The PROMoting the USE of SWATs (PROMETHEUS) programme: Lessons learnt and future developments for SWATs

Laura Clark, C. Arundel, Elizabeth Coleman, Laura Doherty, Adwoa Parker, C. Hewitt, David J Beard, P. Bower, P. Brocklehurst, Cindy L. Cooper, L. Culliford, D. Devane, R. Emsley, S. Eldridge, Sandra Galvin, K. Gillies, A. Montgomery, C. Sutton, S. Treweek, D. Torgerson
{"title":"The PROMoting the USE of SWATs (PROMETHEUS) programme: Lessons learnt and future developments for SWATs","authors":"Laura Clark, C. Arundel, Elizabeth Coleman, Laura Doherty, Adwoa Parker, C. Hewitt, David J Beard, P. Bower, P. Brocklehurst, Cindy L. Cooper, L. Culliford, D. Devane, R. Emsley, S. Eldridge, Sandra Galvin, K. Gillies, A. Montgomery, C. Sutton, S. Treweek, D. Torgerson","doi":"10.1177/26320843221089632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The PROMETHEUS programme (PROMoting THE USE of SWATs) was funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) infrastructure funding from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The purpose was to develop strategies to increase the recruitment and retention evidence base. This paper aims to present observations from this work. Observations The PROMETHUS programme funded 42 SWATs, the average cost of each SWAT was £4007. A central coordination point enabled a concentrated effort in SWAT research activity leading to a rapid increase in the evidence base. The methodological feasibility of undertaking a coordinated SWAT design was established. The international Trial Forge SWAT Network was developed in 2021 to connect research groups in response for the need to connect teams undertaking methodological research. A SWAT reporting template and a database of researchers willing to peer review SWATs are also needed to improve the reporting of SWATs. Discussion There is a need to develop a strategy to aid teams to identify a suitable SWAT for their host trial populations and a mechanism to communicate SWAT research priorities. Work is needed to increase the awareness of the methodological importance of SWAT research with research teams and develop engagement strategies to increase SWAT activity. Continued collaboration with the HRA is necessary to refine the SWAT approvals process. Conclusion The coordination PROMETHEUS provided is crucial to increasing the recruitment retention evidence base. The Trial Forge Network will be key to provide ongoing networking and dissemination opportunities.","PeriodicalId":74683,"journal":{"name":"Research methods in medicine & health sciences","volume":"3 1","pages":"100 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research methods in medicine & health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26320843221089632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Introduction The PROMETHEUS programme (PROMoting THE USE of SWATs) was funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) infrastructure funding from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The purpose was to develop strategies to increase the recruitment and retention evidence base. This paper aims to present observations from this work. Observations The PROMETHUS programme funded 42 SWATs, the average cost of each SWAT was £4007. A central coordination point enabled a concentrated effort in SWAT research activity leading to a rapid increase in the evidence base. The methodological feasibility of undertaking a coordinated SWAT design was established. The international Trial Forge SWAT Network was developed in 2021 to connect research groups in response for the need to connect teams undertaking methodological research. A SWAT reporting template and a database of researchers willing to peer review SWATs are also needed to improve the reporting of SWATs. Discussion There is a need to develop a strategy to aid teams to identify a suitable SWAT for their host trial populations and a mechanism to communicate SWAT research priorities. Work is needed to increase the awareness of the methodological importance of SWAT research with research teams and develop engagement strategies to increase SWAT activity. Continued collaboration with the HRA is necessary to refine the SWAT approvals process. Conclusion The coordination PROMETHEUS provided is crucial to increasing the recruitment retention evidence base. The Trial Forge Network will be key to provide ongoing networking and dissemination opportunities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进使用全部门办法方案:全部门办法的经验教训和未来发展
引言PROMETHEUS计划(促进SWAT的使用)由英国医学研究委员会(MRC)和国家卫生研究所(NIHR)的临床试验单位(CTU)基础设施资助。其目的是制定战略,以增加征聘和留用的证据基础。本文旨在介绍这项工作的观察结果。观察PROMETHUS计划资助了42个特警队,每个特警队的平均费用为4007英镑。一个中央协调点使特警队的研究活动能够集中精力,从而迅速增加了证据基础。确定了进行特警队协调设计的方法可行性。国际Trial Forge SWAT网络于2021年开发,旨在连接研究小组,以应对连接进行方法研究的团队的需求。还需要一个SWAT报告模板和一个愿意对SWAT进行同行评审的研究人员数据库,以改进SWAT的报告。讨论有必要制定一项战略,帮助团队为其宿主试验人群确定合适的特警队,并建立一种沟通特警队研究优先事项的机制。需要开展工作,与研究团队一起提高对特警队研究方法重要性的认识,并制定参与战略,以增加特警队的活动。有必要继续与HRA合作,以完善SWAT审批流程。结论所提供的协调性PROMETHEUS对增加招募保留证据库至关重要。Trial Forge网络将是提供持续联网和传播机会的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Choice of Link Functions for Generalized Linear Mixed Models in Meta-Analyses of Proportions. Disclosure of suicidal ideation in non-psychiatric clinical research: Experience using a novel suicide risk management algorithm in a multi-center smoking cessation trial Dynamic relationship among immediate release fentanyl use and cancer incidence: A multivariate time-series analysis using vector autoregressive models Monitoring metrics over time: Why clinical trialists need to systematically collect site performance metrics. Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1