Preemptive Impunity: The Constituent Power of Trump's Make America Great Again Movement

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES Boundary 2-An International Journal of Literature and Culture Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1215/01903659-10192102
D. Pease
{"title":"Preemptive Impunity: The Constituent Power of Trump's Make America Great Again Movement","authors":"D. Pease","doi":"10.1215/01903659-10192102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n How and why have freedom and social hierarchies and exclusions become fused in Trump's America? What causative factors can explain the emergence within twenty-first century US political culture of a movement notorious for its attacks on basic norms of tolerance, civility, and human decency? In their efforts to respond to such questions, prominent historians, political commentators, and theorists have correlated Trump's rise to political power in terms of his transmogrification of a large segment of the American populace into US liberal democracy's fascist totalitarian Other. While Trump's illiberal pronouncements and actions do indeed bear a resemblance to the political behavior of European fascists, the Americanness of Trump's conquest disposition might be better understood as his resurrection of an archaic variant of liberalism practiced by American settler colonists throughout the expansionist era of US history. How did President Trump persuade or provoke a broad swath of US citizens, who were for the most part accustomed to consider the principles and institutions of liberal democracy essential components of American democracy, to regard his settler conquest disposition as representatively American? What enabled Trump to advocate with preemptive impunity the demolition of liberal institutions and principles? How could he serve simultaneously as the president of the world's most powerful liberal democracy and leader of an insurrectionary movement of latter-day settler colonists? In an effort to address these questions, this essay engages Trump's March 23, 2011, endorsement of Birtherism; Trump's unauthorized transfer of power at the January 20, 2017, inauguration; Trump's August 12–15, 2017, statements about the Charlottesville protest; and Trump's role in the January 6, 2021, insurrection as distinct but interrelated moments in Trump's production of this settler-colonist conquest disposition.","PeriodicalId":46332,"journal":{"name":"Boundary 2-An International Journal of Literature and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boundary 2-An International Journal of Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-10192102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How and why have freedom and social hierarchies and exclusions become fused in Trump's America? What causative factors can explain the emergence within twenty-first century US political culture of a movement notorious for its attacks on basic norms of tolerance, civility, and human decency? In their efforts to respond to such questions, prominent historians, political commentators, and theorists have correlated Trump's rise to political power in terms of his transmogrification of a large segment of the American populace into US liberal democracy's fascist totalitarian Other. While Trump's illiberal pronouncements and actions do indeed bear a resemblance to the political behavior of European fascists, the Americanness of Trump's conquest disposition might be better understood as his resurrection of an archaic variant of liberalism practiced by American settler colonists throughout the expansionist era of US history. How did President Trump persuade or provoke a broad swath of US citizens, who were for the most part accustomed to consider the principles and institutions of liberal democracy essential components of American democracy, to regard his settler conquest disposition as representatively American? What enabled Trump to advocate with preemptive impunity the demolition of liberal institutions and principles? How could he serve simultaneously as the president of the world's most powerful liberal democracy and leader of an insurrectionary movement of latter-day settler colonists? In an effort to address these questions, this essay engages Trump's March 23, 2011, endorsement of Birtherism; Trump's unauthorized transfer of power at the January 20, 2017, inauguration; Trump's August 12–15, 2017, statements about the Charlottesville protest; and Trump's role in the January 6, 2021, insurrection as distinct but interrelated moments in Trump's production of this settler-colonist conquest disposition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先发制人的有罪不罚:特朗普“让美国再次伟大”运动的组成力量
自由、社会等级制度和排斥是如何以及为什么在特朗普的美国融合在一起的?是什么原因可以解释21世纪美国政治文化中出现了一场因攻击宽容、文明和人类尊严的基本准则而臭名昭著的运动?在回应这些问题的过程中,著名历史学家、政治评论家和理论家将特朗普的政治权力崛起与他将一大部分美国民众转变为美国自由民主的法西斯极权主义“他者”联系起来。虽然特朗普的不自由言论和行动确实与欧洲法西斯主义者的政治行为相似,但特朗普征服倾向的美国性可能更好地理解为他复活了美国历史上扩张主义时代美国定居者殖民者所信奉的一种古老的自由主义变体。特朗普总统是如何说服或激怒广大美国公民的,他们在很大程度上习惯于认为自由民主的原则和制度是美国民主的重要组成部分,并将他的定居者征服倾向视为具有代表性的美国人?是什么让特朗普能够先发制人地主张废除自由主义制度和原则?他怎么能同时担任世界上最强大的自由民主国家的总统和现代定居者殖民者叛乱运动的领导人呢?为了解决这些问题,本文引用了特朗普2011年3月23日对生育权的支持;特朗普在2017年1月20日的就职典礼上未经授权移交权力;特朗普2017年8月12日至15日关于夏洛茨维尔抗议活动的声明;以及特朗普在2021年1月6日的暴动中所扮演的角色,是特朗普制造这种定居者-殖民者征服倾向的独特但相互关联的时刻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Extending beyond the postmodern, boundary 2, an international journal of literature and culture, approaches problems in these areas from a number of politically, historically, and theoretically informed perspectives. boundary 2 remains committed to understanding the present and approaching the study of national and international culture and politics through literature and the human sciences.
期刊最新文献
Spoiled History: Leprosy and the Lessons of Queer Medieval Historiography A Bridge Too Far? Ludovico Marracci's Translation of the Qurʾan and the Persistence of Medieval Biblicism Race, Medieval Studies, and Disciplinary Boundaries Belle da Costa Greene and the Undoing of “Medieval” Studies Making Islam (Coherent): Academic Discourse and the Politics of Language
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1