately 2 h per week. Teachers from the non-experimental condition teach reading comprehension and writing strategies in a dissociated way. Students (n = 248) were tested with a reading comprehension assessment in September and May. Results show a significant interaction between time and groups, suggesting a moderate effect size. The experimental group started the experiment slightly behind in reading comprehension and ended up significantly better than the control group. Teaching how to articulate knowledge in reading and writing might favor reading comprehension of informative texts better than teaching strategies in a dissociated way. However, the introduction of such an approach required continuous training and robust teacher support.","PeriodicalId":45434,"journal":{"name":"Literacy Research and Instruction","volume":"59 1","pages":"240 - 259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388071.2020.1752861","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy Research and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2020.1752861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study conducted with French-speaking students living near Montréal, Canada, assess if teaching the shared knowledge between reading and writing of informative texts improves reading comprehension in fourth grade (9–10 years old) to a greater extent than teaching that separates reading and writing. Teachers participating in the experiment received teaching material and training during 1 year prior to data collection. The teaching approach involved three steps and included activities that were spread over 20 weeks and lasted approximately 2 h per week. Teachers from the non-experimental condition teach reading comprehension and writing strategies in a dissociated way. Students (n = 248) were tested with a reading comprehension assessment in September and May. Results show a significant interaction between time and groups, suggesting a moderate effect size. The experimental group started the experiment slightly behind in reading comprehension and ended up significantly better than the control group. Teaching how to articulate knowledge in reading and writing might favor reading comprehension of informative texts better than teaching strategies in a dissociated way. However, the introduction of such an approach required continuous training and robust teacher support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更好地在一起:阅读和写作教学相结合,培养信息性文本理解
摘要这项针对居住在加拿大蒙特利尔附近的法语学生的研究评估了在阅读和写作之间教授信息文本的共享知识是否比将阅读和写作分开的教学在更大程度上提高了四年级(9-10岁)的阅读理解。参与实验的教师在数据收集前一年接受了教材和培训。教学方法包括三个步骤,包括20周的活动,每周持续约2小时。非实验条件下的教师以分离的方式教授阅读理解和写作策略。学生(n=248)在9月和5月接受了阅读理解评估。结果显示,时间和群体之间存在显著的互动,表明影响大小适中。实验组在阅读理解方面开始时略有落后,最终明显优于对照组。教授如何在阅读和写作中表达知识可能比单独教授策略更有利于对信息文本的阅读理解。然而,采用这种方法需要持续的培训和强有力的教师支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Literacy Research and Instruction
Literacy Research and Instruction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Literacy Research and Instruction (formerly Reading Research and Instruction), the official journal of the College Reading Association, is an international refereed professional journal that publishes articles dealing with research and instruction in reading education and allied literacy fields. The journal is especially focused on instructional practices and applied or basic research of special interest to reading and literacy educators. Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by reviewers.
期刊最新文献
Empowering Adolescent Emergent Readers in Government Schools: An Exploration of Multimodal Texts as Pathways to Comprehension Novice Teachers’ Knowledge of Racial Literacies Effect of Dramatic Storytelling on Emergent Literacy in EFL: Evidence from the UAE Kindergartens Reexamining the Dolch Basic Sight Word List: Contemporary Considerations for Culturally Sustaining Approaches to Assess Sight Word Development A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Synchronous Paired Oral Reading Techniques in Elementary Classrooms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1