Overconfidence Bias in Investment Decisions: A Systematic Mapping of Literature and Future Research Topics

IF 2.5 Q3 BUSINESS FIIB Business Review Pub Date : 2023-07-17 DOI:10.1177/23197145231174344
J. Kumar, Neha Prince
{"title":"Overconfidence Bias in Investment Decisions: A Systematic Mapping of Literature and Future Research Topics","authors":"J. Kumar, Neha Prince","doi":"10.1177/23197145231174344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study uses a systematic literature review to summarize and highlight studies on overconfidence bias in investment decision-making. More specifically, the study synthesizes the overconfidence literature highlighting the year of publication, country of the published articles, research methods, data sources, prominent theories, statistical techniques, citation analysis of the popular articles and authors and future research topics. The authors study 111 documents indexed in Scopus and/or Web of Science databases to recognize research trends regarding overconfidence bias during the last 29 years (1995–2023). The results indicate that most (61.26%) selected studies are empirical. Likewise, secondary data-based articles dominate primary ones. Additionally, the resulting factors can be classified into four themes: the construct of overconfidence bias and investments; success: a cause of overconfidence; gender and overconfidence; and the consequences of overconfidence. To the authors’ best knowledge, this is a unique article in which research outcomes of essential aspects of overconfidence are skimmed systematically.","PeriodicalId":53215,"journal":{"name":"FIIB Business Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FIIB Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145231174344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The current study uses a systematic literature review to summarize and highlight studies on overconfidence bias in investment decision-making. More specifically, the study synthesizes the overconfidence literature highlighting the year of publication, country of the published articles, research methods, data sources, prominent theories, statistical techniques, citation analysis of the popular articles and authors and future research topics. The authors study 111 documents indexed in Scopus and/or Web of Science databases to recognize research trends regarding overconfidence bias during the last 29 years (1995–2023). The results indicate that most (61.26%) selected studies are empirical. Likewise, secondary data-based articles dominate primary ones. Additionally, the resulting factors can be classified into four themes: the construct of overconfidence bias and investments; success: a cause of overconfidence; gender and overconfidence; and the consequences of overconfidence. To the authors’ best knowledge, this is a unique article in which research outcomes of essential aspects of overconfidence are skimmed systematically.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投资决策中的过度自信偏差:文献和未来研究课题的系统映射
本研究使用系统的文献综述来总结和强调投资决策中过度自信偏见的研究。更具体地说,该研究综合了过度自信文献,突出了发表年份、发表文章的国家、研究方法、数据来源、突出的理论、统计技术、流行文章和作者的引用分析以及未来的研究主题。作者研究了Scopus和/或Web of Science数据库中索引的111篇文献,以识别过去29年(1995-2023)中关于过度自信偏见的研究趋势。结果表明,大多数(61.26%)选择的研究是实证研究。同样,次要的基于数据的文章在主要文章中占主导地位。此外,由此产生的因素可以分为四个主题:过度自信偏见和投资的构建;成功:过度自信的原因;性别和过度自信;以及过度自信的后果。据作者所知,这是一篇独特的文章,系统地梳理了过度自信的基本方面的研究成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
11.50%
发文量
68
期刊最新文献
Demystifying Organization Success: A Bibliometric Analysis and Future Research Agenda What Influences Innovation Score for Countries at Different Levels of Development? Examining the Effects of Teaching, Research and Knowledge Transfer Three Decades of Life Satisfaction: A Bibliometric Review and Research Agenda Workplace Stressors and Their Consequences on Frontliners’ Performance: A Conservation of Resources Perspective A Semiotic Analysis of Cultural Differences Between Australian and Emirati E-commerce Websites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1