Out of the Binary and Beyond the Spectrum: Redefining and Reclaiming Native American Race

IF 1.3 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES Critical Philosophy of Race Pub Date : 2018-07-11 DOI:10.5325/CRITPHILRACE.6.2.0216
Alex R. Steers-Mccrum
{"title":"Out of the Binary and Beyond the Spectrum: Redefining and Reclaiming Native American Race","authors":"Alex R. Steers-Mccrum","doi":"10.5325/CRITPHILRACE.6.2.0216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Race in the United States is most often talked about in terms of black and white, sometimes as a spectrum running from whiteness to blackness. Such a conception does not map onto actual racial structures in the United States and excludes Native Americans. This article will criticize this binary, detailing a theory of race in which colonialism and racism are prior to racial formation, following Patrick Wolfe and Michael Omi and Howard Winant. In assembling this theory, this article attempts to bridge philosophical critical race studies and Native American and Indigenous Peoples studies. It argues that to be a member of a race is to be in a relationship of dominance and resistance with settler colonialism. It discusses the implications of a political mode (following Tommie Shelby) of Native race in greater detail, including how it can be differentiated from ethnicity and tribal identity, and how it might be politically useful in anti-domination solidarity. Finally, the article examines the similarities and differences between Native race as construed here and concepts of being Indigenous, suggesting that what Indigenous is at the global level, Native race may be at the local.","PeriodicalId":43337,"journal":{"name":"Critical Philosophy of Race","volume":"6 1","pages":"216 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Philosophy of Race","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CRITPHILRACE.6.2.0216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:Race in the United States is most often talked about in terms of black and white, sometimes as a spectrum running from whiteness to blackness. Such a conception does not map onto actual racial structures in the United States and excludes Native Americans. This article will criticize this binary, detailing a theory of race in which colonialism and racism are prior to racial formation, following Patrick Wolfe and Michael Omi and Howard Winant. In assembling this theory, this article attempts to bridge philosophical critical race studies and Native American and Indigenous Peoples studies. It argues that to be a member of a race is to be in a relationship of dominance and resistance with settler colonialism. It discusses the implications of a political mode (following Tommie Shelby) of Native race in greater detail, including how it can be differentiated from ethnicity and tribal identity, and how it might be politically useful in anti-domination solidarity. Finally, the article examines the similarities and differences between Native race as construed here and concepts of being Indigenous, suggesting that what Indigenous is at the global level, Native race may be at the local.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走出二元和超越光谱:重新定义和开垦美洲原住民
摘要:在美国,人们最常谈论的是黑人和白人,有时也会把种族划分为从白人到黑人的光谱。这样的概念并没有映射到美国实际的种族结构,也不包括印第安人。本文将批评这种二元对立,详述殖民主义和种族主义先于种族形成的种族理论,跟随帕特里克·沃尔夫、迈克尔·奥米和霍华德·温南特的观点。在整合这一理论的过程中,本文试图将哲学批判种族研究与美洲原住民和土著民族研究联系起来。它认为,作为一个种族的一员,就意味着与定居者殖民主义处于一种统治和抵抗的关系中。它更详细地讨论了土著种族的政治模式(遵循Tommie Shelby)的含义,包括如何将其与种族和部落身份区分开来,以及它如何在反统治团结中发挥政治作用。最后,本文考察了这里所解释的土著种族与土著概念之间的异同,表明土著在全球层面上是什么,土著种族可能在当地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Philosophy of Race
Critical Philosophy of Race ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The critical philosophy of race consists in the philosophical examination of issues raised by the concept of race, the practices and mechanisms of racialization, and the persistence of various forms of racism across the world. Critical philosophy of race is a critical enterprise in three respects: it opposes racism in all its forms; it rejects the pseudosciences of old-fashioned biological racialism; and it denies that anti-racism and anti-racialism summarily eliminate race as a meaningful category of analysis. Critical philosophy of race is a philosophical enterprise because of its engagement with traditional philosophical questions and in its readiness to engage critically some of the traditional answers.
期刊最新文献
Being Black and Woman in a Racist and Sexist Society: Locating an Existential Standpoint Philosophy in Mamphela Ramphele’s Autobiography Race, Intellectual Racism, and the Opened Door Rodney, Mills, and Rousseau: Revisiting the Social Contract Idea “Why Race Still Matters” Can Iqaba Possess Ontological Legitimacy?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1