Optimizing fertigation of eggplant production in hydroponic coco-peat substrate

E. Tabet, Reda A. Awali, Dalida Darazi, C. Hosri
{"title":"Optimizing fertigation of eggplant production in hydroponic coco-peat substrate","authors":"E. Tabet, Reda A. Awali, Dalida Darazi, C. Hosri","doi":"10.22453/LSJ-021.2.129-145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims at optimizing eggplant cultivation by comparing hydroponic fertigation recipes in coco-peat substrate with traditional soil cultivation. The first two groups of 36 plants each are fertilized according to the recipes recommended by two companies (A and B), treatments 1 and 2 respectively. The third is fertilized according to the conventional method in the soil adopted by farmers (group C). Company A applies standard fertilizer application protocol throughout the life of the plant with a stable pH and electro conductivity of 6 and 2.8 mS / cm respectively. Company B applies an upward fertilizer scheme during the plant's production cycle with a stable pH of 5.6, but an electro conductivity that varies from 2.1 mS / cm at the vegetative phase to 2.5 mS / cm from the appearance of the 1st fruit. Despite its high investment, the two hydroponic treatments T1 and T2 showed greater plant size (127 cm and 129 cm respectively at the 12th week), more fruits (15 fruits per plant each week, compared to 8 fruits per plant in the soil), and higher yield (average mass per plant reached a maximum value at the 11th week of 1.192 g for T1 and 1,189 g for T2 compared to 499 g for the soil). The difference in revenues shows a negligible financial advantage in favor of Company B. Adopting fertilization recipe of Company A or B is not a limiting factor at the financial level hence either one of the two formulations is adequate.","PeriodicalId":31081,"journal":{"name":"Lebanese Science Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lebanese Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22453/LSJ-021.2.129-145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims at optimizing eggplant cultivation by comparing hydroponic fertigation recipes in coco-peat substrate with traditional soil cultivation. The first two groups of 36 plants each are fertilized according to the recipes recommended by two companies (A and B), treatments 1 and 2 respectively. The third is fertilized according to the conventional method in the soil adopted by farmers (group C). Company A applies standard fertilizer application protocol throughout the life of the plant with a stable pH and electro conductivity of 6 and 2.8 mS / cm respectively. Company B applies an upward fertilizer scheme during the plant's production cycle with a stable pH of 5.6, but an electro conductivity that varies from 2.1 mS / cm at the vegetative phase to 2.5 mS / cm from the appearance of the 1st fruit. Despite its high investment, the two hydroponic treatments T1 and T2 showed greater plant size (127 cm and 129 cm respectively at the 12th week), more fruits (15 fruits per plant each week, compared to 8 fruits per plant in the soil), and higher yield (average mass per plant reached a maximum value at the 11th week of 1.192 g for T1 and 1,189 g for T2 compared to 499 g for the soil). The difference in revenues shows a negligible financial advantage in favor of Company B. Adopting fertilization recipe of Company A or B is not a limiting factor at the financial level hence either one of the two formulations is adequate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水培椰子泥炭基质中茄子生产的优化施肥
本研究旨在通过比较椰子泥炭基质和传统土壤栽培的水培灌溉施肥配方来优化茄子的栽培。前两组36株植物分别按照两家公司(A和B)推荐的配方施肥,处理1和2。第三种是根据农民采用的传统方法在土壤中施肥(C组)。公司A在植物的整个生命周期中采用标准施肥方案,稳定的pH值和电导率分别为6和2.8mS/cm。公司B在植物的生产周期中采用向上施肥方案,pH稳定在5.6,但电导率从营养期的2.1 mS/cm到第1个果实出现时的2.5 mS/cm不等。尽管投资高,但两个水培处理T1和T2表现出更大的植株大小(第12周分别为127厘米和129厘米)、更多的果实(每株植物每周15个果实,而土壤中每株植物有8个果实)和更高的产量(第11周每株植物的平均质量达到最大值,T1为1.192克,T2为1189克,而土壤为499克)。收入的差异表明,对B公司有利的财务优势可以忽略不计。在财务层面上,采用a公司或B公司的施肥配方不是限制因素,因此这两种配方中的任何一种都足够。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Insecticidal Activity on Callosobruchus Maculatus of Essential Oils Extracted from Naturally Grown and Cultivated Rosemary Lebanese Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare Industry: Investing in the Pharmaceutical Industry to Promote Exports Preliminary Study on Food Loss Analysis in the Apple Value Chain: The Case of Kesrwan-Mount Lebanon Lifestyle Patterns of Patients with Alopecia and Factors Affecting their Willingness to Undergo Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Adults The Caseous lymphadenitis Increases the Vulnerability of the Sheep Herders in Algeria (Case of the Ziban-East Province)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1