Automation Tool for Institutional Repositories Evaluation

Juan Sebastián González-Sanabria, Fabián-Nicolás Ramos-Corredor, Germán Amezquita-Becerra
{"title":"Automation Tool for Institutional Repositories Evaluation","authors":"Juan Sebastián González-Sanabria, Fabián-Nicolás Ramos-Corredor, Germán Amezquita-Becerra","doi":"10.19053/01211129.v31.n61.2022.14724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of digital repositories has framed a significant advance in access to academic and scientific knowledge, increasing its impact due to greater reach and lower cost. However, these platforms are a new topic that initially did not have standards or models to carry out their implementation and operation, which is why there were inconsistencies between repositories on issues such as interoperability, digital preservation, among others. Due to the lack of standardization and the exponential increase in the number of repositories, different organizations and researchers made multiple proposals to standardize the processes and characteristics of these platforms. The proposals materialized in models, such as the Dublin Core and DataCite metadata schemes, and in guides for the evaluation and implementation of repositories, such as the \"Guide for the evaluation of institutional research repositories\" by RECOLECTA or the DINI certificate (Deutsche Initiative für Netzwerk Information). The latter aim to evaluate the platforms in their entirety, including 8 sections with a total of 87 elements. Therefore, in this research an application was developed to automate the evaluation of repositories, automating processes that improve educational work using computer tools and their integration.","PeriodicalId":42846,"journal":{"name":"Revista Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad Pedagogica y Tecnologica de Colombia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad Pedagogica y Tecnologica de Colombia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v31.n61.2022.14724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise of digital repositories has framed a significant advance in access to academic and scientific knowledge, increasing its impact due to greater reach and lower cost. However, these platforms are a new topic that initially did not have standards or models to carry out their implementation and operation, which is why there were inconsistencies between repositories on issues such as interoperability, digital preservation, among others. Due to the lack of standardization and the exponential increase in the number of repositories, different organizations and researchers made multiple proposals to standardize the processes and characteristics of these platforms. The proposals materialized in models, such as the Dublin Core and DataCite metadata schemes, and in guides for the evaluation and implementation of repositories, such as the "Guide for the evaluation of institutional research repositories" by RECOLECTA or the DINI certificate (Deutsche Initiative für Netzwerk Information). The latter aim to evaluate the platforms in their entirety, including 8 sections with a total of 87 elements. Therefore, in this research an application was developed to automate the evaluation of repositories, automating processes that improve educational work using computer tools and their integration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机构知识库评估自动化工具
数字资源库的兴起使学术和科学知识的获取取得了重大进展,由于覆盖范围更广、成本更低,其影响也更大。然而,这些平台是一个新的主题,最初没有标准或模型来执行它们的实现和操作,这就是为什么存储库之间在诸如互操作性、数字保存等问题上存在不一致。由于缺乏标准化和存储库数量的指数级增长,不同的组织和研究人员提出了多种标准化这些平台的过程和特征的建议。这些建议体现在模型中,如都柏林核心和DataCite元数据方案,以及存储库评估和实施指南中,如RECOLECTA或DINI证书(Deutsche Initiative fr Netzwerk Information)的“机构研究存储库评估指南”。后者旨在对平台进行整体评估,包括8个部分,共87个要素。因此,在本研究中,开发了一个应用程序来自动化存储库的评估,自动化使用计算机工具及其集成来改进教育工作的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Potenciación de la escritura a través de la creatividad Tecnología y educación superior: visión desde la estética enfilada el mejoramiento humano Estrés en niños de quinto de primaria: Propuesta de talleres interactivos El Google Drive para potenciar la escritura de los textos argumentativos Heat flow modeling in the alkaline activation process of fly ash
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1