The Multifaceted, Comprehensive Vocabulary Instructional Program: Quantitative Findings from a Three-Year Formative Experiment

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Literacy Research and Instruction Pub Date : 2020-10-20 DOI:10.1080/19388071.2020.1822473
Patrick C. Manyak, Camile L. Z. Blachowicz, Michael F. Graves
{"title":"The Multifaceted, Comprehensive Vocabulary Instructional Program: Quantitative Findings from a Three-Year Formative Experiment","authors":"Patrick C. Manyak, Camile L. Z. Blachowicz, Michael F. Graves","doi":"10.1080/19388071.2020.1822473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article reports on a 3-year formative experiment involving the implementation and testing of a long-term, multifaceted vocabulary instruction program in fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms in three demographically distinct schools. The quantitative findings indicate that the students, across the 3 years of the project, showed accelerated growth in general vocabulary knowledge in comparison to the large norming sample of a standardized vocabulary test frequently used in research. Additional analyses compared the performance of limited-English-proficient students to that of native English-speaking and redesignated fluent-English-proficient students on the standardized vocabulary test and several researcher-designed assessments. The authors conclude by discussing the significance and the limitations of the findings and the ways that this uniquely successful intervention contributes to research and practice aimed at enhancing elementary-school students’ vocabulary knowledge.","PeriodicalId":45434,"journal":{"name":"Literacy Research and Instruction","volume":"60 1","pages":"301 - 331"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388071.2020.1822473","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy Research and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2020.1822473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article reports on a 3-year formative experiment involving the implementation and testing of a long-term, multifaceted vocabulary instruction program in fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms in three demographically distinct schools. The quantitative findings indicate that the students, across the 3 years of the project, showed accelerated growth in general vocabulary knowledge in comparison to the large norming sample of a standardized vocabulary test frequently used in research. Additional analyses compared the performance of limited-English-proficient students to that of native English-speaking and redesignated fluent-English-proficient students on the standardized vocabulary test and several researcher-designed assessments. The authors conclude by discussing the significance and the limitations of the findings and the ways that this uniquely successful intervention contributes to research and practice aimed at enhancing elementary-school students’ vocabulary knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多方面、全面的词汇教学计划:三年形成性实验的定量结果
摘要本文报道了一项为期三年的形成性实验,该实验涉及在三所人口统计学不同的学校的四年级和五年级课堂上实施和测试一项长期的、多方面的词汇教学计划。定量研究结果表明,在该项目的三年中,与研究中经常使用的标准化词汇测试的大样本相比,学生的一般词汇知识增长加快。其他分析将有限英语熟练学生的表现与母语为英语的学生的表现进行了比较,并重新设计了流利英语熟练学生在标准化词汇测试和几项研究人员设计的评估中的表现。最后,作者讨论了研究结果的意义和局限性,以及这种独特的成功干预措施对旨在提高小学生词汇知识的研究和实践的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Literacy Research and Instruction
Literacy Research and Instruction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Literacy Research and Instruction (formerly Reading Research and Instruction), the official journal of the College Reading Association, is an international refereed professional journal that publishes articles dealing with research and instruction in reading education and allied literacy fields. The journal is especially focused on instructional practices and applied or basic research of special interest to reading and literacy educators. Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by reviewers.
期刊最新文献
Empowering Adolescent Emergent Readers in Government Schools: An Exploration of Multimodal Texts as Pathways to Comprehension Novice Teachers’ Knowledge of Racial Literacies Effect of Dramatic Storytelling on Emergent Literacy in EFL: Evidence from the UAE Kindergartens Reexamining the Dolch Basic Sight Word List: Contemporary Considerations for Culturally Sustaining Approaches to Assess Sight Word Development A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Synchronous Paired Oral Reading Techniques in Elementary Classrooms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1