Vowel deletion before sibilant-stop clusters in Latin: issues of syllabification, lexicon and diachrony

IF 0.2 0 CLASSICS Journal of Latin Linguistics Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1515/joll-2021-2005
Barbora Machajdíková, Ľudmila Buzássyová
{"title":"Vowel deletion before sibilant-stop clusters in Latin: issues of syllabification, lexicon and diachrony","authors":"Barbora Machajdíková, Ľudmila Buzássyová","doi":"10.1515/joll-2021-2005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Syncope of a short vowel before a cluster sT(R) (T: stop; R: l or r) is attested in Latin and Sabellic: Latin fēstra (beside fenestra), sēstertius, iuxtā, Oscan vezkeí, minstreis, Umbrian etuřstamu, mersto. This phenomenon raises important questions both for the historical phonology of the Italic languages and for the typological study of sT(R)-clusters. In Latin and Sabellic, syncope normally took place only in open syllables. Three competing strategies are possible in order to explain this paradox. (i) It has been argued that the cluster sT(R) was an onset, which would imply that the vowel standing before the cluster sT(R) was in an open syllable at the time of the syncope. (ii) It has been proposed that the sequence sT behaves as a single consonant. (iii) It could be assumed that the syncope did not take place in a closed syllable except if the closing consonant was s (or its allophone z). Furthermore, a careful study of the relevant material shows that in some Latin words a vowel standing before sT(R) may have been deleted by a phonological process distinct from the syncope stricto sensu (haplology, noundinum-rule).","PeriodicalId":29862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Latin Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Latin Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2021-2005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Syncope of a short vowel before a cluster sT(R) (T: stop; R: l or r) is attested in Latin and Sabellic: Latin fēstra (beside fenestra), sēstertius, iuxtā, Oscan vezkeí, minstreis, Umbrian etuřstamu, mersto. This phenomenon raises important questions both for the historical phonology of the Italic languages and for the typological study of sT(R)-clusters. In Latin and Sabellic, syncope normally took place only in open syllables. Three competing strategies are possible in order to explain this paradox. (i) It has been argued that the cluster sT(R) was an onset, which would imply that the vowel standing before the cluster sT(R) was in an open syllable at the time of the syncope. (ii) It has been proposed that the sequence sT behaves as a single consonant. (iii) It could be assumed that the syncope did not take place in a closed syllable except if the closing consonant was s (or its allophone z). Furthermore, a careful study of the relevant material shows that in some Latin words a vowel standing before sT(R) may have been deleted by a phonological process distinct from the syncope stricto sensu (haplology, noundinum-rule).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉丁语中sibilant stop簇之前的元音删除:音节划分、词汇和变时问题
短元音在连音sT(R)前晕厥(T: stop;R: l或R)在拉丁语和萨比利语中得到证实:拉丁语fēstra(在fenestra旁边),sēstertius, iuxtji, Oscan vezkeí, minstreis,翁布里亚etuřstamu, mersto。这一现象对意大利语的历史音韵学和sT(R)-集群的类型学研究都提出了重要的问题。在拉丁语和萨贝利克语中,晕厥通常只发生在开音节中。为了解释这一悖论,可能有三种竞争策略。(i)有人认为,集群sT(R)是一个开始,这意味着站在集群sT(R)之前的元音在晕厥时是在一个开放的音节中。(ii)有人提出,序列sT表现为单个辅音。(iii)可以假设晕厥不会发生在闭合音节中,除非闭合辅音是s(或它的音素z)。此外,对相关材料的仔细研究表明,在一些拉丁单词中,sT(R)之前的元音可能被一种不同于严格意义上的晕厥(单音节学,名词规则)的语音过程所删除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Future expressions in a sixth-century Latin translation of Josephus From deceit to pain: Late Latin dolus and the interplay between semantics and analogy Roman tablets as linguistic corpora: evidence for phonological variation in 2nd c. Latin Iterative or stative? New morphosemantic analyses of Latin lūgeō ‘mourn’ and doleō ‘feel pain’ Multiplication, addition, and subtraction in numerals: formal variation in Latin’s decads+ from an Indo-European perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1