The Critique of Sufism in Ahmad Amin’s Social Theory

Abdul Kadir Riyadi, Moh. Isom Mudin
{"title":"The Critique of Sufism in Ahmad Amin’s Social Theory","authors":"Abdul Kadir Riyadi, Moh. Isom Mudin","doi":"10.21111/tsaqafah.v16i2.5079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ahmad Amin is renown for his reformist ideas. His thought covers a wide range of issues. Nonetheless, little has been done to study his perspective on Sufism. This paper is aimed at filling that gap. As a historian, sociologist and philosopher, Amin has many to offer concerning how Sufism should be treated. The paper argues that like many reformists, Amin is reluctant to accept certain –notably philosophical- aspects of Sufism and regard them as baseless, useless and ahistorical. These should be abandoned as they serve nothing for the Muslim community. His intellectual project is designed to dirent Sufism as a moral –that is Ghazalian- system. But he at the same time also proposes –like Ibn Khaldun- that Sufism should be treated as a means of realising commong good ( maslahah ) instead of acquiring personal sanctity (karamah). Hence, his critique of Sufism is based on the synthesis between Ghazalian form of paradigm with that of Khaldunian system of thought. While Amin has not paid enough attention to Sufism in his studies, deeper look at his world-view reveals that his interest to this spiritual dimension of Islam is unrivalled","PeriodicalId":53315,"journal":{"name":"Tsaqafah","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tsaqafah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v16i2.5079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Ahmad Amin is renown for his reformist ideas. His thought covers a wide range of issues. Nonetheless, little has been done to study his perspective on Sufism. This paper is aimed at filling that gap. As a historian, sociologist and philosopher, Amin has many to offer concerning how Sufism should be treated. The paper argues that like many reformists, Amin is reluctant to accept certain –notably philosophical- aspects of Sufism and regard them as baseless, useless and ahistorical. These should be abandoned as they serve nothing for the Muslim community. His intellectual project is designed to dirent Sufism as a moral –that is Ghazalian- system. But he at the same time also proposes –like Ibn Khaldun- that Sufism should be treated as a means of realising commong good ( maslahah ) instead of acquiring personal sanctity (karamah). Hence, his critique of Sufism is based on the synthesis between Ghazalian form of paradigm with that of Khaldunian system of thought. While Amin has not paid enough attention to Sufism in his studies, deeper look at his world-view reveals that his interest to this spiritual dimension of Islam is unrivalled
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿明社会理论中对苏菲主义的批判
艾哈迈德·阿明以他的改革思想而闻名。他的思想涵盖了广泛的问题。然而,很少有人研究他对苏菲主义的看法。本文旨在填补这一空白。作为一名历史学家、社会学家和哲学家,阿明对如何对待苏菲主义有很多看法。这篇论文认为,像许多改革派一样,阿明不愿意接受苏菲主义的某些方面——尤其是哲学方面——并认为它们是毫无根据的、无用的和非历史的。这些应该被抛弃,因为它们对穆斯林社区没有任何帮助。他的智力项目旨在将苏非主义作为一种道德体系——即伽扎里亚体系——加以区分。但与此同时,他也像伊本·赫勒敦一样提出,苏菲主义应该被视为实现共同利益(maslahah)的一种手段,而不是获得个人神圣(karamah)。因此,他对苏非主义的批判是建立在伽扎里范式与哈勒都尼思想体系的综合之上的。虽然阿明在他的研究中没有对苏菲派给予足够的关注,但深入研究他的世界观就会发现,他对伊斯兰教精神层面的兴趣是无与伦比的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
TRADISI GHATIB BEGHANYUT SEBUAH PERADABAN ISLAM PADA MASYARAKAT SIAK SRI INDRAPURA, RIAU Hikayat Raja Pasai Sebagai Sumber Historiografi Menurut Perspektif Syed M. Naquib Al-Attas Antara Salafi dan Sufi: Tasawuf menurut Ibn Taimiyyah dan al-Qusyairi Hasan Langgulung Thought on Islamic Education Character Transformation of Naposo Nauli Bulung in Religious Practice in South Tapanuli Regency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1