Herbivore rewilding does not promote biodiversity in Argentine Andean peatlands

IF 3.3 2区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Anthropocene Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ancene.2023.100382
Carlos J. Navarro , Julieta Carilla , Oriana Osinaga Acosta , Carolina Nieto , Ramiro Ovejero , H. Ricardo Grau
{"title":"Herbivore rewilding does not promote biodiversity in Argentine Andean peatlands","authors":"Carlos J. Navarro ,&nbsp;Julieta Carilla ,&nbsp;Oriana Osinaga Acosta ,&nbsp;Carolina Nieto ,&nbsp;Ramiro Ovejero ,&nbsp;H. Ricardo Grau","doi":"10.1016/j.ancene.2023.100382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Argentine Puna is an example of rewilding of the herbivore community, with wild camelids recovering (mainly vicuñas, <em>Vicugna vicugna</em> and guanacos <em>Lama guanicoe</em><span><span><span><span>) while livestock decreases. Peatlands are the most diverse ecosystem in the region and are key resources for herbivores. Here, we tested the hypothesis that herbivore rewilding is associated with higher biodiversity of three biological groups: plants, aquatic </span>macroinvertebrates<span>, and birds. We sampled 50 peatlands distributed in the Argentine Puna, along an elevation range from 3200 to 4700 m asl. Using Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS), we developed a “wilderness index” that combines different proxies of pastoral use (herbivore feces, “puestos”, accessibility to human settlements, field counts of herbivores). In general, the diversity of the different groups was negatively correlated with elevation and positively correlated with peatland area, thus we used the residuals of a model to control for these two variables and test for the correlation between biodiversity patterns (Shannon index and richness) and peatland wilderness index. Contrary to our expectations, diversity of plant and macroinvertebrate communities’ showed slightly negative statistically significant correlations with wilderness, while birds showed no statistical association. Potential explanations for this pattern include (1) diversity of microhabitats generated by a more diverse herbivore's community associated with livestock (e.g., different trampling, browsing, and movement patterns, effects on water quality through feces), (2) management of </span></span>hydrological regimes and stocking rates to provide stability, (3) </span>herbivory dynamics that promote the dominance of certain plants. Overall, the results reject the hypothesis that herbivore rewilding automatically results in biodiversity gains, and emphasize the importance of understanding the socio-ecological mechanisms by which human land use (including exotic livestock) contributes to the biodiversity maintenance in these key ecosystems.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":56021,"journal":{"name":"Anthropocene","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100382"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropocene","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213305423000152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Argentine Puna is an example of rewilding of the herbivore community, with wild camelids recovering (mainly vicuñas, Vicugna vicugna and guanacos Lama guanicoe) while livestock decreases. Peatlands are the most diverse ecosystem in the region and are key resources for herbivores. Here, we tested the hypothesis that herbivore rewilding is associated with higher biodiversity of three biological groups: plants, aquatic macroinvertebrates, and birds. We sampled 50 peatlands distributed in the Argentine Puna, along an elevation range from 3200 to 4700 m asl. Using Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS), we developed a “wilderness index” that combines different proxies of pastoral use (herbivore feces, “puestos”, accessibility to human settlements, field counts of herbivores). In general, the diversity of the different groups was negatively correlated with elevation and positively correlated with peatland area, thus we used the residuals of a model to control for these two variables and test for the correlation between biodiversity patterns (Shannon index and richness) and peatland wilderness index. Contrary to our expectations, diversity of plant and macroinvertebrate communities’ showed slightly negative statistically significant correlations with wilderness, while birds showed no statistical association. Potential explanations for this pattern include (1) diversity of microhabitats generated by a more diverse herbivore's community associated with livestock (e.g., different trampling, browsing, and movement patterns, effects on water quality through feces), (2) management of hydrological regimes and stocking rates to provide stability, (3) herbivory dynamics that promote the dominance of certain plants. Overall, the results reject the hypothesis that herbivore rewilding automatically results in biodiversity gains, and emphasize the importance of understanding the socio-ecological mechanisms by which human land use (including exotic livestock) contributes to the biodiversity maintenance in these key ecosystems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿根廷安第斯泥炭地的草食动物复育并不能促进生物多样性
阿根廷的普那是草食动物群落恢复野生化的一个例子,野生骆驼恢复(主要是vicuñas, Vicugna Vicugna和guanacos Lama guanicoe),而牲畜减少。泥炭地是该地区最多样化的生态系统,也是食草动物的重要资源。在这里,我们测试了一个假设,即草食动物的回归与三个生物群体(植物、水生大型无脊椎动物和鸟类)的更高生物多样性有关。我们对分布在阿根廷普纳的50个泥炭地进行了采样,这些泥炭地的海拔范围从3200米到4700米不等。利用非度量多维尺度(NMDS),我们开发了一个“荒野指数”,该指数结合了不同的畜牧利用指标(草食动物粪便、“puestos”、人类住区可达性、草食动物野外数量)。总体而言,不同类群的多样性与海拔高度呈负相关,与泥炭地面积呈正相关,因此我们利用模型残差对这两个变量进行控制,并检验生物多样性格局(Shannon指数和丰富度)与泥炭地荒野指数之间的相关性。与我们的预期相反,植物和大型无脊椎动物群落的多样性与荒野呈统计学上的负相关,而鸟类则没有统计学上的相关性。对这种模式的潜在解释包括:(1)与牲畜相关的更多样化的草食动物群落产生的微生境多样性(例如,不同的践踏、浏览和运动模式,通过粪便对水质的影响);(2)水文制度和放养率的管理以提供稳定性;(3)促进某些植物优势的草食动态。总体而言,研究结果否定了草食动物回归会自动增加生物多样性的假设,并强调了理解人类土地利用(包括外来牲畜)对这些关键生态系统中生物多样性维持的社会生态机制的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropocene
Anthropocene Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
102 days
期刊介绍: Anthropocene is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes peer-reviewed works addressing the nature, scale, and extent of interactions that people have with Earth processes and systems. The scope of the journal includes the significance of human activities in altering Earth’s landscapes, oceans, the atmosphere, cryosphere, and ecosystems over a range of time and space scales - from global phenomena over geologic eras to single isolated events - including the linkages, couplings, and feedbacks among physical, chemical, and biological components of Earth systems. The journal also addresses how such alterations can have profound effects on, and implications for, human society. As the scale and pace of human interactions with Earth systems have intensified in recent decades, understanding human-induced alterations in the past and present is critical to our ability to anticipate, mitigate, and adapt to changes in the future. The journal aims to provide a venue to focus research findings, discussions, and debates toward advancing predictive understanding of human interactions with Earth systems - one of the grand challenges of our time.
期刊最新文献
Adapt research to the Anthropocene Rethinking the Anthropocene: Not a time-transgressive event but a sudden rupture on the geologic time scale Human-induced landscape modification in the in the last two centuries in the Po delta plain (Northern Italy) The environmental consequences of rapid urbanization in central Florida reconstructed with high resolution 241Am and 210Pb dating in lake sediments Anthropocene on the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau: A Holocene perspective from multiple sedimentary records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1