Neuroedumyhts: A Contribution from Socioneuroscience to the Right to Education for All

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Qualitative Research in Education Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.17583/qre.10795
Sandra Racionero-Plaza, R. Flecha, Sara Carbonell, Alfonso Rodriguez-Oramas
{"title":"Neuroedumyhts: A Contribution from Socioneuroscience to the Right to Education for All","authors":"Sandra Racionero-Plaza, R. Flecha, Sara Carbonell, Alfonso Rodriguez-Oramas","doi":"10.17583/qre.10795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientific literature about neuromyths has proliferated in the last few years. However, there is a gap of knowledge around neuroedumyths. While neuromyths are based on hoaxes about the brain, neuroedumyths use neuroscientific concepts but state consequences for education that are false. This article presents, for the first time, research about neuroedumyths among teachers. This study has applied the innovative methodology of Public Lectures’ Debates Analytics (PLDA), in its ex-post modality. This has meant the analysis, by the twelve participants interviewed in this research, of the conclusions of public lectures’ debates on neuroscience and education. The results show the presence of four neuroedumyths among teachers: The brain needs to be bored to develop; Violence resides in masculine genes; Brain develops almost completely the first three years of life; and There are right-hemisphere students and left-hemisphere students. While neuromyths have been spread among teachers by trainers specialized in education but lacking scientific information about neuroscience, neuroedumyths have been spread among teachers by neuroscientists lacking scientific information on education. Differently to some previous studies which approached this problem as teachers’ errors or ignorance, the results of our study show that the problem is the errors of some teachers’ trainers.","PeriodicalId":42606,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.10795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientific literature about neuromyths has proliferated in the last few years. However, there is a gap of knowledge around neuroedumyths. While neuromyths are based on hoaxes about the brain, neuroedumyths use neuroscientific concepts but state consequences for education that are false. This article presents, for the first time, research about neuroedumyths among teachers. This study has applied the innovative methodology of Public Lectures’ Debates Analytics (PLDA), in its ex-post modality. This has meant the analysis, by the twelve participants interviewed in this research, of the conclusions of public lectures’ debates on neuroscience and education. The results show the presence of four neuroedumyths among teachers: The brain needs to be bored to develop; Violence resides in masculine genes; Brain develops almost completely the first three years of life; and There are right-hemisphere students and left-hemisphere students. While neuromyths have been spread among teachers by trainers specialized in education but lacking scientific information about neuroscience, neuroedumyths have been spread among teachers by neuroscientists lacking scientific information on education. Differently to some previous studies which approached this problem as teachers’ errors or ignorance, the results of our study show that the problem is the errors of some teachers’ trainers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经科学:社会神经科学对全民受教育权的贡献
在过去的几年里,关于神经神话的科学文献激增。然而,关于神经神话的知识还存在空白。神经神话是建立在关于大脑的骗局之上的,而神经神话则是利用神经科学的概念,但所陈述的教育后果是错误的。本文首次提出了关于教师神经神话的研究。本研究采用了公共讲座辩论分析(PLDA)的创新方法,采用了前后模式。这意味着,在这项研究中接受采访的12位参与者对公开讲座中关于神经科学和教育的辩论结论进行了分析。结果表明,教师中存在四个神经误区:大脑需要无聊才能发展;暴力存在于男性基因中;大脑在生命的头三年几乎发育完全;有右半球学生和左半球学生。神经神话是由缺乏神经科学知识的教育专业培训师在教师中传播的,而神经科学神话是由缺乏教育科学知识的神经科学家在教师中传播的。与以往的一些研究将这一问题归结为教师的错误或无知不同,我们的研究结果表明,问题在于一些教师培训师的错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Qualitative Research in Education
Qualitative Research in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
4
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Role of Social Networks to Counteract Stigmatization Toward Gay and Bisexual Men Regarding Monkeypox Experiencias de Jóvenes en Contextos de Vulnerabilidad Social durante la COVID-19: Narrativas Combinadas con Foto-Elicitación Democratizing Taste on Classical Music for All Necesidades y propuestas para la intervención con menores y violencia de género desde la educación The Mediation of Music in the Development of Intrapersonal and Action Skills in Early Teacher Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1