{"title":"Science Up in Smoke: One Psychiatrist’s Journey Through the Politics of Cannabis Legalization","authors":"D. Rettew","doi":"10.2174/2210676611666210125085400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nMany states are currently considering legislature that would legalize and commercialize cannabis\nfor medical and recreational purposes. Physicians and other health professionals are frequently called upon to offer an expert\nopinion on the public health implications of these bills. For many, the role as a scientific expert and advocate in a political\nprocess is new.\n\n\n\nTo outline themes and lessons learned for science-minded clinicians engaged in deliberations over cannabis\nlegislation.\n\n\n\nTo describe how science can get used and misused in the political process.\n\n\n\n\nThis article describes the experience of a psychiatrist who was actively involved in one state’s deliberations through\ncannabis legalization bills.\n\n\n\nMajor themes that emerged during the process are described as are recommendations\nfor other health professionals who may find themselves involved in similar processes related to cannabis legalization and\nother controversial initiatives that rely on the interpretation of scientific information.\n\n\n\nPsychiatrists and other clinicians can make important contributions to the political process for legislative\ndebates that involve science-based mental health information.\n","PeriodicalId":43326,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2210676611666210125085400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Many states are currently considering legislature that would legalize and commercialize cannabis
for medical and recreational purposes. Physicians and other health professionals are frequently called upon to offer an expert
opinion on the public health implications of these bills. For many, the role as a scientific expert and advocate in a political
process is new.
To outline themes and lessons learned for science-minded clinicians engaged in deliberations over cannabis
legislation.
To describe how science can get used and misused in the political process.
This article describes the experience of a psychiatrist who was actively involved in one state’s deliberations through
cannabis legalization bills.
Major themes that emerged during the process are described as are recommendations
for other health professionals who may find themselves involved in similar processes related to cannabis legalization and
other controversial initiatives that rely on the interpretation of scientific information.
Psychiatrists and other clinicians can make important contributions to the political process for legislative
debates that involve science-based mental health information.
期刊介绍:
Adolescent Psychiatry a peer-reviewed journal, aims to provide mental health professionals who work with adolescents with current information relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric disorders in adolescents. Adolescent Psychiatry reports of original research, critical reviews of topics relevant to practitioners, clinical observations with analysis and discussion, analysis of philosophical, ethical or social aspects of the fields of psychiatry and mental health, case reports with discussions, letters, and position papers. Topics include adolescent development and developmental psychopathology, psychotherapy and other psychosocial treatment approaches, psychopharmacology, and service settings and programs. The primary focus of the work should be on adolescents, transition-aged youth, The primary focus of the work should be on adolescents, transition-aged youth, or emerging adults, that is, persons 12-24 years of age . Articles on families of adolescents, or adults who have been followed since adolescence will also be considered.