Faith in/as the Unconditional: Kant, Husserl, and Derrida on Practical Reason

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY Derrida Today Pub Date : 2019-10-25 DOI:10.3366/drt.2019.0208
Dylan Shaul
{"title":"Faith in/as the Unconditional: Kant, Husserl, and Derrida on Practical Reason","authors":"Dylan Shaul","doi":"10.3366/drt.2019.0208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article tracks Derrida's readings of Kant and Husserl as they explore the relation between, on the one hand, faith and knowledge, and on the other, theory and practice (theoretical and practical reason). Kant had to limit the scope of theoretical knowledge in order to make room for a practical faith in the rational ideas of the unconditioned (God, freedom, and immortality), generated through the unconditionality of the moral law. Husserl deployed the figure of ‘the Idea in the Kantian sense’ at those crucial moments in the exposition of his transcendental phenomenology where the unconditioned comes into play, a problematic strategy that Derrida judges to have revealed the limits of the phenomenological project. While Husserl's call for an unconditional theoretical and practical renewal of faith in reason appears to offer him an out, Husserlian faith is ultimately dependent on an untenable circularity, to which the Kantian variety also succumbs. Only Derrida's unconditional gift of faith can save the honour of reason from its mortal crisis, but in a manner that is itself not wholly a matter of reason.","PeriodicalId":42836,"journal":{"name":"Derrida Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3366/drt.2019.0208","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Derrida Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/drt.2019.0208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article tracks Derrida's readings of Kant and Husserl as they explore the relation between, on the one hand, faith and knowledge, and on the other, theory and practice (theoretical and practical reason). Kant had to limit the scope of theoretical knowledge in order to make room for a practical faith in the rational ideas of the unconditioned (God, freedom, and immortality), generated through the unconditionality of the moral law. Husserl deployed the figure of ‘the Idea in the Kantian sense’ at those crucial moments in the exposition of his transcendental phenomenology where the unconditioned comes into play, a problematic strategy that Derrida judges to have revealed the limits of the phenomenological project. While Husserl's call for an unconditional theoretical and practical renewal of faith in reason appears to offer him an out, Husserlian faith is ultimately dependent on an untenable circularity, to which the Kantian variety also succumbs. Only Derrida's unconditional gift of faith can save the honour of reason from its mortal crisis, but in a manner that is itself not wholly a matter of reason.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信仰无条件:康德、胡塞尔和德里达论实践理性
本文追踪了德里达对康德和胡塞尔的解读,因为他们一方面探索信仰和知识,另一方面探索理论和实践(理论和实践理性)之间的关系。康德不得不限制理论知识的范围,以便为通过道德法则的无条件性而产生的无条件者(上帝、自由和永生)的理性思想的实践信念腾出空间。胡塞尔在阐述他的先验现象学的那些关键时刻部署了“康德意义上的理念”的形象,在这些关键时刻,无条件者发挥了作用,德里达认为这是一种有问题的策略,揭示了现象学项目的局限性。虽然胡塞尔呼吁在理论和实践上无条件地更新对理性的信仰,这似乎为他提供了一个出路,但胡塞尔的信仰最终取决于一种站不住脚的循环性,康德的多样性也屈服于这种循环性。只有德里达无条件的信仰才能将理性的荣誉从致命的危机中拯救出来,但这种方式本身并不完全是理性的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Derrida Today
Derrida Today PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Large library docking for cannabinoid-1 receptor agonists with reduced side effects. Life, Would That it Might Be To Say – Power, Metaphor, Tragen, Épuis(s)ement Schizogonies: Deconstruction of Derrida’s Deconstruction of Reproduction General Editor's Note Front matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1