Spray drift-based pesticide residues on untreated edible crops grown near agricultural areas

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety Pub Date : 2022-01-17 DOI:10.1007/s00003-021-01355-9
Hannah Bolz, Christian Sieke, Britta Michalski, Ralf B. Schäfer, Roland Kubiak
{"title":"Spray drift-based pesticide residues on untreated edible crops grown near agricultural areas","authors":"Hannah Bolz,&nbsp;Christian Sieke,&nbsp;Britta Michalski,&nbsp;Ralf B. Schäfer,&nbsp;Roland Kubiak","doi":"10.1007/s00003-021-01355-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We aimed to quantify spray drift-based exposure of fruits and vegetables grown in gardens or allotments next to agricultural areas to plant protection products (PPP). The amount of spray drift transported into gardens during the treatment of tall growing crops or field crops was simulated. Two different test systems in an outdoor wind tunnel were used, approximating conditions for the application to both crop types. For the experiments, strawberries, tomatoes and lettuce were used representing non-target food crops in gardens. After spraying, distance-related residues of the tracer pyranine were measured on the three food crops positioned 1–15 m downwind in the non-target area. Additionally, petri dishes were placed in front of the food crops to measure the ground deposition concurrently. For both scenarios, good correlation of residues on the non-target food crops and the ground deposition was found (linear regression model, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.88–0.97). But unlike the field crops scenario, the experimental setup of the tall growing crops shows large deviations from the field situation, not allowing the transfer of the results to the field situation. The results of the wind tunnel experiments and of field trials on ground deposition were used to estimate the amount of PPP residues on food crops cultivated near agricultural fields. For example, application of a pesticide (1.3 kg active ingredient per ha<sup>−1</sup>) to field crops was estimated to result in residue levels of 0.39 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> on lettuce, 0.32 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> on strawberries, and 0.06 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> on tomatoes cultivated 5 m from the field, thus indicating an exceedance of the default maximum residue level (MRL) (0.01 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>). Therefore, further in-depth studies are required to broaden the range of non-target crops and to refine the tall growing crop scenario to allow estimations of spray drift-based residues.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":622,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety","volume":"17 1","pages":"21 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00003-021-01355-9.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00003-021-01355-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

We aimed to quantify spray drift-based exposure of fruits and vegetables grown in gardens or allotments next to agricultural areas to plant protection products (PPP). The amount of spray drift transported into gardens during the treatment of tall growing crops or field crops was simulated. Two different test systems in an outdoor wind tunnel were used, approximating conditions for the application to both crop types. For the experiments, strawberries, tomatoes and lettuce were used representing non-target food crops in gardens. After spraying, distance-related residues of the tracer pyranine were measured on the three food crops positioned 1–15 m downwind in the non-target area. Additionally, petri dishes were placed in front of the food crops to measure the ground deposition concurrently. For both scenarios, good correlation of residues on the non-target food crops and the ground deposition was found (linear regression model, R2 = 0.88–0.97). But unlike the field crops scenario, the experimental setup of the tall growing crops shows large deviations from the field situation, not allowing the transfer of the results to the field situation. The results of the wind tunnel experiments and of field trials on ground deposition were used to estimate the amount of PPP residues on food crops cultivated near agricultural fields. For example, application of a pesticide (1.3 kg active ingredient per ha−1) to field crops was estimated to result in residue levels of 0.39 mg kg−1 on lettuce, 0.32 mg kg−1 on strawberries, and 0.06 mg kg−1 on tomatoes cultivated 5 m from the field, thus indicating an exceedance of the default maximum residue level (MRL) (0.01 mg kg−1). Therefore, further in-depth studies are required to broaden the range of non-target crops and to refine the tall growing crop scenario to allow estimations of spray drift-based residues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在农业附近种植的未经处理的食用作物上喷洒基于漂移的农药残留物
我们的目的是量化种植在花园或农田旁的水果和蔬菜对植物保护产品(PPP)的喷雾漂移暴露。模拟了在处理高大作物和大田作物过程中,喷雾剂的漂移量。在室外风洞中使用了两种不同的测试系统,近似于两种作物类型的应用条件。在实验中,草莓、西红柿和生菜被用来代表花园中的非目标粮食作物。喷洒后,在非目标区下风1-15 m的三种粮食作物上测量示踪剂吡嗪的距离相关残留量。此外,在粮食作物前放置培养皿,同时测量地面沉积。两种情况下,非目标粮食作物残留与地面沉积均存在良好的相关性(线性回归模型,R2 = 0.88-0.97)。但与大田作物不同的是,高大作物的实验设置与田间情况偏差较大,不允许将结果转移到田间情况。风洞试验和地面沉积田间试验的结果被用来估计农田附近种植的粮食作物上PPP的残留量。例如,在田间作物上施用农药(每公顷1.3公斤有效成分),估计会导致生菜的残留水平为0.39 mg kg - 1,草莓为0.32 mg kg - 1,距离田地5米的西红柿为0.06 mg kg - 1,从而表明超出了默认最大残留水平(MRL) (0.01 mg kg - 1)。因此,需要进一步深入研究,以扩大非目标作物的范围,并完善高大作物情景,以允许估计喷雾漂移的残留物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JCF publishes peer-reviewed original Research Articles and Opinions that are of direct importance to Food and Feed Safety. This includes Food Packaging, Consumer Products as well as Plant Protection Products, Food Microbiology, Veterinary Drugs, Animal Welfare and Genetic Engineering. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve Consumer Health Protection. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of Food and Feed Safety issues on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of Food and Feed Safety and Consumer Health Protection. Manuscripts – preferably written in English but also in German – are published as Research Articles, Reviews, Methods and Short Communications and should cover aspects including, but not limited to: · Factors influencing Food and Feed Safety · Factors influencing Consumer Health Protection · Factors influencing Consumer Behavior · Exposure science related to Risk Assessment and Risk Management · Regulatory aspects related to Food and Feed Safety, Food Packaging, Consumer Products, Plant Protection Products, Food Microbiology, Veterinary Drugs, Animal Welfare and Genetic Engineering · Analytical methods and method validation related to food control and food processing. The JCF also presents important News, as well as Announcements and Reports about administrative surveillance.
期刊最新文献
Upcoming events Salt in foods: a definitive source of microplastics to humans Ubiquitous occurrence of organophosphate esters in plastic-made and paper-made food contact materials and their implication for human exposure Climate change and mycotoxins: a growing food safety concern ICP-OES analysis of Lithium in honey, royal jelly, bee bread, propolis, and bees following microwave-assisted sample preparation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1