Concept generation techniques change patterns of brain activation during engineering design

IF 1.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Design Science Pub Date : 2020-11-27 DOI:10.1017/dsj.2020.30
Tripp Shealy, J. Gero, Mo Hu, J. Milovanovic
{"title":"Concept generation techniques change patterns of brain activation during engineering design","authors":"Tripp Shealy, J. Gero, Mo Hu, J. Milovanovic","doi":"10.1017/dsj.2020.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper presents the results of studying the brain activations of 30 engineering students when using three different design concept generation techniques: brainstorming, morphological analysis, and TRIZ. Changes in students’ brain activation in the prefrontal cortex were measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. The results are based on the area under the curve analysis of oxygenated hemodynamic response as well as an assessment of functional connectivity using Pearson’s correlation to compare students’ cognitive brain activations using these three different ideation techniques. The results indicate that brainstorming and morphological analysis demand more cognitive activation across the prefrontal cortex (PFC) compared to TRIZ. The highest cognitive activation when brainstorming and using morphological analysis is in the right dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC) and ventrolateral PFC. These regions are associated with divergent thinking and ill-defined problem-solving. TRIZ produces more cognitive activation in the left DLPFC. This region is associated with convergent thinking and making judgments. Morphological analysis and TRIZ also enable greater coordination (i.e., synchronized activation) between brain regions. These findings offer new evidence that structured techniques like TRIZ reduce cognitive activation, change patterns of activation and increase coordination between regions in the brain.","PeriodicalId":54146,"journal":{"name":"Design Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/dsj.2020.30","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents the results of studying the brain activations of 30 engineering students when using three different design concept generation techniques: brainstorming, morphological analysis, and TRIZ. Changes in students’ brain activation in the prefrontal cortex were measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. The results are based on the area under the curve analysis of oxygenated hemodynamic response as well as an assessment of functional connectivity using Pearson’s correlation to compare students’ cognitive brain activations using these three different ideation techniques. The results indicate that brainstorming and morphological analysis demand more cognitive activation across the prefrontal cortex (PFC) compared to TRIZ. The highest cognitive activation when brainstorming and using morphological analysis is in the right dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC) and ventrolateral PFC. These regions are associated with divergent thinking and ill-defined problem-solving. TRIZ produces more cognitive activation in the left DLPFC. This region is associated with convergent thinking and making judgments. Morphological analysis and TRIZ also enable greater coordination (i.e., synchronized activation) between brain regions. These findings offer new evidence that structured techniques like TRIZ reduce cognitive activation, change patterns of activation and increase coordination between regions in the brain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概念生成技术改变了工程设计过程中大脑的激活模式
摘要:本文研究了30名工科学生在使用三种不同的设计概念生成技术:头脑风暴、形态分析和TRIZ时的大脑激活情况。用功能性近红外光谱法测量了学生前额叶皮层大脑活动的变化。结果是基于含氧血流动力学反应的曲线下面积分析,以及使用Pearson相关性来比较学生使用这三种不同的思维技术时的认知脑激活的功能连通性评估。结果表明,与TRIZ相比,头脑风暴和形态分析需要更多的前额叶皮层(PFC)的认知激活。当头脑风暴和使用形态分析时,最高的认知激活是在右背外侧PFC (DLPFC)和腹侧PFC,这些区域与发散思维和不明确的解决问题有关。TRIZ在左侧DLPFC产生更多的认知激活。这个区域与趋同思维和判断有关。形态分析和TRIZ也使大脑区域之间的协调(即同步激活)更大。这些发现提供了新的证据,证明像TRIZ这样的结构化技术可以减少认知激活,改变激活模式,增加大脑区域之间的协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Design Science
Design Science ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Design issues concerning circular economy assessment methods at the product level: a comparative analysis through a case study of a mobile tiny house Research through co-design Ilmenau’s contributions to Design Science Exploring the impact of design tool usage on design for additive manufacturing processes and outcomes Interesting and impressive: exploring design factors for product graphics interchange format to enhance engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1