Welfare Washing: Disseminating Disinformation in Meat Marketing

IF 0.6 4区 农林科学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY Society & Animals Pub Date : 2021-01-26 DOI:10.1163/15685306-BJA10032
Kristian Bjørkdahl, K. Syse
{"title":"Welfare Washing: Disseminating Disinformation in Meat Marketing","authors":"Kristian Bjørkdahl, K. Syse","doi":"10.1163/15685306-BJA10032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn this article, our starting point is that people who are plagued by the so-called meat paradox must find ways of making meat consumption safe from the realities of meat production. They do this by way of various mechanisms of denial, which obfuscate contemporary industrial meat production. We focus on how advertisements become one notable vehicle of such denial, and select three examples for close reading. Focusing on the rhetorical techniques employed in three Norwegian ads for meat and how they mediate meat production to consumers, we argue that these ads all present an image of meat producers as progressive and caring proponents of animal welfare. This leads us to suggest that they exemplify a variant of greenwashing that we dub “welfare washing”—the main message of which is to keep calm and carry on consuming meat.","PeriodicalId":22000,"journal":{"name":"Society & Animals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society & Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-BJA10032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this article, our starting point is that people who are plagued by the so-called meat paradox must find ways of making meat consumption safe from the realities of meat production. They do this by way of various mechanisms of denial, which obfuscate contemporary industrial meat production. We focus on how advertisements become one notable vehicle of such denial, and select three examples for close reading. Focusing on the rhetorical techniques employed in three Norwegian ads for meat and how they mediate meat production to consumers, we argue that these ads all present an image of meat producers as progressive and caring proponents of animal welfare. This leads us to suggest that they exemplify a variant of greenwashing that we dub “welfare washing”—the main message of which is to keep calm and carry on consuming meat.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
福利清洗:在肉类营销中传播虚假信息
在这篇文章中,我们的出发点是,那些被所谓的肉类悖论所困扰的人们必须找到一种方法,使肉类消费从肉类生产的现实中解脱出来。他们通过各种否认机制来做到这一点,这混淆了当代工业肉类生产。我们关注的是广告如何成为这种否认的一个显著工具,并选择了三个例子进行仔细阅读。关注三个挪威肉类广告中使用的修辞技巧以及它们如何向消费者调解肉类生产,我们认为这些广告都呈现了肉类生产商作为动物福利进步和关怀支持者的形象。这让我们认为,它们是一种绿色清洗的例证,我们称之为“福利清洗”——其主要信息是保持冷静,继续吃肉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Society & Animals
Society & Animals 社会科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Society & Animals publishes studies that describe and analyze our experiences of non-human animals from the perspective of various disciplines within both the Social Sciences (e.g., psychology, sociology, anthropology, political science) and the Humanities (e.g., history, literary criticism). The journal specifically deals with subjects such as human-animal interactions in various settings (animal cruelty, the therapeutic uses of animals), the applied uses of animals (research, education, medicine and agriculture), the use of animals in popular culture (e.g. dog-fighting, circus, animal companion, animal research), attitudes toward animals as affected by different socializing agencies and strategies, representations of animals in literature, the history of the domestication of animals, the politics of animal welfare, and the constitution of the animal rights movement.
期刊最新文献
Toward Commensalism: Deconstructing the Intersectionality of Racism and Speciesism Foster Puppies as Therapeutic Partners: A Model for Mutual Benefit Effects of Human-Dolphin Interactions on Tourist Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Dolphins Coyote Killing: Where Species and Identities Collide Factors Associated with Children’s Humane Attitudes toward Animals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1