Understanding the Interplay of Psychosocial Competencies in Talent Development: Typologies and Differences for Gifted Students

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education Pub Date : 2022-06-27 DOI:10.1080/02783193.2022.2071368
Emily L. Mofield, Megan Parker Peters
{"title":"Understanding the Interplay of Psychosocial Competencies in Talent Development: Typologies and Differences for Gifted Students","authors":"Emily L. Mofield, Megan Parker Peters","doi":"10.1080/02783193.2022.2071368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The study examined the relationship between implicit theories of intelligence and psychosocial competencies (measured as adaptability, general mood, intrapersonal skills, interpersonal skills, and stress management), the differences in these competencies between gifted students and nonidentified gifted students, and typologies of these variables among 81 gifted students in grades 6–8. Findings indicated that malleable beliefs about intelligence were related to adaptability, general mood, and to a small degree total emotional intelligence. Gifted students had higher scores on adaptability (d = .51) compared to a normative sample and lower scores on intrapersonal skills (d = −.30). Hierarchical cluster and discriminant function analyses yielded three distinct clusters indicating within-group differences, with Cluster 1 showing lowest scores on all measured scales. Findings imply how the interplay of psychosocial variables facilitates talent development.","PeriodicalId":46979,"journal":{"name":"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"144 - 156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2022.2071368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The study examined the relationship between implicit theories of intelligence and psychosocial competencies (measured as adaptability, general mood, intrapersonal skills, interpersonal skills, and stress management), the differences in these competencies between gifted students and nonidentified gifted students, and typologies of these variables among 81 gifted students in grades 6–8. Findings indicated that malleable beliefs about intelligence were related to adaptability, general mood, and to a small degree total emotional intelligence. Gifted students had higher scores on adaptability (d = .51) compared to a normative sample and lower scores on intrapersonal skills (d = −.30). Hierarchical cluster and discriminant function analyses yielded three distinct clusters indicating within-group differences, with Cluster 1 showing lowest scores on all measured scales. Findings imply how the interplay of psychosocial variables facilitates talent development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解社会心理能力在人才发展中的相互作用:资优学生的类型和差异
摘要本研究考察了智力的内隐理论与心理社会能力(以适应性、一般情绪、人际技能、人际关系技能和压力管理为衡量标准)之间的关系,天才学生和未被识别的天才学生在这些能力方面的差异,以及81名6-8年级天才学生的这些变量的类型。研究结果表明,关于智力的可塑性信念与适应性、总体情绪以及在一定程度上的总情商有关。与标准样本相比,天赋异禀的学生在适应性方面得分更高(d=.51),在人际技能方面得分更低(d=−.30)。分层聚类和判别函数分析产生了三个不同的聚类,表明了组内差异,其中聚类1在所有测量量表上的得分最低。研究结果暗示了心理社会变量的相互作用如何促进人才发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
The Life and Work of Marcia Gentry: Providing Opportunities and Promoting Excellence Marcia Gentry: Early Research Passions and Subsequent Important Contributions to Equity and Diverse Students Marcia Gentry as Influencer: Leader, Scholar, Colleague, Friend Memories and Musings: My Experiences with Marcia Gentry and More Inspiring the Future: An Interview with Kenneth Kiewra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1