{"title":"Environmental justice beyond physical access: rethinking Black American utilization of urban public green spaces","authors":"Eunyque Sykes","doi":"10.1080/23251042.2022.2057649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Black Americans have historically reported aversive attitudes towards the outdoors. First, cultural meanings of the natural world are shaped by historical legacies of racial violence and racialized slavery. Second, public policies after slavery continued to reproduce the separation of Black Americans from green spaces. Thus, Black Americans have developed preferences for more cultivated green spaces as an adaptation to these structural exclusions. This study explored how Black women participating in outdoor activities in Franklin Park experienced the outdoors. The Black women interviewed reported managing facial and bodily expressions, when they are participating in outdoor activities outside of Franklin Park, in order to negotiate the contradictions of racialized outdoor spaces. To explain this, I developed the concept of racialized emotional labor which is: (1) mediation of structural and/or individual racism: required to participate in dynamics where they are systematically racially objectified, (2) hyperawareness of Blackness: required to participate in the minimization of their racial objectification. This study argues that Black women engage in racialized emotional labor in uncultivated green spaces and rural areas because the areas aren't welcoming towards Black people and do not foster a sense of comfortability and belonging, compared to urban parks with diverse crowds like Franklin Park.","PeriodicalId":54173,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sociology","volume":"8 1","pages":"388 - 399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2022.2057649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
ABSTRACT Black Americans have historically reported aversive attitudes towards the outdoors. First, cultural meanings of the natural world are shaped by historical legacies of racial violence and racialized slavery. Second, public policies after slavery continued to reproduce the separation of Black Americans from green spaces. Thus, Black Americans have developed preferences for more cultivated green spaces as an adaptation to these structural exclusions. This study explored how Black women participating in outdoor activities in Franklin Park experienced the outdoors. The Black women interviewed reported managing facial and bodily expressions, when they are participating in outdoor activities outside of Franklin Park, in order to negotiate the contradictions of racialized outdoor spaces. To explain this, I developed the concept of racialized emotional labor which is: (1) mediation of structural and/or individual racism: required to participate in dynamics where they are systematically racially objectified, (2) hyperawareness of Blackness: required to participate in the minimization of their racial objectification. This study argues that Black women engage in racialized emotional labor in uncultivated green spaces and rural areas because the areas aren't welcoming towards Black people and do not foster a sense of comfortability and belonging, compared to urban parks with diverse crowds like Franklin Park.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Sociology is dedicated to applying and advancing the sociological imagination in relation to a wide variety of environmental challenges, controversies and issues, at every level from the global to local, from ‘world culture’ to diverse local perspectives. As an international, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, Environmental Sociology aims to stretch the conceptual and theoretical boundaries of both environmental and mainstream sociology, to highlight the relevance of sociological research for environmental policy and management, to disseminate the results of sociological research, and to engage in productive dialogue and debate with other disciplines in the social, natural and ecological sciences. Contributions may utilize a variety of theoretical orientations including, but not restricted to: critical theory, cultural sociology, ecofeminism, ecological modernization, environmental justice, organizational sociology, political ecology, political economy, post-colonial studies, risk theory, social psychology, science and technology studies, globalization, world-systems analysis, and so on. Cross- and transdisciplinary contributions are welcome where they demonstrate a novel attempt to understand social-ecological relationships in a manner that engages with the core concerns of sociology in social relationships, institutions, practices and processes. All methodological approaches in the environmental social sciences – qualitative, quantitative, integrative, spatial, policy analysis, etc. – are welcomed. Environmental Sociology welcomes high-quality submissions from scholars around the world.