Discursive metaphorical frames in newspaper texts on language change

Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI:10.1075/MSW.17013.BOG
Ksenija Bogetić
{"title":"Discursive metaphorical frames in newspaper texts on language change","authors":"Ksenija Bogetić","doi":"10.1075/MSW.17013.BOG","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The concept of ‘metaphorical framing’ is currently witnessing renewed interest in metaphor research, but for\n discourse-oriented work it remains a problematic analytical tool given the variety of senses it has been employed with. The\n present paper considers an approach to metaphorical frames in discourse, by proposing the notion of discursive\n metaphorical frames to capture the complex, systematic metaphorical representations prominent across discourse. The\n perspective follows the direction of recent integrated approaches to metaphor, frames and discourse (e.g., Burgers et al., 2016; Cameron et al., 2009; Semino et al., 2016) and is proposed as particularly suited to studying public\n discourses, as ideologically laden, multi-textual and multi-voiced. The approach is illustrated through an analysis of\n metaphorical representations of language in Serbian and British newspapers. The analysis reveals the deeper social ideologies\n underlying the newspaper discussions on language in Serbia and Great Britain, including similarities as well as notable\n differences, pointing to the diverse ideological processes shaping contemporary media metadiscourses. The results are also\n discussed in relation to the adopted approach, to frames of presentation, (sub)domain representations and the dynamics of metaphor\n use in public discourse.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/MSW.17013.BOG","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The concept of ‘metaphorical framing’ is currently witnessing renewed interest in metaphor research, but for discourse-oriented work it remains a problematic analytical tool given the variety of senses it has been employed with. The present paper considers an approach to metaphorical frames in discourse, by proposing the notion of discursive metaphorical frames to capture the complex, systematic metaphorical representations prominent across discourse. The perspective follows the direction of recent integrated approaches to metaphor, frames and discourse (e.g., Burgers et al., 2016; Cameron et al., 2009; Semino et al., 2016) and is proposed as particularly suited to studying public discourses, as ideologically laden, multi-textual and multi-voiced. The approach is illustrated through an analysis of metaphorical representations of language in Serbian and British newspapers. The analysis reveals the deeper social ideologies underlying the newspaper discussions on language in Serbia and Great Britain, including similarities as well as notable differences, pointing to the diverse ideological processes shaping contemporary media metadiscourses. The results are also discussed in relation to the adopted approach, to frames of presentation, (sub)domain representations and the dynamics of metaphor use in public discourse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
论报刊语篇中语言变化的话语隐喻框架
“隐喻框架”的概念目前正重新引起人们对隐喻研究的兴趣,但对于以话语为导向的工作来说,考虑到它所使用的各种感官,它仍然是一种有问题的分析工具。本文通过提出话语隐喻框架的概念来捕捉话语中突出的复杂、系统的隐喻表征,从而探讨话语中隐喻框架的方法。该观点遵循了最近对隐喻、框架和话语的综合方法的方向(例如,Burgers等人,2016;Cameron等人,2009;Semino等人,2016),并被认为特别适合研究公共话语,如意识形态负载、多文本和多声音。通过对塞尔维亚语和英国报纸语言隐喻表征的分析,说明了这种方法。该分析揭示了塞尔维亚和英国报纸对语言讨论背后更深层次的社会意识形态,包括相似之处和显著差异,指出了塑造当代媒体元话语的不同意识形态过程。研究结果还与所采用的方法、呈现框架、(子)领域表征以及公共话语中隐喻使用的动态有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1