A. Murawska, Jarosław M. Fraś, Ewa Frąckowiak, A. Rybicki
{"title":"PROFESSION OF A ‘MUSEUM CURATOR’.\nON LEGAL CHANGES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE\nEROSION OF THE ROLE PLAYED BY MUSEUM\nCURATORS","authors":"A. Murawska, Jarosław M. Fraś, Ewa Frąckowiak, A. Rybicki","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0014.3323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Changes in the legislation related to museum\ncurators and museology, introduced with small steps in\nharmony with the Overton Window concept, are discussed;\nthey are leading away from the letter and spirit of the Act\non Museums of 21 Nov 1996 and the traditions of Polish\nmuseology based on creating collections of museum objects\nand working on them in various manners. Regulations\nand legal opinions on the museum curator profession are\npresented, pointing to the fact that the initially cohesive\ndefinitions and provisions are becoming blurred, to the extent\nof losing their initial sense, and threatening the identity of\nthis professional group, as well as the identity of museums\nas heritage-preserving organizations. Furthermore, attempts\nto extend the concept of museum curator to encompass\nalso the institution’s executives or the entire museum staff\nundertaken in order to depreciate this professional group\nand deprive it of the impact on the institution’s management\nhave been signalled. A tendency has been observed to\ndeprive the employees fulfilling the museum’s basic activity,\nmuseum curators included, of the influence on shaping state\npolicies with respect to museology, this clearly illustrated by\nthe composition of the Council for Museums and National Memorial Sites. Provisions of the labour legislation as regards\nprofessions of public trust museum curators aspire to join\nhave been quoted. Mention has also been made of certain\nactivities they have undertaken to prevent the process of\nde-professionalising the profession of a museum curator\nin the museum-related legislation, and to subsequently\nreverse it. The 2016 Bill on Museum Collections and on\nMuseums prepared by the National Section for Museums\nand Institutions for the Preservation of Historical Monuments\nof the Solidarity Trade Union has been presented. The main\ndemands of the Bill have been pointed to: the consolidation\nof the status of museum collections as the main purpose of\nthe museum’s raison d’être, the status of a museum curator\nas a profession of public trust, and the shift in museum\nmanagement from technocratic (New Public Management)\nto modern, aiming to serve the national heritage and people\nin harmony with the principles of the New Public Service.\n\n","PeriodicalId":36577,"journal":{"name":"Muzealnictwo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muzealnictwo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.3323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Changes in the legislation related to museum
curators and museology, introduced with small steps in
harmony with the Overton Window concept, are discussed;
they are leading away from the letter and spirit of the Act
on Museums of 21 Nov 1996 and the traditions of Polish
museology based on creating collections of museum objects
and working on them in various manners. Regulations
and legal opinions on the museum curator profession are
presented, pointing to the fact that the initially cohesive
definitions and provisions are becoming blurred, to the extent
of losing their initial sense, and threatening the identity of
this professional group, as well as the identity of museums
as heritage-preserving organizations. Furthermore, attempts
to extend the concept of museum curator to encompass
also the institution’s executives or the entire museum staff
undertaken in order to depreciate this professional group
and deprive it of the impact on the institution’s management
have been signalled. A tendency has been observed to
deprive the employees fulfilling the museum’s basic activity,
museum curators included, of the influence on shaping state
policies with respect to museology, this clearly illustrated by
the composition of the Council for Museums and National Memorial Sites. Provisions of the labour legislation as regards
professions of public trust museum curators aspire to join
have been quoted. Mention has also been made of certain
activities they have undertaken to prevent the process of
de-professionalising the profession of a museum curator
in the museum-related legislation, and to subsequently
reverse it. The 2016 Bill on Museum Collections and on
Museums prepared by the National Section for Museums
and Institutions for the Preservation of Historical Monuments
of the Solidarity Trade Union has been presented. The main
demands of the Bill have been pointed to: the consolidation
of the status of museum collections as the main purpose of
the museum’s raison d’être, the status of a museum curator
as a profession of public trust, and the shift in museum
management from technocratic (New Public Management)
to modern, aiming to serve the national heritage and people
in harmony with the principles of the New Public Service.