Factors associated with contraception and induced abortion among young women in Nepal

Y. Karki
{"title":"Factors associated with contraception and induced abortion among young women in Nepal","authors":"Y. Karki","doi":"10.36922/ijps.v7i1.291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzed data from the 2016 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) supplemented by key indicators from several previous waves of NDHS to identify the sociodemographic profiles of women aged 15 – 24 who were using contraceptive methods and sought an abortion within 5 years before surveys. To augment the abortion analysis, field monitoring data of the Gorkha Safe Abortion (GSA) project were also used. Results from multivariable analyses show that women who ever gave a birth, who were from Province 1, who were economically well-off, and who knew the legal status of abortion, were more likely to practice contraception than their respective counterparts. Results, further, reveal that women practicing traditional methods of family planning were more likely to have an abortion than their counterparts not using any contraception. Women with two or more children ever born were more likely to have an abortion. Women from Karnali Province were most likely to have an abortion. Rich women were most likely to have an abortion than poor women. Regarding safe abortion, it is found that women living in the Tarai area were most likely to have a safe abortion than other geographic areas, due perhaps to family health services being more accessible in the Tarai area. Although the analyses found no relationship between age and abortions, perhaps due to small sample, the GSA project data clearly indicate that women under age 20, and those from Dalit community in particular, were more likely to seek an abortion than women aged 20 – 24. One lesson learned from the GSA project is that the pay-off for increasing access to safe abortion for hard-to-reach populations is high. To understand the complexity of sexual behaviors, contraceptive uses, and abortions among young women, more research using both qualitative and quantitative approaches are needed.","PeriodicalId":73473,"journal":{"name":"International journal of population studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of population studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.v7i1.291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzed data from the 2016 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) supplemented by key indicators from several previous waves of NDHS to identify the sociodemographic profiles of women aged 15 – 24 who were using contraceptive methods and sought an abortion within 5 years before surveys. To augment the abortion analysis, field monitoring data of the Gorkha Safe Abortion (GSA) project were also used. Results from multivariable analyses show that women who ever gave a birth, who were from Province 1, who were economically well-off, and who knew the legal status of abortion, were more likely to practice contraception than their respective counterparts. Results, further, reveal that women practicing traditional methods of family planning were more likely to have an abortion than their counterparts not using any contraception. Women with two or more children ever born were more likely to have an abortion. Women from Karnali Province were most likely to have an abortion. Rich women were most likely to have an abortion than poor women. Regarding safe abortion, it is found that women living in the Tarai area were most likely to have a safe abortion than other geographic areas, due perhaps to family health services being more accessible in the Tarai area. Although the analyses found no relationship between age and abortions, perhaps due to small sample, the GSA project data clearly indicate that women under age 20, and those from Dalit community in particular, were more likely to seek an abortion than women aged 20 – 24. One lesson learned from the GSA project is that the pay-off for increasing access to safe abortion for hard-to-reach populations is high. To understand the complexity of sexual behaviors, contraceptive uses, and abortions among young women, more research using both qualitative and quantitative approaches are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔年轻妇女避孕和人工流产的相关因素
本研究分析了2016年尼泊尔人口与健康调查(NDHS)的数据,并补充了前几波NDHS的关键指标,以确定调查前5年内使用避孕方法并寻求堕胎的15-24岁女性的社会人口特征。为了加强堕胎分析,还使用了廓尔喀安全堕胎项目的现场监测数据。多变量分析的结果表明,曾生育过孩子的女性,来自第一省,经济富裕,知道堕胎的法律地位,比各自的同龄人更有可能避孕。结果进一步表明,采用传统计划生育方法的女性比不使用任何避孕措施的女性更有可能堕胎。有两个或两个以上孩子的女性更有可能堕胎。卡纳利省的妇女最有可能堕胎。富裕女性比贫穷女性更有可能堕胎。关于安全堕胎,研究发现,与其他地理区域相比,生活在塔赖地区的妇女最有可能进行安全堕胎,这可能是因为塔赖地区更容易获得家庭卫生服务。尽管分析发现年龄与堕胎之间没有关系,可能是因为样本较少,但GSA项目数据清楚地表明,20岁以下的女性,尤其是达利特社区的女性,比20-24岁的女性更有可能寻求堕胎。从GSA项目中吸取的一个教训是,为难以接触的人群增加安全堕胎的机会所带来的回报很高。为了了解年轻女性性行为、避孕药具使用和堕胎的复杂性,需要更多的定性和定量研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Indian family relationships, marriage, and career choices in the context of globalization: A multigenerational evaluation Marital dissolution in India: Patterns and correlates COVID-19 and the precarious low-skilled workforce in the European Union: Time to call the shots? Assessment of prenatal care adequacy using different normative criteria in a municipality in Santa Catarina, Brazil Interstate outmigration in India and the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and emerging perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1