Boundaries of Marital and Family Intimacy: From Theory to Empirical Approaches

Q4 Social Sciences Enfances, Familles, Generations Pub Date : 2019-12-22 DOI:10.7202/1070306AR
Chiara Piazzesi, M. Blais, Hélène Belleau
{"title":"Boundaries of Marital and Family Intimacy: From Theory to\n Empirical Approaches","authors":"Chiara Piazzesi, M. Blais, Hélène Belleau","doi":"10.7202/1070306AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research Framework : This article discusses the symbolic, discursive and practical boundaries of intimate relationships. Our approach is inspired by Niklas Luhmann's systems theory. The \"boundary\" is conceived as an operation of a relationship in relation to itself: the relationship defines itself through its communicative operations and thus defines the legitimate expectations of its members. The relation thus exists as a boundary through its communicative operations, which directly or indirectly determine what it is and what it is not. Symbols, rules of meaning and semantic references are tools used in boundary work. However, the symbols do not define the ways in which these tools may be employed in this work. Objectives : The article has two main objectives. First, by utilizing and defining the concepts of \"boundaries\" and \"boundary work,\" the paper offers innovative theoretical tools for intimacy research. Second, it demonstrates the empirical utility of these concepts by discussing examples of their application to the study of forms and processes of intimacy in the social sciences. Methodology : Primarily theoretical in focus, the paper begins by conceptually clarifying and defining the concepts of \"boundaries\" and \"boundary work\" in the social sciences, and then discusses their applications to intimate, marital and family relationships. Results : The boundaries of relationships emerge from the operationalization of symbols, semantic references or rules of meaning in communication between partners or members of relationships. The symbols used do not determine the methods of their operationalization, which makes it necessary to observe the operations of the boundary work directly in order to describe and understand them. Conclusions : Having explored the theoretical and empirical foundations of the concept of boundaries in the sociology of intimate relations, this paper documents the centrality of semantics and discourse in the boundary work that defines intimate relations. It also shows how the concept captures the operations of self-definition that the relationships themselves need in order to continue to exist.  Contribution:  This article summarizes what is known about the concept of boundaries and shows its heuristic potential for addressing intimate, marital or family relationships. The articles collected in this issue also contribute by demonstrating its relevance in analyzing a diversity of intimate relationships, regardless of their composition, duration, or degrees of stability or institutionalization.","PeriodicalId":38709,"journal":{"name":"Enfances, Familles, Generations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfances, Familles, Generations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1070306AR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research Framework : This article discusses the symbolic, discursive and practical boundaries of intimate relationships. Our approach is inspired by Niklas Luhmann's systems theory. The "boundary" is conceived as an operation of a relationship in relation to itself: the relationship defines itself through its communicative operations and thus defines the legitimate expectations of its members. The relation thus exists as a boundary through its communicative operations, which directly or indirectly determine what it is and what it is not. Symbols, rules of meaning and semantic references are tools used in boundary work. However, the symbols do not define the ways in which these tools may be employed in this work. Objectives : The article has two main objectives. First, by utilizing and defining the concepts of "boundaries" and "boundary work," the paper offers innovative theoretical tools for intimacy research. Second, it demonstrates the empirical utility of these concepts by discussing examples of their application to the study of forms and processes of intimacy in the social sciences. Methodology : Primarily theoretical in focus, the paper begins by conceptually clarifying and defining the concepts of "boundaries" and "boundary work" in the social sciences, and then discusses their applications to intimate, marital and family relationships. Results : The boundaries of relationships emerge from the operationalization of symbols, semantic references or rules of meaning in communication between partners or members of relationships. The symbols used do not determine the methods of their operationalization, which makes it necessary to observe the operations of the boundary work directly in order to describe and understand them. Conclusions : Having explored the theoretical and empirical foundations of the concept of boundaries in the sociology of intimate relations, this paper documents the centrality of semantics and discourse in the boundary work that defines intimate relations. It also shows how the concept captures the operations of self-definition that the relationships themselves need in order to continue to exist.  Contribution:  This article summarizes what is known about the concept of boundaries and shows its heuristic potential for addressing intimate, marital or family relationships. The articles collected in this issue also contribute by demonstrating its relevance in analyzing a diversity of intimate relationships, regardless of their composition, duration, or degrees of stability or institutionalization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婚姻和家庭亲密关系的边界:从理论到实证方法
研究框架:本文讨论了亲密关系的象征性、话语性和实践性边界。我们的方法受到Niklas Luhmann系统理论的启发。“边界”被认为是一种关系相对于自身的运作:这种关系通过其交际运作来定义自己,从而定义其成员的合法期望。因此,这种关系通过其交际操作作为一个边界存在,直接或间接地决定了它是什么和不是什么。符号、意义规则和语义参照是边界工作中使用的工具。然而,这些符号并没有定义在这项工作中使用这些工具的方式。目标:本文有两个主要目标。首先,通过运用和界定“边界”和“边界工作”的概念,为亲密关系研究提供了创新的理论工具。其次,通过讨论这些概念在社会科学中亲密关系形式和过程研究中的应用实例,证明了这些概念的实证效用。方法论:本文首先从理论角度出发,从概念上澄清和定义社会科学中的“边界”和“边界工作”的概念,然后讨论它们在亲密关系、婚姻关系和家庭关系中的应用。结果:关系的边界产生于关系伙伴或成员之间交流中符号、语义参考或意义规则的操作。所使用的符号并不能决定其操作方法,这使得有必要直接观察边界工作的操作,以便描述和理解它们。结论:本文探讨了亲密关系社会学中边界概念的理论和实证基础,记录了语义和话语在定义亲密关系的边界工作中的中心地位。它还展示了这个概念如何捕捉到关系本身为了继续存在所需要的自我定义的操作。贡献:本文总结了边界概念的已知内容,并展示了其在处理亲密、婚姻或家庭关系方面的启发潜力。本期收集的文章也有助于证明其在分析各种亲密关系方面的相关性,无论其组成、持续时间、稳定性或制度化程度如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Enfances, Familles, Generations
Enfances, Familles, Generations Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Im/migration: Family Strategies and Access to Rights Vieillir chez soi en situation de dépendance : attachement au domicile et (dis)continuité identitaire au grand âge Home and the Limits of Individualization: Imbalance Between Personal, Statutory, and Belonging spaces L’individu à l’épreuve du chez-soi Réinvestir son foyer lors d’un cancer, une menace pour l’individualisation des adolescent∙e∙s ? Retours d’expériences maternelles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1