Strategies for Decentering the Narratives of Modernity: Goody, Wolff, Chakrabarty and Fabian – Part 1

Veronica Lazăr
{"title":"Strategies for Decentering the Narratives of Modernity: Goody, Wolff, Chakrabarty and Fabian – Part 1","authors":"Veronica Lazăr","doi":"10.58441/psf.v1i3.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This two-part article attempts to decipher four different critical strategiesfor decentering Eurocentrist narratives that promoted “the West”simultaneously as an agent, as a goal and as a yardstick for evaluatingmodernization processes across the globe: in the first part, it will examineJack Goody’s interrogation of the alleged European preeminence andexceptionalism and its imposition of value-laden temporal categorieson the non-Western world, as well as Eric Wolff ’s reconstruction ofthe so-called invention of “Eastern Europe” by the Western mindduring the Enlightenment; in the second part, it will take on DipeshChakrabarty’s notion of “provincializing” Western epistemology andJohannes Fabian’s focus on the “denial of coevalness” for non-Westerntemporalities. The article will focus on the analysis these four authorsprovided for the emergence of specific temporal and geographicalsystems that backed the epistemic hegemony of the “West” andreinforced, therefore, its already established political domination. It willalso examine the practice of translating spacial distance in historicaltime and its reverse, both at the core of Enlightenment and post-Enlightenment understanding and construction of the cultural andhistorical “other”.","PeriodicalId":34873,"journal":{"name":"Political Studies Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Studies Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58441/psf.v1i3.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This two-part article attempts to decipher four different critical strategiesfor decentering Eurocentrist narratives that promoted “the West”simultaneously as an agent, as a goal and as a yardstick for evaluatingmodernization processes across the globe: in the first part, it will examineJack Goody’s interrogation of the alleged European preeminence andexceptionalism and its imposition of value-laden temporal categorieson the non-Western world, as well as Eric Wolff ’s reconstruction ofthe so-called invention of “Eastern Europe” by the Western mindduring the Enlightenment; in the second part, it will take on DipeshChakrabarty’s notion of “provincializing” Western epistemology andJohannes Fabian’s focus on the “denial of coevalness” for non-Westerntemporalities. The article will focus on the analysis these four authorsprovided for the emergence of specific temporal and geographicalsystems that backed the epistemic hegemony of the “West” andreinforced, therefore, its already established political domination. It willalso examine the practice of translating spacial distance in historicaltime and its reverse, both at the core of Enlightenment and post-Enlightenment understanding and construction of the cultural andhistorical “other”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代性叙事去中心化的策略:古迪、沃尔夫、查克拉巴蒂和费边(上)
这篇由两部分组成的文章试图解读四种不同的批判策略,以分散欧洲中心主义叙事的注意力,这些叙事同时将“西方”作为代理人、目标和衡量全球现代化进程的标准:在第一部分中,它将考察杰克·古迪对所谓的欧洲卓越性和例外主义的质疑及其对非西方世界的时间范畴的强加,以及埃里克·沃尔夫对启蒙运动期间西方思想所谓的“东欧”发明的重建;第二部分论述了迪佩什·查克拉巴蒂关于西方认识论“地方化”的观点,以及约翰内斯·法比安关于非西方时间性“否认共同价值”的观点。本文将重点分析这四位作者为特定的时间和地理系统的出现所提供的支持,这些系统支持“西方”的认识霸权,并因此加强了其已经确立的政治统治。它还将从启蒙运动的核心和启蒙运动后对文化和历史“他者”的理解和建构的角度,考察在历史时间及其反向翻译空间距离的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A guidebook on fake news and online opinion altering agendas The European Peace Facility in action: rethinking EU-Africa partnership on peace and security? Populist Response to the Social Crisis in Denmark – How Iliberal-Authoritarian Populism Can Influence Newcomers? Analysis of Challenges to Ensuring Gender Equality in Science and Research: Recommended Policies for Republic of Moldova Mirroring the African Self and Mobility in Development Projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1