Differences of Confirmatory Case, Mortality Rate and Incident Mortality of COVID-19 in Indonesia, Asia and Who Online Data Case Study

IF 0.9 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Information & Knowledge Management Pub Date : 2021-03-31 DOI:10.26553/JIKM.2021.12.1.50-59
Nugroho Susanto
{"title":"Differences of Confirmatory Case, Mortality Rate and Incident Mortality of COVID-19 in Indonesia, Asia and Who Online Data Case Study","authors":"Nugroho Susanto","doi":"10.26553/JIKM.2021.12.1.50-59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Turkish Ministry of Health estimated that 6.3% cases of COVID-19 fatality in April 2020 and 2.1% cases of COVID-19 mortality are associated with multi-factors. COVID-19 is very dangerous for moderate respiratory infection and has higher mortality compared to other diseases such as SARS-CoV-2. The study aims to compare case confirmation, mortality and compare incidence rate mortality between Indonesia and the world’s general situation. The study designs used a cross-sectional study with secondary data. The study population was people who have been diagnosed to covid-19 based on the website with URL: https://covid19.who.int/ and URL: https://covid19.kemkes.go.id/ for the period of March 2020 to November 2020. The Independent Variables are areas of disease i.e. Indonesia, Asia, and world area. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Data were analyzed with ANOVA. Average of confirmatory covid-19 is 1891.65±1468.412 in Indonesia, 41146.94±34159.12 in Asia, and 211914.42±128689.95 according to WHO. The average mortality was 62.29±37.69 in Indonesia, 635.36±453.68 in Asia, and 5279.71±1540.41 according to WHO. The incidence mortality rate was 0.046±0.0326 in Indonesia, averaged 0.023±0.0157 in Asia, and averaged 0.035±0.0231 according to WHO. There was a significant difference in confirmatory case between Indonesia, Asia and WHO with p<0.001, a significant difference in mortality between Indonesia, Asia and WHO with p<0.001, and significant difference in incidence mortality between Indonesia, Asia, and Indonesia with p<0.001. The study was concluded that there are significant differences in confirmatory case, death, and incident mortality between Indonesia, Asia and WHO. Confirmatory case and mortality were higher in WHO and Asia when compared to Indonesia, but incidence mortality was high in Indonesia when compared to WHO and Asia. Keyword: COVID-19, incident, mortality, differences","PeriodicalId":45460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information & Knowledge Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information & Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26553/JIKM.2021.12.1.50-59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Turkish Ministry of Health estimated that 6.3% cases of COVID-19 fatality in April 2020 and 2.1% cases of COVID-19 mortality are associated with multi-factors. COVID-19 is very dangerous for moderate respiratory infection and has higher mortality compared to other diseases such as SARS-CoV-2. The study aims to compare case confirmation, mortality and compare incidence rate mortality between Indonesia and the world’s general situation. The study designs used a cross-sectional study with secondary data. The study population was people who have been diagnosed to covid-19 based on the website with URL: https://covid19.who.int/ and URL: https://covid19.kemkes.go.id/ for the period of March 2020 to November 2020. The Independent Variables are areas of disease i.e. Indonesia, Asia, and world area. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Data were analyzed with ANOVA. Average of confirmatory covid-19 is 1891.65±1468.412 in Indonesia, 41146.94±34159.12 in Asia, and 211914.42±128689.95 according to WHO. The average mortality was 62.29±37.69 in Indonesia, 635.36±453.68 in Asia, and 5279.71±1540.41 according to WHO. The incidence mortality rate was 0.046±0.0326 in Indonesia, averaged 0.023±0.0157 in Asia, and averaged 0.035±0.0231 according to WHO. There was a significant difference in confirmatory case between Indonesia, Asia and WHO with p<0.001, a significant difference in mortality between Indonesia, Asia and WHO with p<0.001, and significant difference in incidence mortality between Indonesia, Asia, and Indonesia with p<0.001. The study was concluded that there are significant differences in confirmatory case, death, and incident mortality between Indonesia, Asia and WHO. Confirmatory case and mortality were higher in WHO and Asia when compared to Indonesia, but incidence mortality was high in Indonesia when compared to WHO and Asia. Keyword: COVID-19, incident, mortality, differences
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚、亚洲地区COVID-19确诊病例、死亡率和发病率差异与世卫组织在线数据案例研究
土耳其卫生部估计,2020年4月6.3%的COVID-19死亡病例和2.1%的COVID-19死亡病例与多种因素有关。COVID-19对中度呼吸道感染非常危险,与SARS-CoV-2等其他疾病相比,死亡率更高。该研究旨在比较印度尼西亚与世界一般情况之间的病例确认、死亡率和发病率死亡率。研究设计采用了二次资料的横断面研究。研究人群是根据2020年3月至2020年11月期间URL: https://covid19.who.int/和URL: https://covid19.kemkes.go.id/的网站被诊断为covid-19的人。自变量是疾病地区,即印度尼西亚、亚洲和世界地区。采用SPSS进行统计分析。数据采用方差分析。据世卫组织统计,印度尼西亚确诊病例平均为1891.65±1468.412例,亚洲为41146.94±34159.12例,亚洲为211914.42±128689.95例。印度尼西亚的平均死亡率为62.29±37.69,亚洲为635.36±453.68,世界卫生组织的平均死亡率为5279.71±1540.41。印度尼西亚发病死亡率为0.046±0.0326,亚洲平均为0.023±0.0157,世界卫生组织平均为0.035±0.0231。印度尼西亚、亚洲和WHO之间的确诊病例有显著差异(p<0.001),印度尼西亚、亚洲和WHO之间的死亡率有显著差异(p<0.001),印度尼西亚、亚洲和印度尼西亚之间的发病率死亡率有显著差异(p<0.001)。该研究的结论是,印度尼西亚、亚洲和世卫组织在确诊病例、死亡和发病率方面存在显著差异。与印度尼西亚相比,世卫组织和亚洲的确诊病例和死亡率较高,但与世卫组织和亚洲相比,印度尼西亚的发病率死亡率较高。关键词:COVID-19,事件,死亡率,差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information & Knowledge Management
Journal of Information & Knowledge Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: JIKM is a refereed journal published quarterly by World Scientific and dedicated to the exchange of the latest research and practical information in the field of information processing and knowledge management. The journal publishes original research and case studies by academic, business and government contributors on all aspects of information processing, information management, knowledge management, tools, techniques and technologies, knowledge creation and sharing, best practices, policies and guidelines. JIKM is an international journal aimed at providing quality information to subscribers around the world. Managed by an international editorial board, JIKM positions itself as one of the leading scholarly journals in the field of information processing and knowledge management. It is a good reference for both information and knowledge management professionals. The journal covers key areas in the field of information and knowledge management. Research papers, practical applications, working papers, and case studies are invited in the following areas: -Business intelligence and competitive intelligence -Communication and organizational culture -e-Learning and life long learning -Electronic records and document management -Information processing and information management -Information organization, taxonomies and ontology -Intellectual capital -Knowledge creation, retention, sharing and transfer -Knowledge discovery, data and text mining -Knowledge management and innovations -Knowledge management education -Knowledge management tools and technologies -Knowledge management measurements -Knowledge professionals and leadership -Learning organization and organizational learning -Practical implementations of knowledge management
期刊最新文献
Antecedents of Intention to Use Social Media for Virtual Events Identifying the Most Significant Features for Stress Prediction of Automobile Drivers: A Comprehensive Study Preface: Special Issue on Knowledge, Uncertainty and Risks Artificial Intelligence Competencies in Logistics Management: An Empirical Insight from Bahrain Presenting an Effective Motivational Model on the Knowledge Acquisition Process Using Fuzzy Best-Worst Method (FBWM)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1