{"title":"Overconfidence Bias in Investment Decisions: A Systematic Mapping of Literature and Future Research Topics","authors":"J. Kumar, Neha Prince","doi":"10.1177/23197145231174344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study uses a systematic literature review to summarize and highlight studies on overconfidence bias in investment decision-making. More specifically, the study synthesizes the overconfidence literature highlighting the year of publication, country of the published articles, research methods, data sources, prominent theories, statistical techniques, citation analysis of the popular articles and authors and future research topics. The authors study 111 documents indexed in Scopus and/or Web of Science databases to recognize research trends regarding overconfidence bias during the last 29 years (1995–2023). The results indicate that most (61.26%) selected studies are empirical. Likewise, secondary data-based articles dominate primary ones. Additionally, the resulting factors can be classified into four themes: the construct of overconfidence bias and investments; success: a cause of overconfidence; gender and overconfidence; and the consequences of overconfidence. To the authors’ best knowledge, this is a unique article in which research outcomes of essential aspects of overconfidence are skimmed systematically.","PeriodicalId":53215,"journal":{"name":"FIIB Business Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FIIB Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145231174344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The current study uses a systematic literature review to summarize and highlight studies on overconfidence bias in investment decision-making. More specifically, the study synthesizes the overconfidence literature highlighting the year of publication, country of the published articles, research methods, data sources, prominent theories, statistical techniques, citation analysis of the popular articles and authors and future research topics. The authors study 111 documents indexed in Scopus and/or Web of Science databases to recognize research trends regarding overconfidence bias during the last 29 years (1995–2023). The results indicate that most (61.26%) selected studies are empirical. Likewise, secondary data-based articles dominate primary ones. Additionally, the resulting factors can be classified into four themes: the construct of overconfidence bias and investments; success: a cause of overconfidence; gender and overconfidence; and the consequences of overconfidence. To the authors’ best knowledge, this is a unique article in which research outcomes of essential aspects of overconfidence are skimmed systematically.
本研究使用系统的文献综述来总结和强调投资决策中过度自信偏见的研究。更具体地说,该研究综合了过度自信文献,突出了发表年份、发表文章的国家、研究方法、数据来源、突出的理论、统计技术、流行文章和作者的引用分析以及未来的研究主题。作者研究了Scopus和/或Web of Science数据库中索引的111篇文献,以识别过去29年(1995-2023)中关于过度自信偏见的研究趋势。结果表明,大多数(61.26%)选择的研究是实证研究。同样,次要的基于数据的文章在主要文章中占主导地位。此外,由此产生的因素可以分为四个主题:过度自信偏见和投资的构建;成功:过度自信的原因;性别和过度自信;以及过度自信的后果。据作者所知,这是一篇独特的文章,系统地梳理了过度自信的基本方面的研究成果。