Denying a God of Mercy

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Religious Studies and Theology Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI:10.1558/rst.24834
Robert Wiznura
{"title":"Denying a God of Mercy","authors":"Robert Wiznura","doi":"10.1558/rst.24834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay concerns itself with notions of masculinity in John Milton’s Samson Agonistes. Essentially, the essay argues that the violence in the play is a direct result of concepts of masculinity and the projection of those concepts onto God. The characters in the play repeatedly fail to recognize a God of compassion or mercy, preferring to remain within their notions of a voluntarist, vindictive, vengeful, and violent God. The argument considers the relationship of the play with the Book of Judges before shifting its focus to the Chorus, particularly their activity in framing and controlling the narrative. The play gives us various hints as to why we should pause before following their interpretations. The essay then examines a motif of hands/touch, which intersects with the motif in Paradise Lost, but to very different outcomes. The ending of the play is catastrophic and a direct result of an adherence to a particular view of God and an inability to entertain other views.","PeriodicalId":40579,"journal":{"name":"Religious Studies and Theology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religious Studies and Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/rst.24834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay concerns itself with notions of masculinity in John Milton’s Samson Agonistes. Essentially, the essay argues that the violence in the play is a direct result of concepts of masculinity and the projection of those concepts onto God. The characters in the play repeatedly fail to recognize a God of compassion or mercy, preferring to remain within their notions of a voluntarist, vindictive, vengeful, and violent God. The argument considers the relationship of the play with the Book of Judges before shifting its focus to the Chorus, particularly their activity in framing and controlling the narrative. The play gives us various hints as to why we should pause before following their interpretations. The essay then examines a motif of hands/touch, which intersects with the motif in Paradise Lost, but to very different outcomes. The ending of the play is catastrophic and a direct result of an adherence to a particular view of God and an inability to entertain other views.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
否认慈悲之神
这篇文章关注的是约翰·米尔顿的《萨姆森·阿戈尼斯特》中的男子气概概念。从本质上讲,文章认为剧中的暴力是男性气质概念和这些概念投射到上帝身上的直接结果。剧中的角色一再不认识同情或怜悯的上帝,宁愿停留在他们心目中的自愿、报复、复仇和暴力的上帝。在将焦点转移到合唱之前,这场争论考虑了该剧与《法官之书》的关系,特别是他们在叙事框架和控制方面的活动。这出戏给了我们各种各样的暗示,为什么我们应该在遵循他们的解释之前停下来。然后,这篇文章考察了手/触摸的主题,它与《失乐园》中的主题相交,但结果截然不同。这部剧的结局是灾难性的,是坚持某种特定的上帝观而无法接受其他观点的直接结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
“A time will come…” Redeeming Memory “Community as church, church as community” Killing of Sambuka Overlooked: The Forgotten Stories of Canadian Christianity by James Robertson
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1